Good strategy. I like it. But I assume the IS_PIT packet be reset once the player is out of pitlane. But he still can be overtaken in the gap between leaving pits and rejoining the track, as he is still accelerating and not yet up to SC speed (right?). So there may still be false alarms. But this is an edge case IMO
This may feel like a redundant post but it is not. What is the effect of the combination of ABS+Brake help. We have 4 scenarios for BH ON/OFF and ABS ON/OFF put together.
I tried straight line braking with these 4 scenarios in RB4, but could not conclusively find a difference. I somehow felt the BH OFF/ABS ON had reduced braking distance as opposed to BH ON/ABS OFF scenario. Probably coz ABS is more optimized than BH.
But what does the game do when both are ON, does it make the brake more conservative by adding up the effects of ABS and BH? or does both work independently using the feedback of grip levels etc and it is a case of whichever is faster kind of strategy?
Is there a way to change font of the interface? I am asking this 'coz in the current font, a and o are very similar, making it difficult to read. It would be better to have a font whose a is like a inTimes new Roman as opposed to the a in Century Gothic
Expected reply. For the record many do, I do, as a reference, and even many expert racers use it as a reference. And anyways its a feature so it has to work as expected hehee
I knew I could count on Daniel for this post Anyways I reproduced the bug. The steps are a bit different from my OP.
FXR @ AS5 GP chicane
1. First took FXR fresh. Saw brake point at GP chicane. It was late brake point, after turn in
2. Changed to XRR. GP chicane brake point seems to be same as FXR (this itself may be wrong)
3. Now changed again to FXR. Saw brake point at GP chicane. Brake point is much earlier, as if it was XRR(I think).
It seems like the change in brake point targetted at XRR happened when I changed back to FXR from XRR. As if there is a one step lag between changing cars and changing brake point/racing line.
See the attached pic.
1. Top half has fresh FXR with late brake points after 50 m mark of AS5 GP chicane
2. Bottom half has again FXR, but after changing to XRR and then changing back to FXR, with early brake points (probably that of XRR) much before the 50 m mark. In fact you see the brake point in the rear view mirror.
This could mean that the racing line/brake point shown is for the previous car we selected :O
Oh then how come it changed racing line(break points) for me when using different sets in same car? both sets have no handicaps. Both sets are standard FXR. Is it a bug? or an unintended feature ? :P
I was racing with FXR. First I used a set with minimum wings and long gear ratios. The brake points in the displayed racing line were conservative(early) due to the increased approach speed and lesser cornering ability I think. Then I used a set with more wings and shorter gear ratios. The brake points were more aggressive(late). Is the displayed racing line taking into account all the factors in the setup? like downforce, gear ratios etc. If that is the case, then it awesome. I just thought it adjusts line according to engine power/restrictions alone.
yeah no probs Also let me confirm this, except finalising the row for the heat winners and LCQ winners, others are ordered as per the pre-qual time, not the heat position. So it does n't matter if you are 2nd in heat or 7th in heat, am I right? One could be at no 7 in heat, but he may take position 5(row 2) if he is very fast in pre-quali right? Interesting
Yes dude, there is nothing wrong with 7*4+2, that is the expected one, my point was about the changing the OP to 4 so that it becomes 7*4+2 That is why I asked "Shoud n't this be 4?"
But what about someone spins under SC, and may be only 1-2 people pass him coz he was at the back 2-3 places? But according to me even a blind comparison is OK. False +ves by the tool is ok, admin can review it IMO. Main requirement is admin don't want to miss any cheeky overtakes under SC I think. The proposed solutions(even the simplest one above) should do the job IMO.