well, i never use the TC especially in rallycross. illepall
what i meant is, that it seems to me that the devs want to turn the fz50 into the beginners car of the LRF class, while they just should make it a little faster to stand a chance against the almighty lx6.
hehehe, uhm ok. when S2 is final in 2 years i will really be looking forward to this pack (yes i actually forgot that one) .
Obviously you don't like rallycross at all, so i will excuse your ignorance. i guess broad tarmac track aren't boring, eh? we have so many of them already!
or do you prefer tight boring mud tracks?
Imho there are not enough decent rallycross tracks (imho FE5 is very bad), but the lack of decent rallycross cars is even more bad.
in real life rallycross tyre tracks don't affect the driver very much. there nearly aren't any tyretracks on the surface. it would just be eyecandy. we are talking about cars with too much horsepower for gravel/mud. they just transfer the mud away from the racing line.
the main problem are the holes that are getting deeper and deeper during a race and MUCH more important is the dirt on the tarmac which makes overtaking on the outside impossible in tarmac-turns after a mud-part (at least without recent track-service).
the holes form mostly at the same places, but the mud just has to be a little more dry/wet and the surface forms in another way.
either scawen can implement this in a very simple and arcadish way or he chooses not to do this. imho it's impossible to do this in a realistic way.
we don't have decent rx tyres yet, nor cars, nor starting grids etc. etc. yet, so i don't see how this will ever be implemented.
everyone who thinks that his/her real name is more personal than his/her nick name never had a real nick name. you cannot compare some name you just made up to disguise your identity with a nickname you have answered to for more than a decade.
everyone should do as he/she likes but don't mistake a realname for professionalism. it counts what you do on the track.