Quote from niels1 :

RSR XSCC skins for season 2009.

Epic skins by an epic skinner Awesome job mate!

Quote from CRC Snightlo :

Here is my SKin for the XSCC its made by my Teammate Kiste

http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/5012/xrtronnykopie.jpg

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/1218/xrtskin.jpg

You need to put your number on the roof as well

Quote from Shadowww :

Cruisers aren't race, so it's not racism.

just stop...

Quote :

The XSCC is an XRT-only series

^

great idea!

Quote from S14 DRIFT :

Stfu.

Grow up you muppet. Better yet, welcome to my ignore list. Should have put you on it ages ago.

Last edited by teedot, Tue 19 May 2009, 05:13.

/facepalm ........

Quote from dawesdust_12 :

I stand by my prior statement.

Go buy a Mac, they are the bestest at everything.

Yeah pay 1300 bucks for a completely non-upgradeable boat anchor with the same internal specs as a $399 budget system from BestBuy. Only a retard would do that.
The only thing that is worth any money in those one-piece hunks of junk they try and pawn off as some miracle of computing would be the LCD screen in the 24" iMacs...

here's a hilarious quote from their website:

Quote :

8GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x4GB - add $1,100.00!

I seriously hope thats a friggin typo! Yeah.... buy Mac... they're the bestest at RIPPING YOU OFF! Hence why I said anyone who buys one or falls for their stupid marketing is nothing short of retarded. FFS you can install OSX onto x86 hardware with Intel 965P chipsets anyways, so why even bother buying a Mac anymore?

Last edited by teedot, Mon 18 May 2009, 08:03.

Quote from bunder9999 :

if the server name contained even a single whitespace, it would have kept the original layout and linewrapped the server name.

at least it doesnt affect the other post layouts that dont have the stupid server name. I've seen similar things happen on other forums (not VB) where people have abused the "location" or "from" field in their profile and causing the same kind of issue.. only problem was it affected ALL the posts underneath it.... im sure you can imagine how much of a pain that can be, especially if that word is half the length of the friggin screen

Quote from DragonCommando :

Everyone is all like "Ubuntu is user friendly! its linux that's easy to use!"
...
the first time (and last) I installed Ubuntu on my computer was an absolute nightmare.
...
I haven't used anything but Windows for a long time now, so it could be different

It could be different? If you don't know, then why post a completely uninformed opinion? -- it most certainly is quite different since what you are describing sounds a lot like RedHat 5 thru 9. Albeit around the time 9 came out package managers were becoming more and more the norm and were beginning to be included in the distros base install package... The package manager is a program/utility that you use to install a program.... their names differ depending on what flavour of linux you use but it's usually either apt, yum or yast2 . It searches the various mirrors on the net for the fastest one near you, looks for the file you want to install, the looks for what that file needs in order to install and run, then grabs it all for you and installs it in one shot. It's as easy as typing:

-- yum install apache (on a redhat distro)

-- apt-get install firefox (on a debian distro)

-- yast2 -i apache2 (on a suse/opensuse distro)

and *poof* ... off it goes, searches for the file, then its dependencies and gets them all and installs. It's even all available thru a pretty GUI now. Heck you dont even have to tell it if you have a 32bit or 64bit OS, it will figure ALL that out for you. If only Windows was just as easy!

I really do pity the "Windows generation" sometimes.... If only you guys grew up with real computers.... not computers with pretty little "skins" ontop of the real OS... heck i remember when something like this was like seeing windows vista for the first time and going WOW



Big ol' dual 5.25" floppy drives, one disk (360KB in size) containing the OS and another disk containing your files... no hard drives.... 640KB of ram, 128K video memory.... 1200bps modem or a 2400bps if u were rich (imagine downloading something at 0.15KB/s or 0.29KB/s ... ROFL )
Oh and if you were a real power user, you could upgrade to 1MB of RAM.... if you had a spare line of credit.

Last edited by teedot, Mon 18 May 2009, 07:36.

Quote from dawesdust_12 :

For you knowledge level:


Go buy a Mac, so then you can't fill them with viruses and spyware.

..............

==========================================

@ OP: If you haven't used Linux before, like many others have said, it can be a bit daunting at first... Ubuntu happens to be one of the more user-friendly versions where most things can be done thru the GUI/Desktop rather then the command line. Linux is very powerful and once you figure out the "inner workings" and how to use the command line you will soon see that its not really all that much at all.

Most "flavours" of Linux will run quite a few Windows games thru 3rd party addons, namely Wine and Cedega. But be aware it WILL NOT RUN EVERYTHING -- So if you see a nice shiny box for Crysis on a store's shelf and have hopes to play that on Linux, not gonna happen.

Looking at it from a non-gaming perspective -- OpenOffice runs on Linux (and comes with Ubuntu if i'm not mistaken..) which is completely interoperable with Microsoft Office (Opens & Saves to/from MS Office file formats), Firefox works fine, VMWare & Sun VirtualBox run fine (im sure you'd have no need to run something like this... but meh)... and theres a whole whackload of stuff im not even going to bother putting down here... but im sure you can see where im going with this.

So.... If you enjoy a bit of challenge and want to have a stable and secure system, I'd reccomend going with Ubuntu (FYI, Kubuntu i find works better for beginners... it's desktop operates similar to Windows so there is minimal [if any] learning curve in that respect). LFS runs OK under Linux (with some very minor issues, like poor shadows..) -- For a full list of applications tested to work on Linux while using WINE, please visit http://appdb.winehq.org/

Let us know what you choose and dont be afraid to ask any questions

Last edited by teedot, Mon 18 May 2009, 00:56.

Quote from Shadowww :

lolwat? Hacking is bad, you must know that. And there is no dual core Pentium IV.

You're so quick to jump to conclusions arent you?
Pentium dual cores _DO_ exist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_D

I get a trojan warning when i visit that site... why?

Quote from pigmeu :

Noticed a "bug", when i press both the left an right view buttons the view doesn't change to rear view. This is not specific to the Z13 patch but i recall this feature existing in previous releases. I really liked that feature because it freed a button on my steering wheel, it was more natural and provided a better view around the car, no one snaps his neck to rear view.
A nice "feature" would be no rear view mirror on the single seaters. But i suppose that was discussed so I'll shut up.
I also noticed that in shift+u mode the force feedback does not work. Not sure if anyone would find a use for that anyway.
No problems with path Z13 till now.
Keep up the really good work!

None of the things you speak of are bugs.

a quick search of the forums would give you the answer

/facepalm .................

Quote from biffenjohansson :

How long its take?

a long as they want, stop spamming the test patch thread.

crap.. just like the first one

Quote from Dazmyster :

been 4 months since they delayed the patch & new car and still not released .. rediculas

The only thing that is ridiculous is the amount of complete garbage posted in this thread.

Quote from Latetzki :

I'm not going to search answer to my question, it's 40 pages, if you think this asking is unnecessary, answer should be in first post.

If youre not going to make an effort to look for your own answer, then dont expect people to help you. We're not here to spoonfeed you like a baby

I remember running it on an XP1800+ w/ 512DDR and an FX5200... I managed to push about 30fps on avg out of it... albeit it was a LONG time ago ...

because you received incident points for car contact/dropping more than 2 tires off track/etc... iRacing expects you to drive perfect.

Well... i used to have a Mk2 '83 Supra about 8-9 yrs ago.. it was a slug as it only had a 5MGE... but i loved it


*Thats not MY car, but it looked pretty much identical, minus the rims.

I still wish i had it

Quote from GrIp DrIvEr :

are you guys serious? Do you still believe in the tooth fairy, too?

quite serious - pay up sucker!

blah i spoiled my own fun oh well