The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(982 results)
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Becky the questions your are asking have answers buried deep inside the very nature of being a human. And no scientist has really started to scratch the surface yet.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
... and when it goes wrong... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... 7lELI&feature=related

**** me!
Intrepid
S3 licensed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-rM_BzFmM8

that same track but with 18yr in a 500hp Subaru... seriously ****ing mental.

WTF moment at 2:03
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from RiseAgainstMe! :Yes, I get that. Except apparently it doesn't allow emergency vehicles to get to accidents from the accounts here.

We have an area for the same purpose, but it's not designated as a lane at all. It's not part of the road. This way people don't try to do what happens in this video, and the emergency vehicle is free.

What happens in this video is quite rare. It's just dumb idiots.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from Hyperactive :Bulgarian Touring Car Championship
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs39SwcRhbg

Nice looking track

That's just mental.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from RiseAgainstMe! :I get that. I wasn't talking about the rules of the lane. I was saying that it was more complicated because there doesn't seem to be any benefit to that lane actually existing in the first place.

I don't know about you, but when you add a lane and receive no additional benefit from it, or seemingly it causes issues, then that's a system that's more complicated than it needs to be.

It's somewhere to park if your car breaks down, and it allows emergency vehicles to get to accidents without being blocked.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from BlueFlame :I think that's a pretty reasonable explaination to be honest, given the nature of messages seen on BBM, and their attitude, **** DA PO-LEEC YO

That's like blaming WW2 on Robert Wagner. It's just nonsense.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
You can never question Verstappen's commitment to racing. Head first into the tyres and still carries on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNd6jAO6lsE
Intrepid
S3 licensed
No, people don't drive in it like another lane. When the traffic is flowing normally the rules are respected.

It's that in this instance there was a crash on the motorways causing a big jam. Like sheep a lot of drivers decided to park themselves on the hard shoulder. Stupid I know.

On some motorways electronic traffic control will show signs saying the hard shoulder can be used, but this is clearly sign posted. In this case, like idiot sheep, a load of drivers illegally took to the hard shoulder probably because they think they could
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from gezmoor :I consider myself to lean strongly to the left politically but if I hear one more person excuse this behaviour by claiming it's down to poverty and lack of oportunity I'm going to scream !! I'm in Brazil at the moment and I think every single one of the rioting pratts should be flown over here and dumped in the middle of a Rio favella and then told.. this is poverty.. this is lack of oportunity.. what's your excuse? I'm with Itrepid on this one, (not often I can say that), the only "poverty" that people in the UK suffer is one of "poverty of luxury", I don't believe for a second that any of these rioters come from families where there is such a lack of money that they can't afford to eat for example. None of these people are desperate to survive, not a single one of them will sell their stolen goods to buy food or pay the rent or bills etc. I have absolutely no sympathy with their actions, because there is zero justification for them. No jobs? no seriously, there are jobs, just not ones that they would ever consider lowering themselves to do. leave those jobs to the immigrants, working in mac donalds is beneath them despite the fact they may have never done a days work in their lives. For those involved that do have jobs etc all I can say is "shame on you".

I say send them all to the most poverty stricken places on earth to learn a lesson.

I've seen a couple of reports suggesting that EMA reform (which still provides funds for the less-wealthy students) was a reason why some rioted (which is complete bollocks). But it really does make a mockery of welfare if it's basically a bribe to stop people rioting. "What's you job?" "Well basically I get paid not to riot." Also what is even more frustrating is people blaming hip-hop!

I think in retrospect what I witnessed was quite a large mix of people looting. The fact is if people think they can get away with stealing something, quite a large chunk of them would actually risk it - rich or not so rich.
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from RiseAgainstMe! :How very.... German

But seriously, why even have this lane? Have a wide soft shoulder, everyone stops, emergency vehicle uses the shoulder, or comes up from the wrong direction. People won't drive on the soft shoulder, because it's not all cementy and they don't want to get their SUV's dirty. Works just fine.

Are you allowed to use this lane for normal driving in the UK, and it's just that you can't stop in it? Or is it not used for driving, and people have deliberately gone out of their way to get into this lane and stop?

The hard shoulder lane is for broken down vehicles or emergency vehicles. It must be kept clear at all times apart from when direction by traffic control.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
http://youtu.be/UkbGbS7QhlI

JOs is such a nutter. That's how you do an F1 demo. None of this start stop doughnut bollox.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Sucker Punch - Bit of a weird one. At times felt like a great kids action movie and then suddenly it becomes a hollow mix of violence and prostitution.
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
I'd like to echo Becky. The advertising system Google uses is superb.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from DevilDare :Source code

Not bad. Not bad at all.

Deffo a DVD film.

Watched Your Highness - My expectations were very low, and despite no big laughs it was watchable and I am a sucker for the occasional bit of toilet humour.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Well they did do what all left-wing governments do. Work brilliantly until they run out of other people's natural resources or money.

Actually, when looking at these riots we are only talking about several thousand people here. That means 59,995,000 didn't riot. I guess we can credit Mrs Thatcher's philosophy of personal responsibility for the the majority who didn't wreck their community.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from RiseAgainstMe! :would that million dollars be better spent on another beach house or on any number of useful services that our government provides for us?

Well if the wealthy weren't allowed to be wealthy that million dollars wouldn't exist in the first place...duh You'd get a situation like Venezula where thousands of businesses were shut. Or Britain in the 70s when all the wealthy people fled and the country when open handed to the IMF. You really don't want that.

If yo over tax people hmrc can actually see a reduction in revenues.
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from 5haz :What was the original context then? I can't see how "there is no such thing as society" can be construed in any other way. The gist of it is we shouldn't ask for assistance from anyone and we should help only our families first, at least that's true to conservative values, unfortunately Maggie was too detached from the people she ruled over to realise some people have no way of helping themselves. 24 years later and nothing has changed, the vast majority of a states problems stem the ignorance of its leaders about the population they lead.

"I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it. 'I have a problem, I'll get a grant.' 'I'm homeless, the government must house me.' They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbour. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation."

So she does say there is a duty to help our neighbour. Within context the quote isn't as point blank as "there's no such thing as society". So to help others, first you must help yourself. She merely said that 'society' is a concept people depend on but it's ignorant to the fact that what your really depending on is individual people and families. Hardly a radical thought. But let's not allow context to get in the way of a good soundbite.

At least Maggie had the balls to say the state DOESN'T have an answer to everything. A politician who openly admitted they don't always have the answer. Maggie was no shrinking violet, but at least she was honest. You knew where you stood, unlike every politician who followed her.

My crowd pleasing comment was squarely aimed at Brand. his article/blog post was aimed at the Guardian. It contained everything you need to please the young naive student audience

1. Blame Thatcher
2. Blame Thatcher
3. Don't mention 13 years of Labour
4. Blame Thatcher
5. Blame Thatcher
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from Rappa Z :It should be noted that when you tax the rich all the money the government picks up is put back into your country. If the wealthy keep their money, they don't necessarily invest in there country. Instead, there money goes overseas to economies that are actually growing.

... and the UK and USA don't have massive aid budgets or aren't involved in any wars? The UK has to send quite a large amount of money to the EU, IMF etc...

If Governments were better at investing money than citizens then the Soviet Union, along with N Korea and Cuba would be the world's most powerful economies (they are not). Hence why Cuba and N Korea reluctantly have to turn a blind eye to private trade in certain circumstances. China adopted capitalism (though not entirely free-market) and that's worked out pretty good for them.

Cross country trade and investment is essential in a global economy. Protectionism is a bad way to go.
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from 5haz :You know your politicians have ... king more sense than them, why am I posting mostly Guardian articles? Because they're the only mainstream UK paper that's talking any sense at all.

From that article

Quote :I remember Cameron saying "hug a hoodie" but I haven't seen him doing it

That's just amazing. Brand remembers something that actually didn't happen (it was Labour who coined the phrase). So just to get one (of many) things straight there.

You only think the Guardian makes any sense because you buy up 100% to their agenda, which they do have. Not once in that article does he mention 13 years of Labour rule... because Labour can't have any responsibility for the absolute GIGANTIC cock up they made of pretty much everything.

Anyway, then Brand blames Thatcher, how so predictable.

The contradiction now - On one hand the problem IS political according to Brand

Quote :These young people have no sense of community because they haven't been given one. They have no stake in society because Cameron's mentor Margaret Thatcher told us there's no such thing.

(that's taking the no society quote out of context. Poor writing)

but the solution is not political

Quote : But I know, as we all intuitively know, the solution is all around us and it isn't political, it is spiritual. Gandhi said: "Be the change you want to see in the world."

So really, this article (which I came across before it was published on the Guardian) makes no sense at all. It goes round in circles and contradicts itself.

It's a shame because often the Guardian can be quite enlightening and provide a different viewpoint, but this article isn't it. It's poorly written and is nothing more than a predictable crowd pleasing load of rubbish. He may as well have just said

"I hate Thatcher

Give the kids Krishnamurti to read

End"

Woulda been 10x better.
Last edited by Intrepid, .
Intrepid
S3 licensed
I wouldn't recommend investing more than 20-30% of your savings into gold because it is a risk, like anything. You have to diversify. So don't feel too bad. I took a big risk, and it paid off, but that's because I'm stupid
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from xaotik :Like controlling water as a commodity, or genetic use restriction technology in grains, or the deep sea fishing industry, or coffee plantations all over the third world, or oil firms all around the world, or sweatshops in the Far East, etc - the list of exploitation just goes on and on. I think you just accept too many things in a black/white fashion and rather naively.

... and of course a lot of those things is interlinkied with state-subsidies and state-monopolies.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from JJ72 :not in hong kong mate, it had never fell since 4 years ago. And is only going to get higher. Even if you just buy it with mortgage and rent it out, you are still making quite a cut, the demand outweighs supply by a long shot and it's because they are holding it back to boost the price.

Earning money is very easy when you have some, but really hard when you have none.

They said about the UK housing market for years..... then POP.
Intrepid
S3 licensed
Quote from Glenn67 :Once all the commentators and public are saying gold is the best investment I'd advise you to sell pretty quick if history is anything to go by

Well, we're still quite a way from it's historic high of $2500 (adjusted for inflation) so we've got a fair way to go before we're in bubble territory. There were a fair few investors saying gold was the best investment a few years ago. I bought then when it was around $700 an ounce. It's now $1750 When it gets to 2500 I'll start thinking harder
Intrepid
S3 licensed
They've fizzled out. They are probably playing with their new toys
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG