so since you understand why i gave that split, why did you say the previous things?
a 70gbp set of speakers will rattle and resonate badly (needing 50gbp in stands) because... brace for it... they are 70gbp worth of speakers and their enclosure will suck!!!
if you can't spend 150 on a set of speakers (entry level KEF/AE or whatever floats around this year) you aren't talking about a "hifi" set. you're talking about a glorified pc speaker set.
instead of 300 for a system that has 70 worth of speakers (the most sensitive component of audio and the second most important aspect of sound reproduction that is actually under your control) get a selfpowered set of speakers and a high quality, external, sound card.
wtf
70gbp for speakers
my 5.1 logitech set of crap was that much
spending 150 on an amp to drive 70 worth of speakers?
considering the voltage supply of every card is the same (12V from the 4/6/8 pin and whatever else it gets from the pcie slot) what difference does it make to talk about a card's power consumption in watts or say that it demands that many amps?
also, you will almost never hear that a 4850 is a 10A card. but you will hear that the 4850 is a 120W card.
besides, when talking about power (measured in Watts) you can't talk about amperes.
in the end, the 3850 is a 65W card. peak. if the 220 psu were of good quality it would be OK under certain circumstances.
it's like getting a golf 2.0 and putting 40gbp dunlops on it.
and ok maybe i would accept it (not that it matters and yeah i know i might sound patronising and/or condescending but this is not what i am after, please believe me) but you suggested 50gbp for stands? for 70gbp speakers? maybe if it were 70gbp *per speaker* and 50gbp for *all* stands, ok...
ok get an entry level NAD for pre/power and the rest of the money on speakers.
with with 70 quid speakers are you sure you will hear the difference between a 100 150 and 200 quid amp? my guess is not.
maybe i'm behind the times, but 50% of the budget on speakers (2) 20% on source (1) 20% on amp (1) 9% on cables etc, 1% on chocolate (2).
every system sounds better when you're eating chocolate.
it's either a socket A or a socket 478.
either way it has an agp slot
if you really don't want to get a new pc
you can get something like an ati 4650
for cpu, there are options. you can buy used.
for socket A your best bet would be one of the mobile barton variety, clocked to hell.
for socket 478... i dunno, i'm a DAAMiT guy :P
your first comment in this thread was irrelevant, unproductive, unhelpful, bordering on trolling. in other words, you made the comment solely for your own pleasure without thinking what would be beneficial at that point. in one word, idiotic, from the greek word "ιδιώτης" which alludes to "considering only one's self". in more common parlance, "malakas".
we all anticipate, with mouths agape, for dawesdust's next reality-shattering revelation.
have mercy upon our frail minds, dawesdust, for not one of us mere mortals are able to withstand the immense density of thought your superior intellect is capable of.
we quake in terror for the day you decide to not hold back anymore and, with no observable effort, nullify our existence.
my mobo has 4 ports on the back and 4 headers (8 ports) on the mobo.
in any case, i wouldn't buy an alienware pc. Those who want to buy those are guys who have more money than sense or abilities and want to impress at lan parties without actually touching their hardware.
also forget about keeping the pc for 7-8 years.
even if you now get something ridiculously powerful and expensive... like three or four cards in sli/crossfire, you would still last like... 3 years? something like that. during 2006 we had the 7 series nvidia cards.
also, 10 years ago i had a celeron 433 with a tnt2 and i could play quake 2 so they were not completely worthless. for net browsing and stuff it would be ok even now. not great or good, just "ok". (with proper configuration and tweaking)