added toni to car 66 if we are allowed to do this, requested the roster change last night
teamName: Green Angus Racing
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
First on Active Standby - CALLED UP TO RACE
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {undertaker00, Toni Aničić, Croatia}
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
First on Active Standby - CALLED UP TO RACE
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {undertaker00, Toni Aničić, Croatia}
Last edited by jmeade, .
Reason : Flagged Car 62 as first on active standby
Someone can be more precise, but the setup file format changed at some point in LFS's development
The [AA] and the MRc demo servers are usually decent as far as demo servers go, give them a try.
+ eleventy billion
As soon as you put in a "rule" regarding hitting, you then require an admin to watch that corner for 24 hours...or have someone monitoring an in-sim for 24 hours. That is its own problem. Then you have to ask what constitutes a "hit". Is it brushing it hard enough that causes it to disappear and be reset or do you have to send the post flying? If you do it by in-sim, what happens if you are fairly beside someone and they force you into the post, you then have to have an appeal/protest system for false pole hits?
In my opinion, you absolutely can not write a rule along the lines of "if you hit it a few times, you are ok...if you hit it a lot it is a penality". That will just cause a massive *poop* storm when the first penality or warning is applied, what constitutes a few, what constitutes a lot?
I think the by far easiest way to do it is to not have a rule and let the layout enforce its-self, if you can hit a post and keep going...then fine, if you go farther and brush a tire and get away with it...then fine...as soon as you cut enough, the tire bundle will punish you, maybe additional tires need to be added to make it more punishing
In my opinion, you absolutely can not write a rule along the lines of "if you hit it a few times, you are ok...if you hit it a lot it is a penality". That will just cause a massive *poop* storm when the first penality or warning is applied, what constitutes a few, what constitutes a lot?
I think the by far easiest way to do it is to not have a rule and let the layout enforce its-self, if you can hit a post and keep going...then fine, if you go farther and brush a tire and get away with it...then fine...as soon as you cut enough, the tire bundle will punish you, maybe additional tires need to be added to make it more punishing
Last edited by jmeade, .
teamName: Green Angus Racing
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {seldon, András Szarka, Hungary}
- {GreyBull [CHA], Yann Laprevotte, France}
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {Sn1p, Matīss Linde, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {GenesisX, Brian Wong, Canada}
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {troy, Kevin Leu, Switzerland}
- {kars19, Kristaps Dzelzgalvis, Latvia}
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {seldon, András Szarka, Hungary}
- {GreyBull [CHA], Yann Laprevotte, France}
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {Sn1p, Matīss Linde, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {GenesisX, Brian Wong, Canada}
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {troy, Kevin Leu, Switzerland}
- {kars19, Kristaps Dzelzgalvis, Latvia}
Last edited by jmeade, .
Reason : edited as per Rony's correction
...Just throwing it out there for discussion...
is there any consideration for running the race the same way the MoE race was done last year. Allow shift + p for upside down cars and maybe make it a hefty penalty (2-3 laps). I am thinking by looking at the MoE results last year, there would have only been 17 finishers in that race as 13 shift + p at some point of the race. This is a marque race for NDR, it is a marque race for LFS as a whole, the stream will have a large audience, do we only want 1/2 the cars running at the finish?
Personally I do not mind, we ran all 24 hours without a shift +p last year, we did the 2011 16 Hour in a UFR with only one. But I am not looking forward to getting hit by some fool on lap 1.
I am not a fan of the safety car for all the above mentioned reasons (running for 10 hours, building up a lead and losing it all...and the restart madness). I think the code 80 would be difficult to implement, but this is for the admins to comment on. With the code 80, when it is all said and done, it has no effect on the outcome of the race: the leader still has his lead, the guy is still 10 seconds from getting lapped etc etc, but the admins had to do a lot of work to make sure everyone obeyed and did not gain an advantage, it feels like a lost effort to me.
...I am still fairly inexperienced at this, i know what code 80 is, i have not really seen it at work, i have never seen it in LFS so if I am talking out of my ass, let me know. Just trying to contribute to the discussion
is there any consideration for running the race the same way the MoE race was done last year. Allow shift + p for upside down cars and maybe make it a hefty penalty (2-3 laps). I am thinking by looking at the MoE results last year, there would have only been 17 finishers in that race as 13 shift + p at some point of the race. This is a marque race for NDR, it is a marque race for LFS as a whole, the stream will have a large audience, do we only want 1/2 the cars running at the finish?
Personally I do not mind, we ran all 24 hours without a shift +p last year, we did the 2011 16 Hour in a UFR with only one. But I am not looking forward to getting hit by some fool on lap 1.
I am not a fan of the safety car for all the above mentioned reasons (running for 10 hours, building up a lead and losing it all...and the restart madness). I think the code 80 would be difficult to implement, but this is for the admins to comment on. With the code 80, when it is all said and done, it has no effect on the outcome of the race: the leader still has his lead, the guy is still 10 seconds from getting lapped etc etc, but the admins had to do a lot of work to make sure everyone obeyed and did not gain an advantage, it feels like a lost effort to me.
...I am still fairly inexperienced at this, i know what code 80 is, i have not really seen it at work, i have never seen it in LFS so if I am talking out of my ass, let me know. Just trying to contribute to the discussion
No massive wall of text this time...but it is time to reveal the lineup for the GT1 World Series Round 4: The 24 Hours of Kyoto
so forgive the nOOb question (I think i already know the answer...just want to confirm) I just want to confirm that the the standard GT1WS rule still stands that if you flip means you are out of the race.
I only have experience in these long race with the RM 16 Hour and the 2012 MoE 24 Hour, they both allowed shift+p...but as far as I know, for this round the standard GT1WS rules still stand and have no exception to allow for re-joins after flips.
I only have experience in these long race with the RM 16 Hour and the 2012 MoE 24 Hour, they both allowed shift+p...but as far as I know, for this round the standard GT1WS rules still stand and have no exception to allow for re-joins after flips.
...so...yeah...never mind
Last edited by jmeade, .
Team name: Angry Angus Racing
Number: 34
Car: XR3
Drivers:
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {GenesisX, Brian Wong, Canada}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
Number: 34
Car: XR3
Drivers:
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {GenesisX, Brian Wong, Canada}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
Forgive the nOOb question, setting up for our first Gt3 race
Is qualifying this weekend (Jan 19th) and the race next weekend (Jan 26th)
Is qualifying this weekend (Jan 19th) and the race next weekend (Jan 26th)
Edited about 10 minutes after posting
teamName: Green Angus Racing
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {FalconBridge, Patrick Hall, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
Last edited by jmeade, .
Reason : Removed wody21, added Falcon Bridge
Thank you so very much guys for what you have done for sim racing as a whole. Personally I have 11 years of casual sim racing under my belt, in 4 different sims, in I don't know how many different leagues. Despite the fact that in your races I am truly a back marker, your races have been the events I have gotten the most enjoyment, frustration, lost the most sleep over but have had the most fun and get the greatest pride from.
I am truly proud to be a racer and team manager in NDR leagues, they are amongst the top tier of sim-racing.
Here's to NDR, may they live 1000 years!
I am truly proud to be a racer and team manager in NDR leagues, they are amongst the top tier of sim-racing.
Here's to NDR, may they live 1000 years!
The track was described as looking like a battleground in the bonus race
19 started, 6 were rolling at the end
http://i.imgur.com/8z9QU.jpg
19 started, 6 were rolling at the end
http://i.imgur.com/8z9QU.jpg
teamName: Green Angus Racing
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
Car 62 is 4th on Waiting List
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {RLeb, Rejean LeBlanc, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
Car 66 is 8th on Waiting List
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
Car 62 is 4th on Waiting List
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {RLeb, Rejean LeBlanc, Canada}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
Car 66 is 8th on Waiting List
AWWWWW ... I wanted 30 guys racing LX4's at FE1
That would have been an amazing ... crash ( was going to say race there but thought better of it)
That would have been an amazing ... crash ( was going to say race there but thought better of it)
Moved Eclipsed from Car 66 to 62, team roster change e-mail has been sent in under "dire circumstances" as allowed in rule IV.5
teamName: Green Angus Racing
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
ON ACTIVE STANDBY - P31 IN PRE-QUALIFYING
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {RLeb, Rejean LeBlanc, Canada}
ON WAITING LIST - P34 IN PRE-QUALIFYING
class: GT1-Am
car: XRR
number: 62
drivers:
- {Invecs, Rolands Kampars, Latvia}
- {jmeade, Jared Meade, Canada}
- {wody21, Zoltán Gácsi, Hungary}
- {Eclipsed, Rony Kronpušs, Latvia}
ON ACTIVE STANDBY - P31 IN PRE-QUALIFYING
---
teamName: Green Angus Racing 2
class: GT1-Am
car: FZR
number: 66
drivers:
- {JayEyeBee, Jonathan Björnson, Canada}
- {RLeb, Rejean LeBlanc, Canada}
ON WAITING LIST - P34 IN PRE-QUALIFYING
Last edited by jmeade, .
Reason : moved Eclipsed to car 62
Is it only me who can't get on the Pre-Qualifying Server? "Host not found on master server"
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG