I dont think there should be "feelings" for tracks anyway. A track is a track, its like another form and experience/way to win a race. If its not a repeated track, then its a track, and as long as it can actually be raced on (ie, no holes or sharp bumps that will rip up the car), then why should people car if it looks good or bad.
I donno, i too have track priorities. That is, i do like tracks more then others. But the way i see a track, is just a bunch of walls and corners that are required to..hmm... go around and complete. And the more variation, the better.
I think it makes a better driver shine more. The more the tracks are more alike or made for "Formula 1" the less interesting it gets, for me that is. How can i explain it, i see it like a driver being, "ok, this track is tight, fast etc etc, i need to drive it like this this this." .. next race.. "Ok, this track is wide, flowing and very fast, i need to drive smooth,fast etc etc" That Moscow track above is nothing like any track on the calender today in F1. And to me that's just a +1.
IMO.