Saddam was hung because the Americans went in. They were hung by the Iraqi Government, which is being propped up by the Americans.
He was denouncing, not disowning. Two totally different things. To denounce is to criticise a set of remarks. To disown is to totally seperate yourself from someone. I'm no fan of religion but I'm not going to criticise Obama for having a pastor with them beliefs. Obama's beliefs are his own.
And the Marxism is where? That just looks like a hate-inciting video to me.
Liberalism is a hell of a change from the Bush Doctrine.
Have you actually seen any coverage from these countries or are you just making that up?
No, this is an international celebration.
You're scared of someone who is a great presence on the world stage before he's elected? These "empty" promises actually have some realistic chance of happening, now the Democrats have majorities in both the Senate and the House.
I'm not going to doubt that. However, I think that if McCain had have got in he'd have been likely to start a war that would annoy Russia even more. Bad news.
Again, I'm not going to argue with the fact that it won't be easy. It's not, but the chances that Obama can pull it off are greater than the chances that McCain could have.
Just because he is does not make him Communist himself. Stop making judgements you cannot make.
+1 on the hope. I hope he's up to it. Which he is, IMO.
Reasons: Christmas is too commercialised. The reason for it to exist is no longer seen by the vast majority of the country and since I don't believe said original reason I don't see why gifts should be given (or received). Also, it causes SO MANY rows when unequal amounts of effort are put in. Not worth it.
WINE: Different architecture (PPC vs x86) The code simply won't run.
Emulators: Simply too slow to emulate both a processor and a 3D card (in fact, 3D acceleration hasn't even been started in emulators). Maybe if someone works out how to use all the cores of the Cell on the PS3 then it would be possible. The emulation would have to be *really* good, however.
No, you weren't. You were quoting a bus width (that is, a number of bits with no time unit). In terms of graphics card and memory bit rate is not a valid phrase for anything. You're looking for "bandwidth". But again, in this case you were referring to a bus width (ie 256, 512 bit). Now, can we all just STFU about this topic and help the OP?
EDIT: I see you've realised you were wrong and edited your post. Nice
There'll be no wild time here - spent a good chunk of student loans on a new PC (I DID need it...), so now can't really afford the lifestyle of the nutter! It's good so far, although boring - all the stuff we're doing so far is stuff I already know!
is.gd is a URL shortening service, nothing more, it just forwards to the actual URL. </offtopic>
Anyway, anyone I know well enough to see my Facebook gets added on there. Anyone else gets my Twitter account (or Plurk, depending on which they use) - they use my Second Life name, so noone really finds out too much about me from them.
You said yourself you're not experienced at all with computer hardware. If I were you I wouldn't overclock at all - you're liable to do damage to your hardware if you try and push it too far. It's fine as it is
No it won't. The P4 was extremely badly designed - Netburst was a failure for Intel. A 2.4GHz Q6600 is (even in single threaded apps) faster than a 3.2GHz P4, simply because of architectural superiority. Core 2 didn't just multiply the number of cores, you know