The one thing that drives me up the wall is the amount of people in the media, or just people I know who were all too keen to slag her off when the whole celebrity big brother thing blew up, but now say that we have to treat her as some sort of saint who has never done any wrong - the hypocrisy is incredible
sad she died, I wouldn't wish cancer upon anyone and having had two of my friends lose parents to cancer at a young age it's not pleasant. I totally, absolutely 100% disagreed with the way she and her publicist conducted the whole thing though, if I was in her shoes instead of stringing it out for as long as possible I would have wanted to spend as much time as I could in private with my kids, not paraded in front of the media circus. I guess this kind of funeral was to be expected though, otherwise the people who rely solely upon Heat magazine and the Sun for their daily news and views would be a bit upset
there are many worse songs, but that is right up there in the most annoyingly bad songs of all time, I thought the ginner's music taste was better than that
I haven't bothered reading his recent ones, I'm so appalled at the sweeping generalisations he made earlier in this thread that his posts on this subject aren't worth reading any more. He has a differing opinion, yes, but I am free to counter that with my own arguments. That generalisation he made in a previous post shocked me, although knowing the sort of stuff I do to entertain me I should be used to the sweeping generalisations levelled at both me and the communities I hang around with.
Do I take this too seriously? Probably. What I don't like seeing though is someone with what seems to be a good knowledge of the finer side of art, sculptures and that lot, coming in and spouting what is an absolute load of crap and expecting to get away with it without someone countering his argument.
Oh wait he can, he's a mod. Lets all obey our mod overlords. Infraction me, I don't care
agreed...obviously SamH knows best because he's had time to grow up around 'fine art'...comparing 'fine art' to graffiti is like comparing chalk and cheese. The two are completely different artforms and as such should never be used in a comparison. Frankly, I don't give a toss if SamH spent his life around highly skilled, professional sculptors/artists. What I dislike is the absolutely sweeping generalisations he put in that post on the previous page. What SamH is failing to see is that most, if not all, of the really very artistic and stylish pieces painted, the ones that take the longest amount of time to do, are either in places where it has been legalised (I remember the middle school I went to backed onto a skatepark, and nearly every week there'd be something different painted there) or are comissioned by the council. Take for example that blue building I posted pics of on page 1. That whole building used to be covered in an amazing mural (its now covered with loads of hand prints) and the a section of the whole road has been comissioned for graffiti art, and it looks brilliant
all I get are 503 errors lol
agreed more than 100%. Well said.
edit - to add, I find most of what the 'modern artists' produce nowadays to be absolute tosh. People like Damien Hirst, Anthony Gormley, Tracy Emin that sort of stuff, that is not proper art. It's weird for the sake of weird. Some people like that, and some people like graffiti. I don't spout not only misguided, but offensive stereotypes about the kinds of people who create a messy bed and call it art? I have a messy bed in my room but I don't stick it in an art gallery?
what there is to know here is that I'm not talking about the 'taggers'. I dislike the tags/throw-ups as much as you - they make a place look a mess. What I am talking about, and what you seem incapable of grasping, is the skill required to create those intricate, inter-woven/deformed lettering styles used by many artists. It's not just something everybody can do, it takes a hell of a lot of practise believe me.
I think you'll find a little thing called the 'broken window' theory comes into play here - people see a broken window and think 'oh this place mustn't be well looked after, I ight as well dump my waste/graffiti/whatever here as a) I'm not likely to be caught and b) it'll be a long time until it is cleaned up', and as more people notice the degeneration more stuff gets dumped, graffitied or whatever. I'm not a huge fan of the 'tagging' side of things, the throw-ups, stuff like that. What I do like, whether it is in a legal place or not, are properly artistic forms of lettering, or people. As long as it is done skillfully - I'm not talking about 16 year old 'artists' with marker pens here - it really does brighten up otherwise dull streets and some of the skill involved in the painting of some of the pieces I've seen is astonishing
my god if I could invent a device to punch people in the face over the internet, I would use it right now. Although I actually agree it has gone a long way off the 'revolution' side of things, what you have posted there is absolute first class A-Grade BOLLOCKS. Full of the sweeping generalisations I am all too familiar with and have grown up around (banger racers = pikies, graffiti artists= drug fuelled....) and it shows either how naive, or misguided, you are. Please come back when you have a better understanding of the subject