he doesn't buy his milk from the same guy he gets his drugs from.
it doesn't matter what i support. i my point was that taking drugs can be risky. to say you're a "safe user" is just stupid. drugs are not manufactured the way you see it on tv. they're usually made in a damp abandoned building with all sorts of animals pissing and shitting everywhere.
have you ever seen the process in which cocaine is made? let's just say once harvested, a big hole in the jungle is dug out and lined with plastic sheeting. oh, and they also use petrol to help extract the cocaine from the coca plant.
and that's just the start. and only one drug.
for the first time EVER i was glad my internet connection was shit. i got as far as reading the title, it was still buffering so i was close. but i was saved.
going over my set for the Movida Corrona Kelly's heat. it's going sweet so far. managed to get 8 (trance) tunes into 20 minutes so there's plenty of content.
and i hope you can understand why there's a slight smell of cow pats coming from your posts. it's nothing personal. my bs filter is highly tuned and nothing much gets past it.
yes i did. hence my post. i hope you realize that those instruments would have been recorded onto pc/mac and then the tech would ensure everything is quantized.
the song was probably wrote on a mac or pc too.
you're still not getting it are you? the pills were examples (saving me from listing every possibility of a dirty drug). the needles were an example (saving me from listing every possibility of a dirty drug). the weed was an example (saving me from listing every possibility of a dirty drug).
there is no such thing as safe usage when it comes to illegal drugs made in some back alley (another example). you might think you're safe, but what about the guy making the stuff? or the guy getting the ingredients? or the guys equipment? yes you can be safe when taking drugs, but you have no control over how they're made. where they're made. and by who they're made by.
to think you're safe is just ignorance m8. you'll understand when you're older.
did you know that if the person making the mdma has the flu then his batch could be contaminated. it's all good and well testing to see if your drugs have drugs in them. but do you test for contaminants? do you test for consistency? do you test to see what other ingredients are used?
it's been digitally captured and streamed through the internet to your speakers. real instruments don't come into it any more. drag yourself into the 21t century dude.
aye, the latter has more recreational opportunities.
the difference is smaller than you think. it only takes one bad drug to do the damage. it's the risk you take. people have died after taking one pill, people have lived decades after taking thousands of pills. when it's your time, it's your time.
her death was the result of depression. she was dealing with her depression the only way she knew how to. she was on really low side of her up and down life style and simply didn't recover from it. if she did survive the low, people would have said she was crying out for help. the line is than thin sometimes.
created or creating? you're not making much sense. i pretty much said what i posted. if you don't understand, stay off the chemicals.
does the air that makes the "bigger bang" go through an intake? which would restrict the amount of air that can actually go into the engine?
also, would the big hole at the bottom of the engine bay create a vacuum sucking all this colder more dense air right out of the bottom of the car? unless the air inside the engine bay is static (which i doubt) then making holes on your car and calling them intakes or vents is pretty stupid.
let me run something past you. i hope you're sitting down because it's going to blow your freaking mind. tinted lenses maybe?
being a straight man, i couldn't comment on what's gay and what's not. although i always thought bright yellow on a car reeked of turd stabbery. i guess i'll leave the gay decisions to you. you seem to have a knack for it.
Well they can state whatever they wan't but if tested it on track and i felt a difference. Extra cold air is ALWAYS better then hot air from the engine, especially N/A engines.
erm....
We run one on our race car, mostly because it can't hurt and we wanted to get rid of the headlights and their wiring anyway."
they have one on their car and it has little/no effect on the car. try to keep up. you'd feel a difference if your fly is open too, doesn't mean it's better/faster/cooler/gayer/straighter.
Removed headlight allows direct cold air into the intake, to squeeze as much extra power out as possible...and you're all bitching about its looks?
Its like bitching about a track car not having interior.
I can just imagine one of you morons saying
"The floor has no carpet, it looks ugly, and how are you meant to set in the back?"
ITS A TRACK CAR.
hey idiot, how do you explain the stickers on his car then? what function to they have? most track cars i've seen have both headlights. he could at least colour the "working" light black.
just because an opinion is different from yours. it doesn't mean that it's moronic or idiotic. only a complete window licker would think such a thing....
i still think it looks ugly(like broke). <<< my opinion. also my opinion; i don't know why someone would spend so much money on a car not to make a tidier job on the headlight space.
"It's unlikely that there is really ANY power difference, and there's certainly no ram air effect, as the air still has to pass through the ITG or K&N cone filter which recieves plenty of cold air around the edges of the headlight opening anyway. The most important benefits of the headlight scope are probably in this order:
1) Couple pounds of weight savings over the headlight.
2) Looks cool on TV and at the track!
3) .0001% in horsepower.
We run one on our race car, mostly because it can't hurt and we wanted to get rid of the headlights and their wiring anyway."