Sorry about the misunderstanding Kev (I can call you that way, right?)
What you quoted was a reference to Medieval Total War 2 but I can be wrong there as well, I played it about a year ago.
Although I used to spent hours in campaign mod, multiplayer was the option if you really wanted a "total war". It was pretty much like a chess match, the only difference being a lot more pawns.
I believe that you are referring to the Insim applications. From what I know, you can't get the sumo application from anywhere because it was never released for public use and I have to idea of the existence of a destruction derby Insim .
Guess you'll just have to settle at visiting the respective servers
Weird, I remember the AI trying to flank me, but I believe that the game was set on hard. In normal and easy mod, it's quite easy to win even when there's a ration of 3:1 as said above.
But the AI would really need a bit more I in the AI An example of this from Rome Total War: Expedition to Egypt, I take over Alexandria, the pharaoh doesn't like it so he bring a huge army in front of Alexandria's gates. I'm left only with 6 generals and their bodyguards and 2 cohorts. Cohorts stay in Alexandria, generals go outside and attack the pharaoh and his phalanx bodyguards who are positioned quite reasonable ,for me, in front of a huge army formed by phalanx units and carriages. Pharaoh dies so the entire army, which could have still won without even breaking a sweat, runs away and a big part of it gets killed while running.
I personally loved the series and played everyone since Shogun Total War ,with the exception of Medieval Total War 1. Can't wait for it since I love the idea of having sea battles and having more effective guns.
Although I remember another 16 century Total War-like game. Played the demo but unfortunately forgot it's name so I never had the chance to buy it
Well I know that today's racing cars are extremely safe and the death percentage per year has dropped a lot although I will agree that you can still die . I understand that your average Joe won't afford an F1 team but for the price of a 401, a pair of Razor headphones, a Logitech G25, etc. added up might cost as much as competing for a year in a modest league which I believe would be more rewarding then a simulation could ever be.
That might be but judging from this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... yfbhw&feature=related) it looks that it would be a very realistic experience but since it should be more expensive then the 301, I would never be that mad to buy it....unfortunately
I myself had quite a lot of problem in the past with headphones, always braking down, starting to hear trough just one headphone, etc. but even so I personally can't wait for this to come out because I think that it must be high quality to justify the price.
...Unfortunately not for consumer use but you can get it's smaller brother, the 301, which still looks pretty interesting.
Did I mentioned it's price (301)? It costs about $15000
I'm sure that the simulator plus those headphones would make for a pretty nice experience but I still think that it's a bit exaggerated. I've never understood why some people would plan on spending that much on virtual immersion, why not just do the real thing?
Well if I would go for the looks, I would say 1999....luckily I'm not so I choose the 2009 F1 since it's a bit closer to traditional single seaters (no TC and slicks)