Two tomatoes in the freezer:

- Hey dude! What's up!
- Damn it! A speaking tomatoe! :faint2:

Quote from Shotglass :

buddhism is essentially an atheistic religion

Being estricts only Theravada can be considered as atheistic, but yes, buddhism is not about a creator, omnipresent, powerful God, but it's a religion with their non-proved believes and it's moral guides, etc... (sorry if I can't be more accurate in what I want to say... not so much level of english for it ).

Quote from flymike91 :

Its just when people say that religion is the number one killer or a disease I think that they are usually thinking about Islam, not christianity, but carry on I respect your point.

I don't think so. When you lose your faith (and so gain new knowledge and objective view of the life) you usually don't make distinctions between religions when talking about their basis. In fact, talking about civil wars and faith wars christianity have the lead by far. Islam in the other hand has a very lack in basic human rights in it's most fundamentalist sectors, as it have not evolved too much with society

Quote from flymike91 :

Now that I think about, what really makes me angry is that Islam gives all religion a bad name

:ices_rofl you always got a smile in my face!

Quote from flymike91 :

the name on which non-believers base their arguments.

False, and I can say it as I'm a non-believer

Quote from flymike91 :

For specificity, I'd rather hear things like "christians believe..." or "Muslims believe..." rather than "religious people believe..." I don't expect to have to make the same distinctions between atheists because there aren't any "sects" of atheism.

But in the end muslims, christians, buddhist, etc... all of them believe in a very close way... A supreme being creator of the world, who dictates the right behaviour and believings, etc, etc...

So you can have different forms of adoring your God, and different views of the right behaviour, but all of you get your thoughts from the same source: ancient book, lots of blind faith, and none of questioning on things (and a lot of "they're wrong, poor them")

Quote from flymike91 :

I'm not sure how this strayed off topic so far. We're supposed to be talking about polygamy.
-1 for polygamy

Can a "-1 for polygamy" be considered as a talk?

Quote from flymike91 :

-1

for polygamy

Deja
vu

Yep, we heard you before

Quote from flymike91 :

In the US, polygamy has caused too many problems to keep around. Most polygamists have historically lived in communes or compounds in utah or oregon and have had problems with forcing minors to marry and have sex. It's like communism, seems fine on paper but nobody does it right.

:monkey::uglyhamme:something

Oh man... you really are one of the best things on this forum... almost every post from you gets me rotfl really hard!

But this one is really nice!

Anyway... it's nice to see but diesel cars are yet squids

Just found these ones around there... it seems he actually hit Alonso twice





Too much hours spent on PS3 for wonder boy I think :ices_rofl

Quote from DTrott :

When I compared prices it was for a GTS. I still couldn't get a quote.

But this is the UK, so insurance probably alot here.

Do you have a minimum insurance level ("thirds" is called in Spain)?

Also here in Spain if you present three (I think there was only three) official denies of quotes from insurance agencies then the State will cover your insurance as it's mandatory to cover the minimum . Anyway... private agencies instead of denying the insurance they give you prohibited prizes

But for sure insurances are expensive in the U.K for what I'm seeing... I'm paying 340€ (per year) for a 1.5 V-Tec 1999 Civic Sedan (115cv)

Quote from sam93 :

No, it's just a little joke, because it is mainly classes as a womans car and when you see I see a man drive on I say that, because it is normally a girls car. Why be ashamed to drive it, if you like the car you can drive it.

This is what I call a girls car

Quote from flymike91 :

we like to hope there is, or else we're all just tiger food.

That question is a fundamental difference between the religious and the non

We meaning who?
I really don't mind as I'm sure there is not such ultimate goal

And I'm happpy I don't believe such a thing... if it exists that goal for sure I'm not working to achieve it (and that would make me afraid :schwitz

Have you any clue about what goal is that or are you waiting to meet the maker to ask him?

Quote from flymike91 :

Shotglass do you truly feel that science can explain our purpose on earth? X+Y=Man's ultimate goal in the universe?

And why it's supposed to exists an ultimate goal for human existence in the universe?

Quote from sam93 :

A MX-5 is a cliturus car because every C**ts got one. Just added that said that to a few men who have had one, said it to someone when I was in hospital who had one, he didn't know where to look and his mates just laughed at him.

Do you mean I would turn in a complete **** being ashamed of my penis and worried about my mates' words if I own a MX-5?

Don't get the point of the hairdresser's car stuff... I think... maybe for being a spanish "macho" I'm not measuring my penis with my car

Would anyone care to explain or give me a list of those-called hairdresser's cars?
I think I can't get the real sense of the expression, but I'm afraid may I change my ocuppation as each time you refer to a car as a hairdresser one it's one car I would love to drive

By the way... a few weeks ago I've test driven a new MX-5 (2.0 160 bhp) and I must say it's an awesome handling car, one of the bests (if not the best) I've driven ever, try to test one before buying the MR2, it's cheaper and it may worth it

Quote from Mustafur :

and who is likeable?

Scarlett Johansson

Actually I had no idea how it works, just discovered the extension a few days ago and I remembered it reading this topic... I posted for if you find it useful for your purposes

Quote from xaotik :

Or on-track creepiness.

Just give him time

http://www.piclens.com/lite/

Quote from NSX_FReeDoM :

i have a question for the anti-hamilton people, why do you guys hate Hamilton? im just curious

I don't hate him... I mean... I don't even know him

But I must say I don't like daddylton behaviour on pits claiming for attention and acting like he was someone on the competition
I don't like the Hamilton fans that blame anyone who has a racing incident with him, but you know... blind fans exists everywhere and in every sports so... really don't care about them... most of the times they're just causing a few lol's

I'm really waiting to see a good fight between Hamilton and Kubika, they're very competitive one against the other and I'm sure they can give an awesome fight!

I think Hamilton it's not very good racing under pression

First mistake with the anti-stall system was just a n00b error, second one impacting Alonso from the rear... waiting for the telemetry but I think Hamilton may be careful on the gas when racing close
Next one trying to take turns at that speed with no front wing it's something I can't understand

Anyway... I'd love Kubika winning the race... I hope we'll see it later

Quote from Crashgate3 :

It's a limit of the hardware achitecture, not the OS running on it. A 32-bit system will *never* be able to address the full 4GB.

I'm guessing the total it can address is exactly 4GB, powers of two and all that, but that includes things like graphics RAM which takes the amount of addressable system RAM down. The more memory your graphics card has, the less system ram it can see.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension

You can activate it on Windows Vista 32 so it's possible to have (and windows detecting it) more than 4GB both Vista 32 and 64

http://www.thegeeksweek.com/bl ... 32-bit-windows-vista.html

Quote from Kajojek(PL) :

Do you guys also have this illusion that when you listen to yourself speak/sing your sound seems distorted? I can't watch videos where there is my voice because it sounds so awful. However all the people around me say it's normal. I asked my friends they have the same feeling so I'm guessing everyone has this problem. Can anyone explain why this is happening?

Just record you saying a few phrases or singing a song, post it here and we could tell you if your voice sounds stupid or not

Quote from HVS5b :

Ach, come on

I know it's all a bit of fun, but no need to spill the entire tin of beans

I've got about 8.5M credits in th bank just now, not sure whether to spend a little now or hope for some good results so I can get shot of that Force India chassis.

Decisions descisions

With the money earned with bonus question (already solved) I have 11M... no doubt for me discarding the Force India engines. I'm moving to Toro Rosso now... but I must think a bit about my Main driver

Quote from tristancliffe :

Not seen the mythbusters thing. Linkage?

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=YORCk1BN7QY

And yup, I think I've understand it now
I was thinking of conveyor matching the speed of the wheels instead the speed of the plane

Quote from tristancliffe :

No, the plane moves completely as normal relative to the observer, the control tower, and the Earth, but moves twice as fast relative to the conveyer belt

Hmmm... maybe I'm misunderstoonding something

If the conveyor matches the plane speed but in opposite direction the plane would remain stationary for an external observer. Of course the engines push the plane cause of the air that they move, not by delivering power to the wheels, but so long the wheels are in contact with the conveyor the plane will not move forward if both (the wheels and the conveyor) have the same speed in opposite directions. So if there are not forward movement there will not be air flow to lift on the wings .

If the plane moves forward (for an external observer, as you can see in the mythbusters video) then it must be one of those:
1.- The wheels have more speed than the conveyor
2.- The wheels are spinning or sliding over the conveyor

Quote from spurri :

This conveyer has a control system that tracks the planes speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction).

Quote from Jakg :

A car wouldn't move as it puts the force to the ground via wheels - a plane WOULD move as the engine exerts force on the air, not the ground.

So I understand the plane should be stationary for an external observer