check the connectors and cables

besides:

Quote from dougie-lampkin :

4Ghz??? You realise that that's twice the standard clock? Good luck

yeah and where's the problem?

for those who are sceptical, the card still runs perfectly after all these years, in my gf's pc.

sage

i hate GC. automation of memory management when you are struggling to keep absolute control is not welcome in my book.

as for the initial question, i don't think it matters how many KB is the source code, but it matters what are those KB of code. Anyone can write 500 files with 6MB of code.

scawen managed to fit in that space, one of the best racing simulators ever

bump, for those who feel like reading a little bit and thinking a little more

you sure it's not your monitor?

did you really try dxtweak? yeah. a new wheel will be the best solution. what i suggested is really good only because it's cheap

adding another half a gig won't make much of a difference in a game that doesn't use more than 300MB.

Quote from squidhead :

Which nationality am I?

1) where did you go to school?
2) what kind of customs did your parents 'teach' you?

hell yeah

wanker.

(what? he said so.)

Quote from Davidos93 :

(my favourite racing combo is FOX WE1, but i'm a cruiser primarily)

also known as the "barely ever braking" combo lol

they need to start selling little g25s

Quote from tristancliffe :

You can do what you like with DXTweak, but that doesn't make what you want any more possible within LFS itself which is what we've all be talking about.

regarding this one, garph gave the answer from the beginning, that it can be done from within lfs, but i didn't understand what he said so i ignored what he said because at the moment what he said didn't make sense to me (sorry garph, but the way you said it... wasn't clear to me)

Quote from rich uk :

George You sir are a moron.

for solving something that most others said it was useless and impossible?

Quote from rich uk :

Next time you want help don't just insult the people genuinly trying to help you.

who did i insult, that was trying to help me? the only one who actually helped was garph (he gave the solution, but the way he said it i did not understand it. others gave ideas, but i didn't insult anyone who said logical things. ), but i didn't insult him. if he feels insulted, that's a misunderstanding.

Quote from rich uk :

Saying the same thing over and over won't help,

when did i repeat myself? perhaps you are confusing me with s14drift who keeps saying it can't be done, when i have explained how to do it, have posted a picture and a video.

Quote from rich uk :

It probably means people didn't understand what the hell you were going on about at the start.

you mean, just like you, right now, who hasn't understood what the hell has been going on in the thread?

Quote from rich uk :

Even when you did get good help you say that was right and you were wrong and then insult them saying they were talking shit.

you claim that someone helped me, i said he was right and then i said they were talking shit? you mean... they helped me... then i said they are right... and i said they talk shit... how is that even possible? when did that happen? can you point me to the exact messages?

Quote from rich uk :

These forums could do with less twunts like yourself.

twunt... it's like... twat+****? you are wasting your creativity to create cusswords. that isn't really appropriate.

Quote from rich uk :

This forum used to be a very friendly place but now (thanks to people like you) it's just a place to go bashing other peoples views.

what views? you mean... those who say that it is impossible? it's not my fault their view was just plain wrong. if you say that 1+1=7 and i say you are wrong, that doesn't mean i am bashing your view. your view is wrong. the end.

Quote from garph :

I said that ages ago!

Have you just been taking the piss with this thread? Or hanging around lerts' threads too much?

i did not understand what you said, at all. simple as that. that is why i did not reply. As for your other comments, they are not really appropriate.

i just noticed that the same end result can be achieved by limiting the maximum lock setting.

so it was easier than even i initialy thought.

Quote from MAD3.0LT :

i feel absloutly retarted

it's ok, we don't mind you're retarded.

Quote :

after reading such a dumb ass thread

noone forced you.

Quote :

save ur time effort and that sell the momo

what? are you farting on the keyboard?

Quote :

cause that would feel unrealistic

unrealistic? in a real car, when you turn the steering wheel 120 degrees clockwise, the wheels don't go full lock right. they turn to the position that corresponds to the steering wheel turned 120 degrees clockwise.

in lfs, if you have a momo wheel, you turn the momo 120 degrees clockwise and the lfs car behaves as if you've turned its wheel full lock right. this is not realistic. besides, when racing you are probably doing something wrong if you need more than 240degrees lock-to-lock.

Quote from Patussay :

if looking at the wheel turning faster you can either get a wheel with 720º+ degrees or just turn off the view of the wheel...

sooo if i turn off the graphics, the car's wheels will not go to full lock anymore if i turn just 120degrees? you didn't even read the thread, i think.

Quote :

And... what kind of ROAD car has 240º degrees wheel?

Well... what kind of ROAD car goes full lock when you turn its wheel 120degrees?

Quote :

Anyway, putting the comp in "1.00" will make the LFS wheel turn almost the same as your physic wheel... at least for the first couple of degrees =P

thank you, but it doesn't matter anymore. if you noticed, i found the way to do what i wanted, and i posted a pic too.

Quote :

just an "eye candy" (not quite) feature, and as i said before you can always "turn off" the LFS steering wheel so you can't see it turning faster.

you and others still think it is about the display. it isn't.

i tried that just after the thread started. it doesn't work. it is very nonlinear. <- this reply is to jj, not general.

this is a small silly clip showing what exactly is going on.

http://rapidshare.com/files/15 ... 4/the_impossible.avi.html

dum de dum

thanks generAL

Last edited by george_tsiros, Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:33.

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

Then you must have fibbed. You said you wanted it so if you turned your wheel 90 degrees it'd turn the wheel in game 90 degrees. With your wheel that is impossible. So either you're lying or you didn't explain. Anyway, I couldn't care. *rubs G25 all over my naked oiled body*. Time for bed?

i turn the wheel 90 degrees and the car's wheel turns 90 degrees too.

i don't know what i can be possibly not explaining, what with it being so simple.

and no i am not lying, the picture is proof that it can be done and now i am recording a video too.

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

It can't be done.

i don't know what you are trying to imply, considering that i did what i wanted from the start.

Quote from JJ72 :

i just set my G25 to 720 degrees, so the game wheel fully syncronize with the real wheel, I can't even leave the pitbox without doing a 3 point turn.

you are either not doing what you say you are doing, or you are doing it incorrectly, because 720 degrees is normal for the car. you don't use less actual lock. are you sure you aren't forgetting something?

Quote from JJ72 :

more than 200 degrees of lock? either that or you lost me. but DXtreak can't achieve that,

funny though you still insist it can't be done when i showed exactly how it can be done. (i configured only the left, so one can see how it differs from the 'normal' setting.)

the thread is over. i asked for something. some people said it can't be done. noone said how it can be easily done. i did it. all the rest are useless comments.

Quote from tristancliffe :

Why are you being such a **** tonight George?

Quote from JJ72 :

turn off the virtual wheel then.

simple

in your IRL car... when you turn the wheel less than half a turn to the left (120 degrees), it locks full left? odd.