Maybe it would be nice to have the number of comments for every article in brackets behind the news title in the box on top of this forum? This way it'd be easier to know if it's worth clicking the link another time 
I'm not talking about unstable setups unlike what your Polish friend suggests 
I'm saying that for putting down a good laptime, you need, apart from skills, a bit of luck. Because sometimes you just can't get that laptime (after a couple of tries) which you know is possible with the setup; putting the best splittimes together tells you that a perfect lap would mean a better laptime and that all that is needed is more practise with the setup.
With the application you're suggesting, that setup wouldn't be saved, because you didn't improve your laptime. With my suggestion, that laptime would be saved because the split times are faster.
I'm saying that for putting down a good laptime, you need, apart from skills, a bit of luck. Because sometimes you just can't get that laptime (after a couple of tries) which you know is possible with the setup; putting the best splittimes together tells you that a perfect lap would mean a better laptime and that all that is needed is more practise with the setup.
With the application you're suggesting, that setup wouldn't be saved, because you didn't improve your laptime. With my suggestion, that laptime would be saved because the split times are faster.
Honestly wouldn't know who else deserved it
That's right
Sometimes your split times can be faster, but you just can't get the splits together.. that's why I think storing setups by split times is much more interesting. Also, this would give an interesting insight on setup changes and their influence on sector times.I don't have time for such a project, but I like the idea! One thing to bear in mind is that sometimes a better setup doesn't make for a better laptime. I would go one step further and save setups for the fastest splittimes.
Driver swaps not yet implemented into the embedded results Victor? Or just lazyness of the news poster in question? 
Other than that; another fantastic addon for LFS World, great work.. :bowdown:
Other than that; another fantastic addon for LFS World, great work.. :bowdown:
Agreed with above, thanks for the investigation and great work on finding a penalty that hits the person in question, rather than the team he disadvantaged (or at least as little as possible in this situation).
^ What he said. The right amount of rest is possibly even more important than the right amount of excercises. I don't know if you're new to running, but 5km every day seems quite a lot to me, if you're a beginner. I'd start off with three times a week, max.
(Edit: beaten by the runmeister himself. :razz
And one thing I think is missing in your plans is food. Make sure you take enough carbs everyday to give you the energy to keep this up, and make sure you take enough endosperms (just looked that up with babelfish; wtf? :shy
for muscle recovery.(Edit: aanndd apparently the food thing isn't new in this thread either, you might just wanna skip this post!
)Thanks, but I read that too
Would like to know which position-changes are still possible How is the points distribution per race? ie. which places in the overall standings are still subject of possible changes?
Source: http://www.indianapolismotorsp ... Of_A_Formula_One_Pit_Stop
Use that and the track length to get a fuel consumption estimate
Close call between andRo., JO53PHS and Taavi.. but Taavi get's my vote: nice 'n crisy!
I like Thunderhead's image a lot too, but at least one of the cars should have been sharp imo
I like Thunderhead's image a lot too, but at least one of the cars should have been sharp imo
Right decision to bring it out Petri, well done there.
To the man who always claimed he wasn't interested in the size of his e-penis: I hope you're proud of yourself now, c*ck.
To the man who always claimed he wasn't interested in the size of his e-penis: I hope you're proud of yourself now, c*ck.
I have the feeling this suggestion has been overlooked by the admins? I really don't see any problems with going with this approach.
Lol, nicely put
+1 for both
Alonso and Piquet to remain at Renault for 2009
Full article:
http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2008/11/8652.html
Bloody hell.. can't believe they keep crash pilot Piquet on the team
And too bad Alonso stays at Renault, would have loved to see him in a Ferrari
Yeah.. but unlucky for you, you will only see my rear.. on the starting grid...
disclaimer for future reference: yes. i'm kidding.
Very nice report on the LFS World Series! Great job Michael!
I think you're asolutely right Marco.
Unless something bad happens, the driver right in front of you on the grid (in positions) should be your target, no matter how big a gap he leaves to the car in front.I've discussed this with André and found the reason for this problem here. I was going to make vids and screenshots and etc. but luckily the screenshot in Josh' post already explains what's going on. As you can see, according to LFS, André's position is 5th at the moment the screenshot was taken. Now looking at where he is in the pack, his position should obviously be 3rd. Unfortunately André used the big figure in the top right of his screen to orientate, and you can see from the replay that LFS calculates his position as 5th/4th from the beginning of the straight, until the finish line.
We've taken note of this and will make sure to prevent this from happening next time around, by using only windows and mirrors to navigate to our position.
After experiencing almost half an hour of one of the best and fair fights I've ever seen in LFS, I have to say it's such a pity to see this.
Especially when it's actually you who's handing out the first bump just a second before the push you refer too. We never even thought to complain about that though, because it was completely in line with the great battle and in our opinion all fair.Yes it was unlucky that you touched the wall there, but on behalf of Vince I can assure you it definitely wasn't on purpose.
Something to do with compression.. should be no problem for LFS
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG