Hamilton! ... oh wait, that's not right is it...
Force India stands out. But the parity among all the teams is quite nice this year.
Force India stands out. But the parity among all the teams is quite nice this year.
A Bentley too right? during testing?
Larry Gunselman is a dumbass, and needs to be shot.
The caution was out for 8 seconds, which in NASCAR FREEZES the FIELD.
Gunselman continues at FULL SPEED, and breaks Franchitti's ankle.
F'ing idiot.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v= ... PNCbA&feature=related
The caution was out for 8 seconds, which in NASCAR FREEZES the FIELD.
Gunselman continues at FULL SPEED, and breaks Franchitti's ankle.
F'ing idiot.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v= ... PNCbA&feature=related
Historic cars (of all types) have been suggested quite a bit.
It would be fantastic though wouldn't it?
Welcome to the forum BTW.
It would be fantastic though wouldn't it?
Welcome to the forum BTW.
Almost like Schumacher at Silverstone in.... 98? Broke his leg in that one.
Nasty... Let's all hope for Hekki...
This car looks very very "kit-car" from some of the angles. The interior looks a complete afterthought.
It's similar to the quality, cheap, fast idea. You can only have 2 of the 3.
Road Car, Race Car, Kit Car (unfinished). You can only have two of the 3. This looks like a kit race car.
It's similar to the quality, cheap, fast idea. You can only have 2 of the 3.
Road Car, Race Car, Kit Car (unfinished). You can only have two of the 3. This looks like a kit race car.
Anything special to differientiate this from the other dozen or so wannabe super-car makers?
Big engine, decently low weight, MR layout, it's all a bit cookie-cutter. Kudos for not making it 18 bigillion HP as standard though.
Big engine, decently low weight, MR layout, it's all a bit cookie-cutter. Kudos for not making it 18 bigillion HP as standard though.
Why you have a conceivable point in there, it's largely lost in your fanaticism and poor grammar.
As for the last part, it's similar to your loose perhaps misconstrued translation of Senna's quote. You're definition of "Drive" is someone out there who races. This is fine, but it is completely devoid of the requirement of skill, which is part of the "drive" the V1 folks are looking for, by employing LFS as a tool.
As for the last part, it's similar to your loose perhaps misconstrued translation of Senna's quote. You're definition of "Drive" is someone out there who races. This is fine, but it is completely devoid of the requirement of skill, which is part of the "drive" the V1 folks are looking for, by employing LFS as a tool.
nice! I sat with my e6750 at 8x400 for quite a while. The quads need more northbridge voltage as the FSB gets higher afaik. Grats on the nice OC, and great rig.What i'm most interested in is what LFS lacks currently. If it doesn't have changing track conditions (oil, water and dirt), weather, broken bumpers and radiators, dynamic time and temperatures, it can't possibly justify the continuing fees imo.
iRacing would have to be Shockingly good to even make me think about subscribing.
Sound is nice, but the content has to be deep, really deep, to justify the price.
iRacing would have to be Shockingly good to even make me think about subscribing.
Sound is nice, but the content has to be deep, really deep, to justify the price.
^Note: Nehalem will be a rather large "upgrade", as it ushers in a new socket (read: new motherboard) and DDR3 only (iirc).
Should be fantastic though.
I believe there needs to be a rather in-depth look at the potential short-comings of a bottom side impact.
F1 cars (and most open wheel vehicles) are more susceptible towards becoming airborne than their fendered brotheren. The bottom of these cars are largely devoid of any "crush" structures, and the driver sits right on the ground.
Replay the in-car of the Kubica crash. The nose of the car returned downward just before the head-on wall impact, resulting in almost "the ideal" crash. IF the nose of the car had still been in the air, the car would have impacted the bottom of the BMW, and almost all the force would have bypassed the crush zones. It would have easily resulted in massive forces acting on the back and spine of Kubica.
Tracks also need to be improved. The standard Catch-Fence common to NASCAR and now most tracks does work well at keeping flying cars out of the stands. Unfortunately, it also can act like a cheese-grater to open wheel cars. Also, they are still susceptible to flying wheels and tires. (see Villenueve's '01 Australia crash that claimed the life of a track worker, or 96(?) Charlotte IRL crash).
Are current racing cars phenomenally safe? Yes, but there is more to do and the efforts and pace of improving the safety of the cars need to never be lowered.
F1 cars (and most open wheel vehicles) are more susceptible towards becoming airborne than their fendered brotheren. The bottom of these cars are largely devoid of any "crush" structures, and the driver sits right on the ground.
Replay the in-car of the Kubica crash. The nose of the car returned downward just before the head-on wall impact, resulting in almost "the ideal" crash. IF the nose of the car had still been in the air, the car would have impacted the bottom of the BMW, and almost all the force would have bypassed the crush zones. It would have easily resulted in massive forces acting on the back and spine of Kubica.
Tracks also need to be improved. The standard Catch-Fence common to NASCAR and now most tracks does work well at keeping flying cars out of the stands. Unfortunately, it also can act like a cheese-grater to open wheel cars. Also, they are still susceptible to flying wheels and tires. (see Villenueve's '01 Australia crash that claimed the life of a track worker, or 96(?) Charlotte IRL crash).
Are current racing cars phenomenally safe? Yes, but there is more to do and the efforts and pace of improving the safety of the cars need to never be lowered.
Hey Shot,
Can you recommend a 24" lcd, or somewhere that list what panel = what brand?
Like AJP, I'm in the market for something new, and wondering what the better LCD's are.
Telemetry said he went from over 165mph to Stopped (forwards anyways) in just over a foot.
True testement to the SAFER barriers and the COT.
Plus when you look at it, the car kept moving around the track after the collision, which means less energy absorbed directly by the driver. (i.e. another part of what went wrong with the Earnhardt wreck)
True testement to the SAFER barriers and the COT.
Plus when you look at it, the car kept moving around the track after the collision, which means less energy absorbed directly by the driver. (i.e. another part of what went wrong with the Earnhardt wreck)
Fantastic! That really is phenomenal.
Dare I ask... Projections till the next zero???
Dare I ask... Projections till the next zero???
I see more carbon fibre shreads and tears after T1 tomorrow. Its going to be a LFS start, with the LFS car in the lead (to begin with anyway).
lol... yeah, he was in charge of looking down track, and none of his buddies decided to grab him...
Kubica On Pole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
Congratulations!!!
(kitty does Not seem pleased)
(kitty does Not seem pleased
)Very nice setup! Best of luck with it, and keep us posted with the results!
OT:
1) Speed over timings, Intels apparently love speed, so I'm guessing 5:4
2) Voltage and Temps, 45nm duals have become voltage limited, not temperature limited. Keep your voltage under 1.36 and your temps under 70C at load for a long healthy CPU life.
FYI: It sounds like you've heard of the FSB limitations on quads, 460ish for max 24/7. This is as the quad puts substantially more load on the northbridge (IIRC). While substantiated under 65nm C2D's, you're an early adopter to 45nm quad warfare, so let us know what you find.
OT:
1) Speed over timings, Intels apparently love speed, so I'm guessing 5:4
2) Voltage and Temps, 45nm duals have become voltage limited, not temperature limited. Keep your voltage under 1.36 and your temps under 70C at load for a long healthy CPU life.
FYI: It sounds like you've heard of the FSB limitations on quads, 460ish for max 24/7. This is as the quad puts substantially more load on the northbridge (IIRC). While substantiated under 65nm C2D's, you're an early adopter to 45nm quad warfare, so let us know what you find.
Last edited by srdsprinter, .
Fantastic post. Couldn't agree more actually
Well, if you've been to college, moving in and out of dorms and apartments, moving in every fall, out every summer for four or so years + any extended winter holidays, 110lbs can be much more annoying than 15lbs.
Also some classes actually had work that needed pen and paper, and thus desk-space not occupied by 110lb crt's.
Sorry we don't all get off wallowing in awe of a uniform-gradient background.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG