the rift site should probably have higher requirements listed than the nromal lfs site
havent tried with the new gpu yet but with my old one i had some judder issues in ai races on the rift with a fairly beefy gaming pc
youve paid more for dota than i have for all games ive ever owned
hell for the money you paid for dota stuff you could even afford a base model iphone 5c
It's why we starting to lose one of our national fests in Holland, the best fest for childeren in a year called: Sinterklaas. Nobody in this country has ever seen this fest as racism and especially not childeren.
Because there is a white man surrounded by many black people who are giving presents to childeren this is now seen as racism by some..
probably because dutch people are about equally bad at realising how racist they are against blacks as white americans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid
Actually loads of people want the "holy grail" Scirocco. But it's just a medium powered front wheel drive road car
people dont want the scirocco because its such an amazing car but because its symbolic for the day lfs' development ground to a halt half a decade ago
finally getting it out will be perceived as an act of unclogging the development pipeline
probably because huawei is way too busy designing and manufacturing pretty much every base station sold today to seriously bother with the much lower margings of consumer celular devices
so i didnt get a chance to try it out yesterday (i suppose that was lucky then)
however i spent around 2 hours toying around with it and apart from having to turn pretty much every graphics option to its lowest setting and the loader and monitor setup being a complete mess the rift support works - nearly - brilliantly
2 questions though
1) anbody else experiencing problems that the seating position is too high? i always have to reset while holding my head about 5cm up to get a natrual feeling seating position
2) how the hell do i load and edit setups in rift mode?
Not that Scawen got it right in the very first update
scawen got it a million times closer to correct in the first update that was released to a limited audience
and brought it to the msot spot on rift implementation out of anything out there by the time he released it to the general public
basically the actual speed he was going at doesnt really matter
the fact that he aquaplaned means that he most definitely wasnt going at the speed required of him by the rules for double waved yellow flag situations
yeah i dont like to be that guy but its pretty obvious that the problem here was excessive speed for that corner - and thats without even taking the double waved yellows into account
why dont they just change the rules so that drivers have to engage the pit limiter in double waved yellows?
Yeah... they said that to Columbus too. They also said that about breaking the sound barrier AND putting streaming video on the internet as well.
Your head in the sand response is more in line from what I would expect from self righteous bible thumpers.
Of course you can't make what they call intelligent design a theory. What that is is nonsense.
I'm talking about a serious intelligent design theory, one based on scientific method. How would you go about doing that?
If you were to do that would you first focus on evolutionary development of... whatever and use the unknown variables of that development as a proof of a designer? Which is the major flaw in intelligent design "theory". Or would you bypass that and go looking for the designer first?
it would help if you understood what a scientific theory is when youre trying to discuss them
at least if your goal is to not look stupid
a scientific theory needs to have predictive abilities and by saying things develop according to the unknowable whims of some god you preculde your worldview form having any chance of predicting results
speaking of thrustmaster wheels
how does the new t300rs comapre to the t500rs - has anyone tested the new wheel with that iracing ffb test thingy yet and will ther ebe a model sold either without pedals or pedals that arent crap?
You are misunderstanding the difference between "random" and "complex".
no im not
Coincidences are rare but happen all the time.
thats comepltely the wrong way of looking at the world
So why in evolution we go from simple systems towards more complex system if clt suggests it should go the other way (less peaks, towards the average)? Clt doesn't even work if you look at one species living in one place on earth. Mutations start as rare but become more common over time (if the gene survives). If clt approach was correct then the mutations would not lead anywhere because their effect to the average are meaningless. Instead of one peak the mutations lead to new peaks meaning that your clt should be called multiple limit theorem.
youre misinterpreting what i said
a) species do approach a gaussian distribution - see anything you can measure on humans
b) the main point was that any large sum of random experiments (ie what nature does every single moment anythign happens) approaches a gaussian distribution and thus a state of maximum information