Im concerned against it everywhere. I think everyone have the same conditions. I want to be fast and to go forward I dont want to go backward. And the best is to go forward with others and have some great racing.

It will just annoy. Maybe some worse players would be happy but if they come with better skills on day they wont participate as the server would add them handicaps and the race result would be know before even start. And the result would be maybe the same like before so the challange is nowhere.

I think that community will decrease after this. Thats Communism what I dont like.

Last edited by L@gger, Sun 12 Dec 2010, 12:47.

Me too. Those racers who would like this idea are still too slow to win with 30kg hced opponents. But I dont think so that it will take there people I think it will just an opposite effect as it wont be about skill anymore. And a very active racers in this event will be just frustrated. I would probably quit if it go this way as I want to have some serious racing against my skill category. Anyway whats with fast people from 2 months ago events?

In my opinion and others share the same its useless. Last race many racers said that they dont care if mugen win in a row but they want a fair fight with him. Race isnt about changing grid its about skills. We can change grid by getting more experience. This is something like computer win lottery.

BTW: I felt worse when I won last saturday than when I had a great race the saturday before and didnt even completed.

Funny is that mugen still could get in 2 or 3 position but server gave him another 15kg hc to kill him next race. Anyway i was slow, i crashed and still won by 18 seconds. Mugen best time was 1:13.4 I mean and mine 1:12.8 he was like 0.6-0.8 seconds slower!

I think static and dynamic restrictions arent really needed. The only case where I can imagine use of restriction is a race with more car types. Example XRG/XFG. If you really feel that XRG is faster add some intake restriction to it maybe 5%. Dynamic restriction is really bad as you always need to set it and as some racers are disadvantaged.

I dont think so that weight transfer is positive if CG is below surface. Centrifugal force should be aplied at that point so there should be a moment transfering more force on inside wheels if im right.

You are right. So if I want negative weight transfer CG should be below surface. That makes sense. I thought the momentum is from the wheel axis but now got that. Thanks
From extreme example: if you have wheels with high diameter with low wheelbase and CG somewhere in mid of wheel radius down it should be really positive weight transfer. Something you cant earn so easily - the way of thinking. Thanks

Last edited by L@gger, Thu 18 Nov 2010, 23:12.

The reason why im asking is because im RC racer and onroad cars have CG somewhere near wheel axis. I think that weight transfer have to do something with roll center and center of gravity. In my opinion there still should be weight transfer if you get CG somewhere under wheel axis but what happens if you get CG alot down (maybe practicaly not possible)?

Sure. But im speaking about CG. Im sure that it cant be below surface but anyway in total extreme way of imagination.

But in totaly extreme situation that cant happen when weight center is long below car, maybe in asphalt? Im trying to look on things from two extremes.

Hello .If im right weight transfer is changing by change of weight center up/down. But what happens if you get weight center below wheel axis. This isnt probably posible with most cars, but will be the effect of weight transfer negative? I mean when you are in corner outside wheels are pulled with less force and inside with bigger force?

Thanks for your answers

So you move your videos to educational category and say audio name sin titles?

What do you guys do with songs you use in movie to not get audio muted to not have problems with copyright and so?

Quote from The Very End :

But I agree, it has gone a little too far maybe.

Yes as on some servers there are some safety limits that are pissing racers off. But also if you think there are so many.... that would crash you there. Like spec if you are pit exiting just after car.

Also one time it totaly helped me when server speced total... in front of me whom was staying on corner exit at line. Its the people who are like animals and always needs to be limited

As we are racing (finding the ideal line) I think its stupid to limit those things. Ofcourse it would be nice if things what you cant do in rl would be limited (hiting wall, driving on bump at KY should damage your suspension or tyres/rims more)

Last edited by L@gger, Wed 7 Jul 2010, 21:36.

No it is visual and physical bug. It makes you go to heaven after impact

Hello. I found out wall bug on aston. I mean it wasnt said there. Its prity dangerous for some cars. http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3195/astonbug.jpg
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8089/astonbug2.jpg

With it I found out that you are unable to see some objects throught name bubble.

Last edited by L@gger, Sun 4 Jul 2010, 16:17.

You mean first room scene with those 2 guys?

Quote from brandons48 :

"higher game" girls are usually the ones that get all the attention from the guys for being all pretty or whatever, but soon find out that the guy is just there 'cause he thinks she's hot.

I've got with some girls in the past that I would say are way out of my league, I didn't make any special effort to impress them, didn't try to show off or anything (except maybe when I played guitar for her ) So she saw the real me, not the "hey look at me, i'm so cool!" sides she'd seen in some of the other guys.

So showing LFS skills to impress girl doesnt work?

Quote from Flame CZE :

So do you think when the developers stop developing the physics and go developing graphics, you will be ok when it takes long?

Anyway, the number of LFS players is not going down that rapidly, look here

Its just 30 days period but I can see like 50 ppl drop here. LFS would need some graphic recovery but anyway physics are at 1st place and thats why we are there. (barrier physics still rulez)

Quote from Intrepid :

Why? lol Why would someone defend a position and not make it easy for a rival to get past? Do you know what motor racing actually is? So if someone is faster than you and is behind, you should let them past without issue?

Like why would Webber want to maintain 1st position and maintain the WDC lead? Why would he want to do that now?

Sometimes I wonder about people on this forum... I really do!

So you think race is more about force than inteligence and experience of drivers? Experienced driver should at that conditions give him more place. Propably he would overtake him on next turn. If is someone faster he would pass him sooner or later. And if he wanted to defend his position that hard he should made so before he passed him. At all they would lose much time because of those defendings on mclarens.

Last edited by L@gger, Mon 31 May 2010, 21:40.

I think it was fail of them but more of Mark. Vettel was faster than his teammate in that moment. He tried to overtake him but Webber just didnt gave him any place WHY? Anyway, Vettel should propably go to right because of low grip on left side tyres. I just dont know why experienced driver like Webber was pushing him there.