Coulthard changed his tune, I remember at the '05 Indianapolis GP he said he'd race even with the Michelin issue anyway and said danger is PART of F1 but these days when commentating he sounds like my dad.
Definitely not but the gmotor engine is a decent base and should not be labeled alongside Dirt IMO
Racing, F1 especially, is about pushing the limits of everything available. You can't place blame on the teams. They're just doing what they have always done, and will always do.
rFactor alone is horrible, but the physics aren't complete shite. With the right mod it can feel half decent. It's almost like ISI made it for modding, and just made the shittest series possible.
Such as GameStockCar or Fórmula Truck, runs on the gmotor engine, aside from the UI and other things, you wouldn't notice it was the gmotor engine at all.
Well when they've been doing it for years. No.
Is that TOCA2 shot at Knockhill? I can't tell. 
I very much doubt teams were putting the rear tyres on asymmetrically. Pirelli have since retracted 'blaming' the teams for that anyway. So go figure.
Well yea, have the guys in top ten locked in to having the q tyre, and those beyond with free tyre option.
You won't get a strategy if you remove two compound rule and the grid lock system as you'll just get q tyres in q and r tyres in r......
You won't get a strategy if you remove two compound rule and the grid lock system as you'll just get q tyres in q and r tyres in r......
I admired Pirelli in the beginning for knowingly making shitty tyres even though to the general idiots would give Pirelli a bad rep. They gave the sport what it was asking for.
Now though, the tyres have gotten to be a joke, and they won't take blame for it?
What they should do is just have a soft tyre that's quicker by multiple seconds a lap but only lasts a few laps. Then the hard tyre is majorly slower but lasts alot longer. There's not enough of a difference in the tyre compounds... What's the point having two different compounds if they're always within a second of each other.... doesn't make sense to me.
Now though, the tyres have gotten to be a joke, and they won't take blame for it?
What they should do is just have a soft tyre that's quicker by multiple seconds a lap but only lasts a few laps. Then the hard tyre is majorly slower but lasts alot longer. There's not enough of a difference in the tyre compounds... What's the point having two different compounds if they're always within a second of each other.... doesn't make sense to me.
Of course he beat it by a considerable margin it's Loeb.
I couldn't find a bit where it specified they were the same as F1 tyres or not, it only said the compounds used were the same..
Can't find one actually but I didn't say I knew, I just said "they don't" as a remark relating to the lolfest that was todays F1 race as if to say "they can't possibly be the same because it doesn't make sense given what has been seen today."
Maybe they could be the same tyre but due to F1's higher stress into the carcass of the tyre it was causing the failures because like I said, GP2 didn't have an issue.
Well if they did they would have had the same problems as F1.
If there is any series that will use the extreme edges of a track, and parts of a circuit that never were supposed to see a race car. It's GP2
You could just believe me because it makes sense but maybe that's too difficult.
That's the scary truth of it...
Rule #1 of a Russian accident, make sure you take as many people with you, and cause as much collateral damage as humanly possible.
This guy completely rocked Rule #1
It's clearly the construction that is an issue. The kerbs are no different from last year and they've not had this problem before and there were no related issues in GP2 or other support series.
It might be the kerb that is causing the tyre to die, but ultimately it's the weakness of the tyre that is the issue, not the kerbs.
BTW. I said Vettel would retire, really should have put money on that
It might be the kerb that is causing the tyre to die, but ultimately it's the weakness of the tyre that is the issue, not the kerbs.
BTW. I said Vettel would retire, really should have put money on that
FFS why does this shit always happen to Engstler...
The problem isn't the event, or the majority. It's around 5 or so people that cause wrecks in every 500 they attend.
Jesus arcwelding Christ. Nice headset.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG