NO. Rolling starts need to stay else the series is just another F1-like. I didn't like it in 07 when Champ Car went to a standing start. I'd rather have a rolling start for safety reasons (i.e. everyone already up to speed and no chance of a staller on the grid). Imagine the Indy 500 with a standing start. It would ruin years upon years of tradition.
Yes, get rid of that no blocking rule. I vividly remember CART in the mid-late 90s with Zanardi, strange there was a loosely enforced blocking rule then....All you Americans, imageine NASCAR with a no blocking rule and penalties like at Sonoma.
Barnhart. Yeah, fire him. Wasn't he gone after Homestead anyway? Whatever happened to that?
New car maybe? I can't see Kunos being allowed to add a full blown Porsche to the works, but if he fudges the name a bit I have a sneaky feeling it'll slip past.
Also, what track was that in the vid at....1:25-1:29?
When said padding takes away a chunk of the track and narrows the racing line? (See Bristol for instance, track narrowed.)
It'd be like putting padding all around Bathurst mustafur to make the track narrower than it already is. Suppose down Conrod they put SAFER barriers instead of the grass.
I'm sorry, but WG management, kindly **** off. The track does not need SAFER barriers. They are not helpful at all on road courses. A car hits at an extreme angle (think McDowell's wreck at Texas), it's gonna roll regardless. Also, cars get spat back off of SAFER barriers, whereas with a harder wall, it stops the car more suddenly.
IMO, SAFER barriers ought to be oval only. What's next, SAFER barriers at Infineon, RA, Road America, San Jose, Long Beach?
I get asked that daily, I've taken to turning up at work in a pentacle t-shirt and generally making it as obvious as possible and having the act number and the act taped to the inside of my jacket. Comes in really...really handy at times. I can just pull out the sheet of paper and print off more copies. Sidenote: They never did object to me carrying a sword into the stable however...
Either way, any truth to the rumour that the police want to use rubber bullets?
Kirpans are dull, I distinctly remember in my school (circa...about 9 or 10 years ago) a Sikh boy explaining the kirpan to his RS class, and going on about how it is meant
To go off topic for a moment...that law, at least for the police's view of it, is total BS.
I as a practicing Wiccan, carry my athame to my work/meetings (a riding stable which has a veeery small coven, I help with ceremonies there so it's needed that I take an athame. Which, for U41K's benifit, is a blunted blade), and I've been stopped five times in the last couple of months. I teach two Sikh kids who are amazing riders...they carry kirpans with them, go past the same police, nothing. Yes, some branches of Wicca do in fact require you to carry a bladed item at times (athame, sword for instance. Both blunt). Also, the law states you can carry a bladed item up to a certain size. Again, my work's fallen foul of this at least twice. Each time I've played the ceremonial aspect up. Once I got away with it, the other time they confiscated it and returned my blade within a week.
Let's assume that it does apply to any religion, then why is one (minority) religion being stopped and another (less minority) religion being allowed to carry blades? In an ideal world, it'd be one law for all.
As for the looters? Sending in the army won't help at all, it will just inflame the situation immensely. Water cannons are fairly effective, but hard to get a hold of. Or for that matter drive through a crowd of rioters.