Quote from edge3147 :

Team Name:Motion Motorsports
Server (Y/N): Y
If yes server name: Motion Motorsports Race
Type: Race Team
Team info: Newly formed, looking to build up a roster.
Website: http://www.motion-motorsports.net
Are you willing to accept members immediately or will you test drivers?: Test
Demo/S1/S2?: S1 & S2
Extra Info (teamtag etc): MM Name
Best way to contact us: Skype or LFS Forum PM
What experience of drivers: Novice to Veteran

STATUS: ACTIVE

Bump!

Sry, late night at work, results will be posted today.

Did not deem it necessary to penalize anyone directly for the incident. He apologized as well.

Try to react as quickly and safely as possible is my only suggestion.

Last edited by edge3147, Wed 13 Jun 2012, 14:16.

Quote from cargame.nl :

And why not?

I installed a home cinema this weekend in my house. Costed me the whole weekend. When I want to install five home cinema's then I expect to spend another five weekends on that. Probably faster because I get the hang of it or probably slower because I do not get the same motivation/satisfaction to do it.

It's annoying to read here by some that we cannot expect some releases because its suddenly all so difficult the last four years. There is no explanation for this sudden hold up of releasing content. Well there is; tire physics. Like I said before, Scawen didn't expect to let development hold up that long and would have released content if he knew that beforehand. Another year has passed, still problems. => draw conclusions, release content first and do some other little improvements which make a -hugh- difference. Simple.

:iagree:

Sorry for the delay, I will get First Round Results up by end of the day (6/13).

Quote from DANIEL-CRO :

Great work, still going to leave the age requirement off.

Quote from jjjeeefff :

am i still able to join the series?

regards jp

Yes you will just be short points for round 1.



Registrations will close after round 3.

Quote from Taavi(EST) :

but thanks to people like you it will again not include any new content.

Pointing fingers at me for having a discussion? :insane:

My discussion is not going to keep new content from coming, that decision is upto the devs.

Last edited by edge3147, Fri 8 Jun 2012, 22:04.

Removed the age requirement in hopes of attracting more drivers.

Well, this thread has been tarnished enough. I won't be participating in the discussion within it anymore.

Quote from col :

snip

what you are trying to achieve by attacking Cargame and the posters of this thread? If you do not like what is being discussed, don't read it or reply to it.

(attacking in the sense of repetitive negative criticism)

First race finished without any majors problems. Official results, replays and standings will be posted in a few days, thanks for all those that showed up, see you at round 2.

Post your complaints here, thanks.

Timecode:
car numbers:
What happened:

15 minutes remaining in qualifying, then we go racing.

Sorry, not for this race, Ill make sure it's on for round 2. Qualifiying is already going.

Livestream is online too now. www.livestream.com/mmtbo2012

Qualifiying has begun, server is pass proteced. The password is tbo2012.

Qualifying will begin in a few minutes. Live stream is coming online now.

Quote from col :

Maybe you could explain what you are trying to achieve by attacking LFS and its development team ?

ive stated multiple times im just having a discussion, you are the one attacking and throwing around accusations about us hating LFS.

I think 15 is a fair age, not to young but not to old either.

All this bashing on cargame is sad, the cargame servers are the most popular race servers on LFS right now. I feel what cargame is saying. In 4 years of waiting for development to take place, we have seen 1 or 2 screenshots, but 0 test versions of said development. We have recieved a few updates, but those were very very minor in aspect.

It's a shame the devs don't take a few minutes to interact with the community that they built.

All in all, i think any sort of progress report would be progress at this point.

Quote from N I K I :

snip

+1

I have no problem with paying for new content and waiting for them to be developed, but when you tell someone you will release already finished content "soon" and then don't release it after 4 yrs, it makes people skeptical.

I will always be an LFS fan, there is no doubt about it. I am not trying to bash LFS and the team that is working on it, I am merely trying figure out what is going on in terms of development. I can understand that the scirocco and rockingham where supposed to be a secret until they were ready for release, but the devs were not successful in doing that. They made the announcements and used the term soon to keep everyone at ease. Well after 4 years, soon, is no longer the proper term. The scirocco release would be a great way of showing their dedication the community and continued efforts at bringing new content. They could still work on the new tyre physics and then refine the scirocco after they have finished the tyre physics because either way, once the tyre phyics are done, the game is going to be forever changed. I would hate to have a completed project just to have it sit around for 4 years not being appreciated or admired. After all, they said the Scirocco is S1 License content.

Quote from pipa :

Would that make any difference progress wise? I also doubt there is more to explain than what he already has posted.

It would atleast show us they are doing something, right now its as if nothing is being done.

Quote from pipa :

What stinks here is the arrogance with which you want new free updates.
Obviously you can voice your oppinion, but at the end of the day you paid for a full product and its up to the devs to decide where they are going with lfs.

You sure you can ask, but all i see is whining and demanding new stuff.

Quote :

End-user License Agreement

1.4 You must be aware that we can alter any aspect of LFS as we see fit. Improvements, fixes and/or changes made to the game, are to be expected.

I am not in the "anti-eric" clan. I am merely discussing the state of development.