Racing teams can never have too much money. The money they now have 'free' can be used for other things (unless they already knew about this deal when they were budgeting for this year so the 'extra' money has already been spent).
My actual home screen is quite basic...I keep most things on other screens. First and last screens aren't used, second contains messages, third contains Internet stuff (Market, Browser, GMail, Navigation etc), fifth contains a few apps and sixth contains twitter feed (which I don't use that much). I've edited the shots to remove location and SMS info. Phone is an HTC Desire.
Does the case have a speaker? If so, is it connected properly to the motherboard (looking at an image of the board the speaker header is located just beside the SATA1 port)?
Ah, those kind of points. Why didn't you say? I thought you meant F1 world championship points...you know, the ones you get for finishing races in points-paying positions. The ones which he scored hardly any of last year. So, I can't see your evidence for saying he is a "definite points finish kind of guy". On the evidence we have he really isn't. Your gut isn't evidence and it doesn't award points.
OK, so you want people to remember 10 different passwords like your example above? Didn't you just say the average user wouldn't use a 16 character password and now you want them to remember 10 passwords which aren't that easy to remember? Where's the upside in that compared to a single password like you could use for a password manager? With the password manager approach you make the user remember 1 password (and make sure they make it relatively complex) and that gets them access to all their other passwords (each of which is more secure than the ones you'd have them remember).
ePenis doesn't come into it...it's all about practical security. 128 bit is only 'enough' if you can't use 256 bit for some reason.
Ah, but you're totally missing the point. If you use a password manager you can use pseudo-randomly generated (read: very strong) passwords for all your accounts. If you're just remembering all your passwords you end up making them simple enough that you can recall them quickly. That's the major difference. In your scenario above Bob ends up with passwords like "bob", "bob1234", "bobby", "bobbob". In the password manager scenario Bob ends up with passwords like "coiicbdcr974itn?c8h43", "fv0i9b09uy5pgnrpivh ;" and a master password that should be more difficult to brute force than "bob", "bob1234" etc.
I disagree. Your 'advice' (which seems to be that you should just use a a slightly leet-ised word?) is massively uninformed.
The average home user now has a massive amount of processing power available to them. Even on a 10 year old CPU the task of encrypting and decrypting a few hundred characters is nothing. For a very, very slight increase in encryption/decryption time you get a massive amount more security. Why would you advise someone to use a weaker form of security if the upside was barely noticeable? Sounds like bad advice to me...
It doesn't matter how I look. What matters is the quality of what I'm actually saying. The quality of what I'm actually saying (i.e. my advice on security) is far better than yours, despite you claiming to provide security advice for companies with "very secure systems".
People are (slowly) improving their online security. I don't think it's a terrible stretch with continued education (which you claim to provide ). Anyway, you concede that in that situation brute forcing is not an option, yes?
Right...and what happens when the user chooses a non-trivial master password (as they should!)? Something relatively long (say ~16 characters, as before), containing uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers and punctuation. Now the task of brute forcing the master password has gone from something you make sound easy to something which is totally unrealistic.
I don't...just when people authoritatively say things that are either inaccurate, misleading or likely to cause problems.
OK, if you're in the mood for educating us tell us why a password manager application (built into the OS or 3rd party) is so "silly". What is your idea of a better alternative?
I'm very sorry about that (I can't apologise enough). It looks like your board is available in both varieties and I mistakenly thought it was only available in socket 478.
I've never been a fan of supercharger whine, especially not that loud. If you want a fast estate/wagon why not just go for the obvious Audi (e.g. RS6 Avant, RS4 Avant)/Mercedes (e.g. C63 AMG Estate)/BMW (e.g. M5 Touring)/Volvo (e.g. V70) offerings? If price is a concern you could get a nice used model of at least some of the above for the same price as this CTS-V and you'd probably end up with a better car.