Ah okay.
I'm just wondering as there is no node-information sent by LFS on open configs but only position in MCI's...
I'm just wondering as there is no node-information sent by LFS on open configs but only position in MCI's...
He already stated, that the incompatible patch with the autocross changes has those speed bumps as objects.
in host config add the parameter flags with the corresponding value
e.g.
104 = 64 (ISF_CON) + 32 (ISF_MCI) + 8 (ISF_MSO_COLS)
e.g.
[localhost]
ip = "localhost"
port = 29999
socketType = 1
pps = 4
flags = 104104 = 64 (ISF_CON) + 32 (ISF_MCI) + 8 (ISF_MSO_COLS)
Sure. just wondering why you would need to create a custom one as I have no idea for which application one would need a custom pth.
The only vague idea would be to use well-known pth-visualizer to visualize custom layouts. But that's a one time which could be done in photoshop etc., too...
Without the laptop fix the patch would be worthless 
But determing who initiated the crash is pretty... hard... not to say impossible in some situations...
Like if the wrecker races normally and breaks suddenly 100m before the actual break point... Would the racer behind the wracker be liable for crashing into him?
And who is responsible for side-by-side crashed?
Like if the wrecker races normally and breaks suddenly 100m before the actual break point... Would the racer behind the wracker be liable for crashing into him?
And who is responsible for side-by-side crashed?
No tool as far as I know.
However why would you want to create a PTH file? LFS won't read your PTH file, thus not reporting back the node numbers.
However why would you want to create a PTH file? LFS won't read your PTH file, thus not reporting back the node numbers.
What exactly does "avoid CP check" do?
Which part isn't checked on a modified server? Is any modification on the client side allowed or must is be the same as on server side?
Which part isn't checked on a modified server? Is any modification on the client side allowed or must is be the same as on server side?
You could always add some sort of incremental counter which increments on each subspicious situation and the ban/kick/spec action is only performed, oncethe counter reaches a specific threshold.
Like an email spam filter which scores the email based on different aspects and only filters when the score is above a specified value.
Like an email spam filter which scores the email based on different aspects and only filters when the score is above a specified value.
Then for all those layout-creators:
Another hole is in South City next to the Sprint 2 start.
You could increase the insim version to 4.1 and state, that the minor version may change if non-breaking changes are introduced
I think he tries to figure out, how to compare two drivers if they are on different servers which started with a "big" timely difference. (big beeing 30 seconds?)
e.g.
Driver A on server A
Driver B on server B
The race on server A was started 10 seconds before the race on server B.
Driver A did 2 laps in 2 minutes.
Driver B did 2 laps in 1 minute 55 seconds.
The display on the website would display driver A in front of driver B for the short period of time between driver A finishing the second lap and driver B finishing the second lap because Driver A has a lap more.
The solution might be to store all events with a timestamp in the db and then only showing/sorting by events prior to now()-serverDifference.
e.g.
Driver A on server A
Driver B on server B
The race on server A was started 10 seconds before the race on server B.
Driver A did 2 laps in 2 minutes.
Driver B did 2 laps in 1 minute 55 seconds.
The display on the website would display driver A in front of driver B for the short period of time between driver A finishing the second lap and driver B finishing the second lap because Driver A has a lap more.
The solution might be to store all events with a timestamp in the db and then only showing/sorting by events prior to now()-serverDifference.
Why are you wasting your time by saying something obvious? ;°
I just wanted to point at sys_getloadavg but then I read the Notes... ^^
Well at least you could replace all the non-win stuff by it
Well at least you could replace all the non-win stuff by it
I already had done this.
Make sure to catch the changes to pack() and parsePackFormat() and to some other packets... :O
=>
<?php
$pck = new IS_REO();
$pck->NumP = 5;
$pck->PLID = array(1,2,3,4,5);
?>
Btw vic are you planning on http plugins? I had to hardcode my json output handling into your source... *g*
Where in that thread is android mentioned?
That's because of the NPL in the connections module
The constants are named ISP_xxx
-> ISP_MCI, ISP_CPR etc.
-> ISP_MCI, ISP_CPR etc.
What's the point of this thread?
Both drivers(+the guy doing the commentary) in the video agreed, that it's the 370z's fault....
Both drivers(+the guy doing the commentary) in the video agreed, that it's the 370z's fault....
But if he had no account before he was given the password he wasn't a lfs user and thus it was ok to give him the password as it's only forbidden to give the password to other lfs users. :O
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG