The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(984 results)
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from Bmxtwins :It was the number he wore when he died you ****ing idiot. It would be a more of a rememberance of him.

A remembrance is remembering the good and success of a person, not the death...
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :His number at Williams in '94 was 2.

Well in that number nothing good came, so I don't see why someone would choose that number to show support for such a Driver. Also in terms of success that car number yielded nothing for Senna.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from tristancliffe :

#2 is a fairly good number for a Senna fan.

Why? He's known only for driving the number #1 the #27 and I think it was either #12 or #14. Can't remember exactly though.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from sinbad :"Achievements"? Really?
No thanks, I don't need a little icon popping up as some kind of reward for doing something that I wouldn't otherwise choose to do.

There's plenty to keep me entertained in AC, but some sort of quest for these little slogans is not one of them, and this reminds me of the daft way people who think that to complain about lack of new LFS content you need to have done laps with every single combo, as if filling up the LFSworld grids is some kind of achievement.

Achievements based on beating a lap time are far more of a reflection of ability than an achievement saying you completed a time trial with no damage though.

To a point the achievements just act like stats, for now at least. Just like LFSWORLD
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from GreyBull [CHA] :At almost every single online simracing series, we have the same old story, no matter the title, no matter the adminning team, no matter the drivers: attendance is good the first few rounds, then it drops significantly around halfway.

It's very frustrating for drivers and admins alike, makes the racing tedious quite quickly, and makes championships look quite irrelevant.

So what about keeping things as short as possible? Maybe something like 3, 4 rounds championships. Or maybe even more single events(the 2H race format has always worked well over the years).

As they say in show-business, always leave them wanting more...

The fact is, you get people who are dedicated and then you get those that have a bad result or realise they're not as quick as they thought and give up very easily.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from Bean0 :I know we talked a little while ago about NDR running a new UFRC Baby-R thing, it always got a lot of interest so could be another option.

Never understood the baby-r. It feels so slow to drive and the only cars its faster than is the UF1, XFG and XRG iirc. Just not challenging enough IMO
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
f1 could be fun
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from R3DMAN :Looks great, sounds good too!

It does sound good but it's the audio from another car.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from IMOL :Now... This is pretty much conversation about Race

Actually?
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :Ah, so you're not content with redefining maths, you want to do the same to the English language? I see...all your posts make sense now.

Don't kick a man whilst he's under the influence of retard!
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :...

Where did I say that I didn't believe it? I just said it wasn't really possible which in my retarded syntax means 'difficult'.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
I would of suggesting scrapping LFSCART as it doesn't attract decent enough numbers.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :





Do you still refuse to believe that some people know the Nordschleife corner-by-corner in-sequence from memory, though? That's the annoying claim which you made, and I hope you've come to reconsider it.

I have never refused to believe it. I said if you took pictures and asked someone to order them it would be a struggle to do it and they probably wouldn't get it correct. It's like remembering a street name or something, you might not remember what it's called but you know the location and all but you just don't remember the name. That's why I said I severely doubt anyone could accurately run through the Nordschleife on the fly. It's one of those things.

If someone was to do it to me in person I wouldn't be able to credit or dis-credit them because I don't have the knowledge of the Nordschleife to contest that and I think when people refer to 'this guy knows the Nordschleife inside out' that it is one of these incidents, where they reel off a few corners that may or may not be in the correct order, but it sounds correct so people just assume it's correct.

I suppose though maybe I am generalizing and using sim-racers/car enthusiasts as the benchmark in that typically every body thinks they know more than they actually do. Myself included.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from dawesdust_12 :That is literally exactly what I said.

Is it? Actually?
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :For the memorable (or oft-mentioned) corners (such as 'turn 8' at Turkey, 'Eau Rouge' at Spa, 'The Corkscrew' at Laguna Seca, 'Skyline' at Bathurst, 'Karussell' at the Nordschleife etc) most of this forum's members would be able to picture them in their minds immediately, without having to visualise the preceding corners or any of the rest of the lap. That's for 'untrained' enthusiasts, not people who make their living from driving. Do you really think it's that difficult for racing drivers to visualise corners in isolation?





Any proof?

The difference is you're mentioning ICONIC turns. The landmarks of those particular tracks. If you mention a relatively minor corner or a corner not alot of people pay attention to such as Stavelot at Spa or Cascades at Oulton or Craner Curves at Donington. But if you gave the corner numbers before the name it's alot harder to visulize depending on what system you're used to of course. [numbers as opposed to corner names]

Also in relation to the last paragraph you wrote. It's impossible to 'prove' that unless an experiment was done. Say, take Marc Basseng as an example or someone like that with extensive knowledge and then get someone else with little or no knowledge to do as many laps as the pro driver has done [approximately] and then do various memory tests about the circuit to each of the people and see how results compare. Although I'd say it would be pretty impossible to rack up as many miles at the ring as some of these VLN drivers because they've been driving there all their lives.


But lets not stray off topic here, my original point was you may not know the track inside out but it doesn't stop you from knowing what corners/sections DO come next. Personally there's too many versions of Nordschleife. GT's epic version, Forzas weird version and rFactors shit version for someone here to say they know it inside out anyway..
Last edited by BlueFlame, .
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Steve Clarke getting canned was silly though... he was doing a good job..
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
No, I think GTR should be a series. What's the point having only single races that your main competitors might not even be able to attend?

It's so much more fun when there's a championship involved because points make races more interesting. If there's something that's only a single event, I know personally I wouldn't bother entering, because nobody has a reputation or respect to care about anyone else.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from dawesdust_12 :You're typing into a text field. That sounds like the same process that one would take to write a paper in Word. How is it so different?

There's less effort involved in typing than writing. You could even remove and replace a word with less effort than it takes to actually write an actual word on an actual piece of paper with actual ink n shizzle.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
If I screamed a random corner number at a random track you think anybody would just instantly know what it was? Of course they wouldn't. They'd have to play out a few corners in their mind before getting close and even then they have a great chance of being wrong.

There are probably very few techniques where visualizing will a whole lap would help. Nobody is going to simulate [real-time] mentally driving the Nordschleife or Le Sarthe back-straights for instance. They're just focusing on the important aspects, braking points, turn in, peripheral references.

This Loci method only seems to be applicable to those who are gifted with an insanely large and accessible memory bank. But before now I hadn't read anything about that.

You're right in terms of having pictures vs visualizing in your mind though. I guess it was a bad example. But I think sports people get too much benefit of the doubt in that respect in that they know every aspect of teh track they're racing on and every little camber change and tiny bump. The reality is they probably remember the track just as anyone else would with the same amount of experience on that said track. Just cos they can drive a car fast as hell doesn't make them a superhuman brain too. I mean, look at Maldonado...
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from amp88 :Are you serious? You're saying that even professional racing drivers and development drivers who have done literally thousands or tens of thousands of laps there don't remember exactly what's coming next? Also, if you think remembering a race track is impossible for the human brain then you really need to take a look at some serious feats of memory recall.

If you read. You'll notice that I said when you're ON the track you'll know whats coming next but it's almost impossible without proper mental training to recall from your memory alone all 140~ corners because it's theoretically impossible to process 140 images in your mind successively.

If you had a picture of each corner of the Nordschleife and were asked to put them all in order I bet even professionals would get a few corners wrong. It's just the way the human brain works.

Just like if you visualize in your mind a trip to the shops. Guaranteed you will miss things out from the images in your head, be it something small like a shop window or lamp post or something a bit more significant like the length of the road or the width of it.

Much like trying to draw a track map from memory on a piece of paper, you'll probably draw something completely shite, but it doesn't mean that you don't know the track like the back of your hand.

It's along the lines of when you smell/hear or taste something that reminds you of something else but it's never triggered by anything other than that specific sensory input. It's exactly the same when talking about the Nordschleife. It's the images of what you see there and further down the road that trigger your memory to tell you what is next. A still image is probably not enough information to tell you what is next as your eyes have memorized the 3d images of the track rather than 2d ones. And unlike a shorter track there are too many short term elements to stack in your mental RAM [so to speak].
Last edited by BlueFlame, .
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from dawesdust_12 :How does anyone not know the nurburgring off by heart by now?

Well to an extent that's true but if you honestly picture the nordschleife and do a lap in your head I garentee you'll miss a few corners out.

That's teh beauty of the Nordschleife. You do know the track, when on track you know whats coming next, but you couldn't possibly remember all 140~ corners by memory in the correct order. It's just not really possible for the human brain to do it.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from PMD9409 :For a new sim outside of LFS, I'd jump on AC instantly the second online becomes available. Better to get things established quickly so you have a large base right off the bat. Obviously if the netcode is 1995 level then reevaluate after.

For your premier series, GTWS and LFSCART should be all you need. Each quarter of the year you can have a different series pop in like TBOC, STDC, LXC, SSC (Single seaters idk). Also once each quarter, at least one 'event' needs to be ran. This could be a large endurance race when GTWS is in hibernation mode. It can also be something off the wall like Autocross or Rallycross. Point is, don't get repetitive. KY250 and 500 are two big events for you right there which never change, and they should be the only ones that do not change.

For KY250 and 500, just make an insim which tracks how many times a person has "Major Damage Repair". They should only be able to do it two times, the third time it should exclude them from the race.

This.
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from dekojester :so! 1) what hardware do i need to run ac reasonably well?

2) who from here wants me to run events in ac as soon as multiplayer becomes available?

2 = +11111
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Quote from R3DMAN :gt2 @ imola

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v ... rOns&feature=youtu.be

Actually a rather smooth lap. Like watching Jenson Button
BlueFlame
S3 licensed
Well what grinds my gears (no pun intended) is drivers with little experience who do no practice, drivers/teams that make alot of mistakes during a race and seem to do nothing to solve the problem and keep making those mistakes in every race.

I mean sure I think LLM are taking an unfair beating, like I said to Sean on TS the other night. In some way no matter how people see LLM the fact of the matter is in some way, without LLM it wouldn't be quite the same.

Although it does seem to be a fact that every race there is a major incident involving an LLM car and it's not uncommon at all to see an LLM vehicle on it's lid during an event. That's what annoys me because it doesn't seem to get rectified because it seems to happen all the time.

In some way I do have respect for LLM because no matter what they keep racing and to be fair that should be commended because after bad results alot of people lose motivation and give up completely.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG