The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(903 results)
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from DeadWolfBones :Yeah, looked pretty ragged in that fast left-right. Pretty unusual for Seb.

It was cool!
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Mustangman759 :Wheres the lotus

Where's
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
His attempted lap to get into Q3 was pretty spectacular to watch on board. Shows a bit more visceral driving than the past.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
The LX8 was never supposed to be released content. I don't know why people keep talking about it, especially because LX6 racing is so rare (and always was except for a few niche leagues).
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
What I'm saying is that what people perceive to be "Android" is not the AOSP components, but the Google Apps components. You give an average user an AOSP only device and ask them to use it, their immediate complaint will be "How do I has Facebook".

That's how the GApps == Android works. To an average end user, given an AOSP device, will find it totally useless.

Nokia/Kindle Fire/etc devices which implement their own Market aren't bare AOSP devices as they do have some sort of market. They're still not really Android how most would perceive them, but they add enough functionality to be able to install Facebook for an average user.

Regardless, I've had this argument a kazillion times in IRC about how AOSP !== Android, and I'm not really prepared to repeat myself again for the kazillionth time.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Stig209 :Seems like I'm the only one who's not happy about Vettel failing.

You are.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Matrixi :What? That's is complete drivel.

AOSP - Android Open Source Project. Android by definition is nothing more than the operating system itself. First time I've heard anyone say a phone has to have GApps installed to be classified as Android.

\/ You mean Samsung phones, shadowww?

Perhaps this article will make it more clear how AOSP !== Android. It's even worse now because the ****ing home screen isn't even opensource anymore

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets ... e-by-any-means-necessary/

Google is actually trying to make AOSP an unsustainable effort by removing any semblance of updates to the core apps, and instead forking them and only updating them as closed source items.

Quote from E.Reiljans :Speaking of rootkits
Android phones are doing great at that front
http://redmine.replicant.us/pr ... iki/SamsungGalaxyBackdoor

By definition, Google Apps is actually a rootkit. It hides itself deep in the OS, and has unfettered access to the entire platform to install updates at its will (separate from actual Market updates).
Last edited by dawesdust_12, .
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Matrixi :That's why the AOSP Browser is king, as the name implies it's fully open source. I'd never infect any device I own with Chrome.

GApps package is optional, it's not mandatory for Android to function. There are open source alternatives available for all the apps that it contains. So, you can have a fully open source Android installation if you wish, I mostly care about my web browser not spying on me at every single step.

Well, for it to be "Android" the GApps package is mandatory. Else it is just AOSP. Most people think of "Android" to be the services that the GApps package jackhammers in, not the actual core OS.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Has Scawen really changed his plans that much though other than timeframe? The things that have been on the docket for some time are still tyre physics, Scirocco and Rockingham.

The things that have been "distractions" are either things to fix a imminent problem (DX9 support because AMD cards are ****ing up at DX8) or things that interest Scawen like proper VR support. Something that is important as a developer, is that if you're in a state where you're unmotivated, doing a "personal interest" project can renew your motivation on a greater project.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from The Very End :But other normal developers, indies and not, announce what they work on specifiq. They also changes adds/removes through the development, but instead ScaViEr beeing really poor at learning how to filter the usefull information and feedback from the community. They killed off the whole thing by ignoring the community which made this game to what it is today.

It's actually quite simple, ignore the worst whiners and focus your energy on the ones worth your time. Not treat us all like fools by giving out one statement each year "working on stuff, secret you can't see". It worked in 2008-2009, but not anymore.

Other developers get into similar situations as Scavier, but for whatever ****ing reason, this community takes every baited breath as a promise. Other communities go "oh cool, developer is planning this".

The LFS community (at least a subset, for whatever reason, probably brain damage) takes it as this promise and expectation that they are entitled to whatever was announced.

That's the difference between other developers and LFS. Other communities are a lot less conceited and entitled to whatever the developer mentions as a potential feature.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from cathal50cc :Im just after reading alot of this thread... the argueing isint working would it not be better for us all or a large quantity of us to ask the developers nicely.

Problem is, if Scawen gives any kind of time estimation, everyone jumps on it like a slut on a dick and proceeds to treat it like a promise and that they're entitled to whatever was "promised". As infuriating as it is, silence is actually better because then the retards don't treat everything as a promise and instead just rage on each other over past "promises".
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Matrixi :TIL closed source browser by a company that is in bed with NSA is a good thing.

Chrome is technically closed source. We can build Chromium, but who knows what is bundled into the actual "Chrome" version that Google distributes.

Same as Android. It's closed source. People can only compile AOSP, but Google can include whatever rootkits or misc technology into the "Google Apps" kit.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from dekojester :https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17343551/DekoPC.JPG (Fil Diaz selected the bits because my head exploded when trying to decide what to go for)

So fairly similar to my PC that I built, except I went for a better CPU.

I get 100 FPS in AC.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from dekojester :I have departed with US$1081 and change on components for a new PC so that I may be able to use this piece of software.

God halp all those in AC

Specs?
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from E.Reiljans :Is it just me or Android still has not grasped concept of usability?

Nope, you're right on the money.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
So Bose, you know what we have to do...

Lets just send them a vibrator, Tell them that you duct tape it to your wheel and adjust it to your liking, and it simulates the cars engine vibration. Watch as they review it swimmingly!
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Kristi :What does calling out a fact do with iRacing fanboyism? Oh gosh...

Have you ever watched their "show"?


Airquotes because it's really just a giant advert.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Another series for me to noob up again
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from OTone :"Live for Speed is know known as Left For Dead" By: Simracingtonight. Spot on!

Not really.. They have iRacing's dicks shoved so far down their throat, it's coming out of their ass. They don't even try to fake it, they wear about as much iRacing apparel as humanly possible. It might as well be called "iRacingTonight" for their blatant biases.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from cargame.nl :Pff go bump 6+ year old threads?
--
Bandwidth killer, lag generator, bad idea.

Again, the eternal forum Catch 22. You get flamed if you bump an old thread, but you get flamed for posting a new thread and get told to search.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Whiskey :Valve Publically Releases &quo ... ; Direct3D-to-OpenGL Shim



Maybe this could be interesting for Scawen. I get lost when things go too deep into technical stuff, but I think this may be a great step forward to support Linux natively.

Again, supporting Linux is not just about the graphics. There's so many other components that are required that just don't work on Linux like FFB wheels.

Wine does good enough, and going native Linux doesn't add anything except more complexity to the end users experience (and break other shit).
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
All my answers are Sutil.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from Hotdogxx60 :Alright you buggers!


I've bitten the bullet and loaded steam and I am currently downloading AC.

With Australian internet, you might have it downloaded by S3 release.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
I guess it depends on your GPU. With my AMD card in my laptop, I could set it up to use 2 monitors for a triple screen setup. nVidia forces 3 equal surfaces for a multi monitor setup.
dawesdust_12
No longer welcome
Quote from tristancliffe :But if Steam/Valve cease trading, how are you expecting to get 'what you own'?

If a games DRM servers go down (like GFWL did), how are you supposed to activate your software?

the GFWL thing is actually quite amusing (terrible) because most of the games that integrated it required it for saving, so GTA4 doens't even work for saving because of GFWL being killed.

Some games (Batman Arkham Asylum) have gone and re-released on Steam (free for previous owners) a non-GFWL version, but some never will and will be broken forever.

At this point, the idea of "licensing" your games has never been stronger. It's about being smart enough to not purchase from services that are likely to cease to exist. I think it's pretty safe at this point that it would take a HUGE event for Steam to go out of business, and I'm sure (considering all of their other wise choises) that they do have an exit strategy in the unlikely case that it happens.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG