oh i believe you alright

Is there an estimated time that they will arrive back on the server list?

edit: no luck in search..

Quote from wheel4hummer :

Well, I don't actually *need* behind-the-wheel lessons. But, it is required by the state of virginia that you take them. Classroom drivers education is all that I needed to learn the rules. I already know how to drive a car. I have never hit anything or anyone by accident (only on purpose).

exactly, i took classes that reviewed the rulebook that everyone got but no behind the wheel instruction

Quote from Bawbag :

there's no way i'm driving in America with people who pass without 1 lesson.

I agree with you and others' statements concerning the fact that there are too many people on the roads that can't drive. I've been around cars all my life and have been driving tractors, go karts and other machines since i was 4 years old. Because of this, i was already an experienced driver, i didn't need lessons to teach me how to parallel park or make a 3- point turn . I don't know how it works in Europe, but in America, when you turn 16 you get a permit and this allows you to drive with a licensed, over 18 year old in the car with you. I spent many many hours driving with parents or family members in order to get accustomed to traffic driving. Thats why i didn't need lessons

Quote from DieKolkrabe :

New line through the turn

this one made me chuckle, winner

yay, i hope this pic wasn't used before

http://www.libnen.com/images/a1_crash04.jpg

Quote from hrtburnout :

Nice one!



Does that say something about you, or the test?

the test is the same for everyone in new york at least. all my friends took courses, lessons etc. i just took the test, passed first try, no deductions. Not that difficult. We all took it in the same location with the same company, two of my friends failed their first time and thats WITH courses and lessons. The test isn't made to be difficult and its not a driving test at all. Its aim is to make sure that you're safe on the roads and do the right things. its a safety test, not a driving test.

Quote from ayrton senna 87 :

U CAN QUITE CLEARLY SEE MY CAR DEVIATE FROM ITS TRAJECTORY WHEN I WAS HIT

i take no side in this incident whatsoever, just want to clear something up. Unless your car has wings, and was airborn, it has no trajectory.

"i'll bet you 20 bucks i can touch the rail on the other side and come back"

i passed my road test with no lessons at all, big whoop.

Quote from VTiRoj :

Got me gigglin'

Your turn simcsube

wow its not even that funny.

Quote from 11SuLLy11 :

also WTF do karts have safety belts for
more of an hazrd than anything

what a dumb statement. When you are travelling at 70 mph and get flipped into the air after you rub tires with someone else, you will probably reconsider putting a safety belt in your kart.

"Honda attempts to use lawnmower blades to gain the aerodynamic edge" (pun intended)

Man: "HONEY!!! You're supposed to be NAVIGATING"

Woman: "I am, this house wasn't here last time we drove this way"

Man: "Thats cause the map is UPSIDE DOWN"

Quote from mcintyrej :

The exhaust is THIS wide!

thats a good one

"Thanks MTV...for Pimpin' My Ride!"

voice of erckle: Did i do that?

Quote from Count Duckula :

I have chosen custom and played around a bit with some of the settings. It would seem that "Custom" is specific to each car because previous cars I had selected now seem to keep the settings however if I choose "In Car" it seems to carry through to all the cars.

i'm not sure if this is what you mean but...i have noticed that while racing in different cars, the field of view changes slightly. THe actualy FOV degree stays the same (90), but for example, if i hop into the gtr cars, it seems that i am farther back in the seat that in the xrt, fxo, lx6, fox or any other car. This only seems to happen in the GTR cars. Does anyone else have this problem or know how to fix it? It is actually more difficult for me to drive the GTR cars like this so instead, i use the wheel view.

if the limit really is only 240 seconds, then there is no need for this improvement because 4 mins is not too long to wait. On the other hand, if there is no limit, this is an excellent suggestiong

"i know my cupcake is SOMEWHERE in there"

"ugh not again..."

"now i know how those bugs on my windshield feel..."

Quote from mcintyrej :

Is that not exactly the same principle of the one your speaking of though?

If you half something, then half it again..It can never totally be gone. It will just remain a very very very very tiny fraction.

no, in my last post i explained that time is factor that archilles is forgetting. But you are right, the substance will never be gone, it will be infinitely small.

Quote from bbman :

It is mathematically right, and it also applies to real life... :doh: All of you forget that the interval where you check the distance between the two also halves... So yes, the runner will never overtake the turtle if don't give him the time to do it...

you are exactly right. Although you have implied it, i think what you are trying to say is, time. That is what the achilles or w/e didn't factor in. If there was no time, then yes, his theories would be correct. Same goes for the arrow that does not move. Of course it movies because there are new moments. Like he said, if you took a picture of the arrow, you freeze that MOMENT and therefore the arrow is standing still.
So in conclusion, all of the presented theories are true if time is negligible.

Quote from Cr!t!calDrift :

Odd thought...

that's chemistry for you!

"Is it winter already?"

or


-tour guide voice- "...and if you look to your right, you will see the beautiful town of ______........3000ft below"

Last edited by ans7812, Sun 24 Jun 2007, 20:26.