SoftTH needs 2 video cards on dual-head cards such as the GTX260 - if he wants 3 screens off one card then it needs to have the capability of running 3 outputs - the GTX260 certainly doesn't have that
Hate to burst the bubble there but you've coupled an LGA1366 board with an LGA775 processor. Bit of a no-no, since it won't work
Assuming no SLi is needed, might I suggest http://www.newegg.ca/Product/P ... aspx?Item=N82E16813131347 as a replacement for the motherboard?
I've got my Q9400 (essentially the same as the Q9450, just with half the L2 cache) comfortably to 3.4GHz with a Freezer 7 Pro on stock volts. If I want to go higher I'll need to get better RAM (I'm on DDR2-800, didn't originally intend to overclock it).
Now now, you should have looked at the link first, really
Anyway, back on topic: Brundle for the BBC is great news. He really knows his F1 (mainly due to having driven in it himself) and was EASILY the better commentator ITV had.
I'm only aware of having dual screen setups with the ability for a single accelerated window to span them all. When you go from 2 to 3 you need to start using seperate X screens with Xinerama (instead of nvidia's Twinview or MergedFB) to get the ability to span windows. Of course, this kills off any and all ability to run LFS in them, since OpenGL acceleration gets totally hosed. So, you're pretty much limited to dual screen, which if you're using TwinView/MergedFB it'll create one large virtual desktop that the LFS window can span across.
The 701 is slow, small and has a VERY poor battery. You'll be lucky to get 2 hours out of it. (I have one myself, put ArchLinux on it and put a 1GB RAM stick in. I've tweaked the system for battery life and yet get about 2 hours 10 at most). Personally I'd have gone for a 901, better battery life, faster AND more storage space. Well worth the extra money.
Regarding the 2004 one: Isn't it funny how Virginia, Colorado, Iowa, Nevada AND Ohio ALL voted Democrat, as did Florida. A purely unscientific observation, but
Well let's just say it's the Americans (AND British, you're not alone over there) that the Taleban are bombing, not their own. And it's not "one of those things that happened". It happened BECAUSE the Americans (and Brits) went in. How can you bomb that which is not there?
Saddam was hung because the Americans went in. They were hung by the Iraqi Government, which is being propped up by the Americans.
He was denouncing, not disowning. Two totally different things. To denounce is to criticise a set of remarks. To disown is to totally seperate yourself from someone. I'm no fan of religion but I'm not going to criticise Obama for having a pastor with them beliefs. Obama's beliefs are his own.
And the Marxism is where? That just looks like a hate-inciting video to me.
Liberalism is a hell of a change from the Bush Doctrine.
Have you actually seen any coverage from these countries or are you just making that up?
No, this is an international celebration.
You're scared of someone who is a great presence on the world stage before he's elected? These "empty" promises actually have some realistic chance of happening, now the Democrats have majorities in both the Senate and the House.
I'm not going to doubt that. However, I think that if McCain had have got in he'd have been likely to start a war that would annoy Russia even more. Bad news.
Again, I'm not going to argue with the fact that it won't be easy. It's not, but the chances that Obama can pull it off are greater than the chances that McCain could have.
Just because he is does not make him Communist himself. Stop making judgements you cannot make.
+1 on the hope. I hope he's up to it. Which he is, IMO.
Reasons: Christmas is too commercialised. The reason for it to exist is no longer seen by the vast majority of the country and since I don't believe said original reason I don't see why gifts should be given (or received). Also, it causes SO MANY rows when unequal amounts of effort are put in. Not worth it.