Quote from ImudilaSkyline :

but if it's so easy for you then it shouldn't take too much effort from you, should it?

I feel taking a piss is easy, doesn't make me a world champion at it though does it?

Quote from ImudilaSkyline :

why don't you own all of the WR's except FZ1's then?

Because I'm not good enough or dedicated enough for ultimate 1 lap pace.



I won't drive any other GTR car. That's just who I am and my style.

I can set WR splits here and there but hotlapping doesn't appeal to me. I just know I'm faster in an XR than I am in FZ.

But I don't care that others are faster than me driving their XR's, I have fun in my FZ with it's superior traction and braking.

Quote from Mustangman759 :

Because he would get lapped too many times

Look at my average lap from the last round. bear in mind there was a lengthy safety car period. Yea. Then sit down and shut up.

Quote from CSF :

Why don't you try Gt2 then?

Because I want to battle the fastest drivers in the fastest cars.

To me GT2, just like driving XRR it's just like ezmode. Sure enough I respect anyones taste to drive whatever they want, but to me everything else other than GT1 FZR is just too easy to drive.

Lets not go off topic though which I'm guilty of more than anyone. The fact remains that theres two teams in GT2 with 3 cars and not even two cars for one team in GT1.

Last edited by BlueFlame, Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:49.

Quote from vipex123 :

Sure, no worries, we'll pull two of our cars and along with LLM halve the GT2 grid size.

Well like I said. There's FACT. 3 cars for at least two teams in GT2. You can get butthurt about my open minded suggestion if you wish but you can't ignore facts.



Although on a side note GT1 is, or was [before IMOL was banned] at least, more competitive in-terms of outright speed with the aliens involved in GT1.

GT2 [to me] just seems like an easy option for some who didn't want to battle IMOL and Dennis.

:twocents:

Quote from CodeLyoko1 :

that will just make the gt2 field smaller, but will not make the gt1 field bigger. Since our gt2 cars have drivers who can't drive gt1. They are all not experienced enough for gt1, and unlike some gt1 cars, we start off in gt2 to build up experience.

Well it's not directed at LLM specifically but the fact is theres at least 2 teams there fielding 3 GT2 cars.

Wow that Hornet is really concours material, well except the engine bay..

The F40... It's just shit. Turbo lag, shitty gear ratio and basically 0 chassis stability. Brakes are shite and unless you're bogged down off boost you just can't keep the thing in a straight line off the corners.

The fact that /drive video shows CH not being able to keep the F40 in a straight line sums up how bad the chassis is. People just feel the power of the twin turbo unit and see a Ferrari badge on the car and just automatically believe it must be the most amazing car ever made.

Either cap GT2 or limit the amount of cars in GT2 that a team can have, I mean LLM, Vires and WCL to mind all have 3 GT2 entries.

Quote from Boris Lozac :

Give me the most sattisfying combo you've found so far..

Anything around Magione.

Quote from ajp71 :

Yes there is, the orange ring on the gear display app is a boost gauge and the F40 has one on the dash as well.

That doesn't mean there is turbo modelling, it just means there is a dial that vaguely resembles turbo pressure.

Quote from JackDaMaster :

The drivers cost themselves that year; Massa at Silverstone, Hamilton at Fuji, Kimi at Spa etc. It's just that Hamilton ****ed up fewer times than the rest.

Yea but Massa at Silverstone was like watching a fat man on a slip'n'slide.

Quote from jrd.racer :

OMG the 599 sounds freking epic

That it does.... That it does. 599 for me, gives the best feeling for a car on AC with a fair bit of downforce. The Zonda and the M3 GT2 and Z4 GT3 feel on rails to me and I don't get much feeling from them. Unfortunately.

Quote from CSF :

It's pretty amusing that McLaren had a reliable car this year isn't it?

Yea coupled with the fact it was complete shite. Although they still managed to **** up their strategy and pitstops....

Quote from R3DMAN :

yea i noticed... least i cant be banned for lying.. 6 days is a bit harsh i thought lol

anyway, i created a new username and relogged in and sent him a PM.. if that account gets banned ill create another one and just keep quiet. lol

All the best of us get a ban for bringing down the pain once in a while.

I felt the stock f40 to be undriveable. No brakes, no grip, no turn in, oversteer on exit no matter what you do. f40 step 3 was a better experience. 599 feels awesome. Z4 feels ok, but quite numb

Quote from CSF :

Imola, Monaco losing 2nd, 90% of the European Grand Prix after the bad tyre call, McLaren were meh, but Mika could also be meh in 99.

Just typical McLaren shit really..

Quote from CSF :

Hakkinen and McLaren almost gifted him the title by being stupid.

McLaren but not Häkkinen, he made one mistake at Monza to memory but that was it.

Quote from Mustafur :

same could be said with Ferrari with Shumi but in 1999 when he broke his legs, suddenly the number 2 Irvine who looked like a useless second driver was suddenly championship material.

True dat!

Quote from JackDaMaster :

Reminds me of driving the street stock on Charlotte infield road at night.

LOL


Remember guys. Cars can barrel roll at low speed!

Quote from Töki (HUN) :

AWD RUF?!

Yea, it's that option that nobody chooses over RWD. So it's iRacings way of making their playerbase believe they got three cars for the price of one, when in reality they got 1 car for the price of a complete game.

Quote from DeKo :

Apparently it has the same tyre model as the rest of the NTM5 cars, as rolling in the updates to the tyre for just the RUF would **** up the rest of the NTM5 cars.

Because iRacing can't create a proper universal tyre model? It's silly. Anyone actually still paying for that crap needs better service than that. I mean they said something in response to how easy the Ruf is rolling over that it's a "preview release" or some shit.

Quote from tristancliffe :

because you now understand (perhaps) that this whole thread isn't about Mars Bars.

No it's about your drunken ramblings.

Quote from tristancliffe :

You do know that the symbol "2" refers to the second integer on the positive real number scale don't you? It doesn't refer to a cat. Or the sky. Maths has basic rules that make it easy to understand.

Your post = irrelevant shit.