That's an assumption many people have but I see no reason for that. Diesel engines have changed, we're not living in the 90s anymore...
Haha, I like how he just put the lower bumper section over the FZ5, I can still see the shapes that totally cross lines with the FZ5 bumper. Also he didn't bother adjusting colour balance.
... or just enter Germany.
I'm not too happy with the lights but other than that it turned out very well!
Oh and there's some rain missing in the background.
Oh and there's some rain missing in the background.
The XFG one looks nice in terms of colour and contrast (as usual with you) but the motion blur is going in different directions but in a very weird way, that looks too unnatural.
The XRG one has a nice atmosphere and I like your use of classic race car skins. I have to criticise though, there's motion blur missing on the left side and the ground. The DOF blur on the asphalt looks very neat!
Also I guess you wouldn't be able to see much through the side windows of the car (sky reflection far brighter).
That FOX one is very weak (as by your standards). You've done the usual rain edit mistakes like most of those, who've tried. Surely, you can do better than this.
The XRG one has a nice atmosphere and I like your use of classic race car skins. I have to criticise though, there's motion blur missing on the left side and the ground. The DOF blur on the asphalt looks very neat!
Also I guess you wouldn't be able to see much through the side windows of the car (sky reflection far brighter).
That FOX one is very weak (as by your standards). You've done the usual rain edit mistakes like most of those, who've tried. Surely, you can do better than this.
Seeing your avatar: Do you finally regret you sold it? Poor thing 
How's it doing now?
How's it doing now?It's square for me :0
Edit: And it's always been that way as far as I remember
Edit: And it's always been that way as far as I remember
Last edited by 5tag, .
Damn dude, that is one nice collection of cars, besides that yellow one.
I love the changed frontends of some european mass produces cars that were sold in the states.
Also, what's that silver coupe in the background? Looks like a Type 14 Ghia but where are the B-pillars and is that windscreen missing too?
You're an idiot if you think this is cool, but we knew that long before anyways. The guy from the video is a very good driver, nice car control... I hope he gets seriously injured before he kills someone.
Are you kidding? Taavi has been around for years. His work was of very high, steady quality ever since I can remember him posting edits.
I like where this thread is going in the last couple of weeks.
Although I'm not a fan of zenkiukas' LFS-car-in-real-photo jobs.
Although I'm not a fan of zenkiukas' LFS-car-in-real-photo jobs.
I think it's not really the fuel consumption that'll make your wallet bleed.
Don't know what you picture has to do with your question or with answering my question, but if you may have a look at THIS IMAGE I think you'll see that in comparison to an actual Camaro the race car you posted has some pretty weird proportions so my question was what kind of chassis and engine is hidden underneath the Camaro shaped body cover.
That's a really short wheelbase. What's underneath all the plastic?
Hadn't noticed that before but I thought it was much more obvious that the rear end is totally messed up there. Also the whole car is pretty dark for such a bright surrounding.
One's got to love your editing style, subtle but very atmospheric. Those wheels are great too!
It says 25V on there. May I ask what kind of motorcycle you own?
A proper edit is not an easy 10 minute job.
The blur makes no sense, to be honest. As I see it the camera is
supposed to be focused on a far distance like the bridge or trees.
That makes the close things appear blurred.
Now if you look at your picture again, there's stuff in the distance
which is also heavily blurred (like the outside right and upper left
and everything seen in the mirrors [not the mirrors itself] ) and
there's close stuff that isn't (like your windscreen wipers).
If' you're just being ignorant please don't waste your time posting anywhere.
How many of those "self-satisfied-impotent" drivers have you met so far? And by the way if you think dropping a euro car plus fitting in some classic alloy wheels (don't know where you saw spinners...) makes proper rice then you have no clue of what that even means.
That Evo 2 is also a matter of taste. The wing, wheel arches and bumpers/side skirts don't match the original boxy design of the 190. Looks kind of works-riced.
Not doubting its performance but with this being a thread about sexy cars I'd much prefer the Evo 1. No matter which one but I think they both look better in race trim.Oh and sorry about those 22" ricer-wheels and the cardboard front splitter.
What in the name of Eric Bailey have you done to the B-pillar?
@ e2mustang:
Isn't that how spanish speaking people type "hahahahaha" in chat?
Isn't that how spanish speaking people type "hahahahaha" in chat?
Black... they are usually referred to as "black people". I know, what an utterly hard thing to remember!
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG