Approx 10 cm, with Enhance pointer precision ON (acceleration in XP). I've just tried it with OFF and it cuts the mouse travel by half (to 5 cm); it also seems more responsive and precise, but... sux on desktop and I cba control paneling everytime...
Hey yow, Scawen, maybe add a mouse accel. on/off option?

Hi, Win XP:
installer (the Z25-Z26) works flawlessly, aswell as file associations, but connecting via URL link in Opera doesn't (check after quote). One thing I noticed is that README_Z26.txt wasn't created.
I plan to keep my last LFS version of current physics and install new full patch in different folder, so one quick question about how file associations will be handled with multiple LFS installations:
- after new patch(s) installation, will the associations (should I chose to install them) then be tied to that new LFS.exe location?

Quote from SiL-X :

Opera didn´t work here!
If i install Z26 it works just ONE TIME!
There is a entry in Opera (Watch attachment) with a %1 behind?

Confirmed, I'm also using Opera (10). When Opera asks you 'Do you want to proceed?' and you tick on 'Do not show this dialog again' before clicking Yes - Opera automatically adds protocol but with the '%1' at the end. After trying to connect second time you get 'No registered application for this extension' error message. If you leave 'Do not show this dialog again' unticked before clicking Yes - then it will always work.
But if I add 'lfs' protocol in Opera manually, or edit the existing one (with the '%1') by tieing it to LFS.exe myself - then it works fine. Only then the grayed out location with '%1' remains visible and can't be deleted - an eyesore (attachment, don't mind folder name saying it's Z25 - it's patched to Z26). Would be cool if possible to fix.

Quote from N I K I :

Since I sow like million posts in Z19 I thought someone has noticed, but now I see Z20 and same problem is still there. I drove just XFG a little bit last night, so I don't know about other cars, I guess they're fine.
I found this little bug, this sign on dashboard for headlights is kinda blinking. I also noticed this happens only with bigger FOV than dunno like 90, so here's a little photo of the problem attached too.

Hey N I K I! No, it ain't a bug, just a hardware limitation of the monitor. On a wider FOV the icon is much smaller so lets say 40 pixels are trying to render what 80 should do. That is why some detail is left out. When he g forces affect the camera view position the icon is drawn in slightly different position. That, along with the loss of detail makes the icon to be drawn without some of the little blue lines in one frame, and in the next one they're back but others are missing. It appears to be blinking but it's not.

User interface/mouse alignment after alt+tab full screen startup is fixed. Didn't had a chance to test Test1. No flickering problem with windowed startup, then shift+F4 to full screen.
Win XP.

:bullwhip:
1:59:59
:checkered
Go Go Go... I know you can do it !

Also Opera 10.00 Beta 2 user - no problem here. Nothing pops out.
I couldn't reproduce it, check attachment.
Win XP, latest Java. 'Exceptions Have Stacktrace' from attachment is ticked off.

Sketch comedy (2 min):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYUxxtrWiQk&fmt=18
:bananadea:dogrun::doctor:

Quote from Mikjen :

Sorry to sound thick

/autokick=10 mins says it needs a parameter ?

or am i typing it wrong ?

Mick

Autokick command in patch Z has four parameters:

(from 'Commands.txt' in your docs folder)

Hi,

When changing cars, two camera positions are remembered: the horizontal and the vertical angle. That's nice.

I suggest two new things:

1. remember zoom level
   
2. remember last skin used (not just last car but - all cars! Even after shut-down)
   

Ok... it's holidays, after shut-down is optional
It would make similar skins on different cars easily comparable.

Running second CMX viewer instance, adjusting camera to match first instance, alt-tab'in... not good enuff. And you know it

Thanks

Hi,

Quote from Gai-Luron :

... If Yes try this in your browser

www.lfsworld.net/pubstat/get_stat2.php?version=1.3&idk=[B]your_pub_idk[/B]&action=wr

Do you have a child protection?

I use Opera - this works great, cool

Child protection - can't find that, probably OFF
Windows Firewall - OFF

Also, if this is relevant:
Automatic Updates - OFF (since day 1)
Internet Explorer - Version 6! (I never use it)
Maybe newer versions add parts that I must have in order for trackInfo to work?

I've also played with Windows Internet Properties settings (Security & Privacy tabs) - changed everything to LOW. Then ran ConvWr.bat - no results.

Thanks

Hi,

Quote from Gai-Luron :

... This utility don't work on vista or XP 64. You must recompile it prior to use it with this systems ...

I have XP Sp2. Recompile? My programing skills = 0

Quote from Gai-Luron :

... What is your result file???? ( Only th beginning ) ...

ConvWr.bat starts, connects (in 3rd line on screen - " ... ; is a valid LFS username), then crashes. There is no result file (trackInfo.cfg).

Quote from Gai-Luron :

... Only work with last version of Lapper ...

Do you mean:
a) trackInfo.cfg works only with last version of Lapper? (Yes, I know)
b) trackInfo utility works only with last version of Lapper?
If b), then must I unzip trackInfo1.3.zip in Lapper folder?
Also, my trackInfo utility folder is not read-only.
Thanks

Hi,

Quote from Tim NL :

... Did you tried my ConvWr.bat?
You have to run the ConvWr.bat file not the .exe ...

Yes. Don't work.

Anyway, I'm not convinced anymore that problem is on my side:
- contradictory information inside of ConvWr.bat (-t instead of -i; missing -mlc)
- contradictory information after launch of ConvWr.exe ("only" -t instead of -i this time)
- "Input string was not in correct format" error message indicates faulty programing (many things can change since June 2007!)

Just to be sure I'm talking about trackInfo1.3 (only version available to me), that has been ran right after un-ziping, as in: DEFAULT state! (with my own Idk)

Thanks again for all help Tim, but problem isn't that simple.
EDIT: I know now I really DO have a working version (confirmed by Tim NL - Thanks ), but I still can't get it to produce me a trackInfo.cfg on my PC, despite everything.

Cheers

Last edited by Nilex, Sat 6 Dec 2008, 23:05. Reason : small update

Hi again,
Thanks for trying to help me out Tim, and for confirming that premium thingy is not needed
I've tried all that kids stuff . Thing is - it don't work!

Have you tried it on your side, with your Idk?
Just to confirm it really works, and that the problem is on my side
Thanks

Hi,

This thread caught my eye because my video card is from same series (X1950). And, same thing here too.
Don't worry much, it's called "Texture Flickering". Happens when there are multiple texture stacked atop each other, also, mip bias has something to do with it. If you browse internet abit you'll see that it happens all over the place - ATI/AMD, nVidia - don't make a difference.

I haven't found a way to get rid of it, but here is one interesting observation: screeny from your post is Aston something track, if you try and reproduce it in Blackwood or South City tracks (most recent tracks in graphical updates terms) you'll see that problem is completely gone in Blackwood and barely visible in South City. So, could be driver related and/or LFS related. Point is: nothing you can do about it but wait it out till it gets fixed. But hey, if you find a way lemme know right here

Sorry, I don't know the texture name.

Cheers

Quote :

For this case, I left DEFAULT settings (to make it easily reproducible), only placed Idk in correct place.

Yes Tim, I did that before I made my 1st post here = no results.

Does it require premium PUBSTAT? Could anyone confirm this? Maybe application is outdated (June 2007 in Readme.txt)?

Thanks!

Hi,

I've been trying to get this nice application (bottom of Post 1) to work but I always get this error (attachment). There is no sign of trackInfo.cfg.
I've followed readme.txt instructions: placed my own Idk, etc... Internet connection was on, firewall wasn't blocking. NET 2.0; 3.0; 3.5 installed.

The default coefs are no good for me so I wanted to make my own.
For this case, I left DEFAULT settings (to make it easily reproducible), only placed Idk in correct place.

So, what is the problem? Does it require premium PUBSTAT?

Much better over 0.2
Exelent application

LoL!

That's fast :P

I hoped it's only moving the stitch little right in "Leather3_join.dds".

Thanks again mate

This is great work man
I like the yellow one because I can see interior more clearer
Thanks alot!
I really appreciate You took the time to include default files too - good thinking!

Off-topic request:
Do You know if it would be possible to move the stitch on the wheel in the dead center (where the polygons meet)? To the spot I marked red on the screeny.

Game designer moved it slightly to the left - extremely annoying!

If You can do it would be great (and could be applied to XRG/XRT wheels as well)
Enjoy Your holidays!

Hi,
Great work on Z guys, gratz

Quote from [RF]-art555 :

Quote from diNOSaur :

What has changed in XFG physics?
Just wondering why hotlaps are removed...

New interior alters physics calculation

More precisely: from what I saw in garage "Info" tab, car is 2kg heavier and weight balance is 0.1% more to the rear. Because of that Yxx XFG hotlap replyes are obsolete (Yxx mpr's are okay).

Last edited by Nilex, Wed 2 Jul 2008, 17:30. Reason : Added last line

Hi,
I never commented on your work before guys so let me say now that I congratulate you all on everything that has been done so far - it's truly amazing work
Also, good luck with everything that lies ahead - I wish all the best

One thing:

Quote from Scawen :

... Today's test patch will include updated interiors for the XF and XR (GTR and road) cars... ... When Patch Z is released, the existing hotlaps for eight of the cars (XFG / UFR / XFR / XRT / RB4 / XRR / FXR / FZR) will need to be deleted...

Doesn't XRG belong on this list too?

This message appears is "List of Hosts" (LoH) screen.
(Tested in patches Y and Y24)

How to reproduce:
- in LoH screen, click refresh. Stop refresh (we only need one host for this)
- click |?| to open host window and leave it open
- then, set CARS filters to ALL and all HOSTS filters to [yes] (waiting for reply lasts longest - we need this for testing purposes)
- click refresh and while waiting for reply (before hosts start showing up) quickly press X (on that host window we left opened) to close it
- Error while waiting for reply

After clicking ok, you're back in "Multiplayer" screen. No harm done. I just thought that You would like to know about this :P

Thanks for reading

Amazing work!
Works like a charm
Thank You very much for this!

Quote from Dark Elite :

... I was thinking of the timing required to match your gearshift keystroke with your clutch keystroke ...

Hehe, it does require timing but not in a way it sounds when You said it (sorry if I wasn't clear enough). If I understood correctly, You mean: gearshift + clutch (simultaneously - at the same time) to change gears. I would be insane (I am a little, but not that much :P {but, by the end of this thread... who knows }) to use manual clutch if it worked like that. It would require tremendous amount of luck to do it right (practise wouldn't mean s*** here - especially with high/max button control rate). In reality it works like this: gearshift (press and hold) + clutch. Clutch needs to be pressed after gearshift (not simultaneously - but they are pressed at the same time at one point). That's easy with a few laps practise

Quote from AndroidXP :

The pre-select shift method allowed people with H-gate shifters to make insanely quick shifts....

Yes, I see what You mean. Good good, now we're getting somewhere
Basically, You're saying that pre-select H-gate shifters players combine benefits of a wheel and button shift with insanely quick shifts. Am I right? Well, shift can only be fast as fast you can push your clutch (pedal/button/whatever). But changing gears speed is limited by the H-gate shifter mechanism and the speed of your arm. For example: try imagine you have to down shift four gears quickly (if your aim is quick lap that is): 6-5-clutch-4-clutch-3-clutch-2-clutch (non-skip pre-select). I can do this faster with my fingers on buttons than anyone on this planet can do it with arm on H-gate shifter. So the issue is not insanely quick shifts with H-gate shifter, but insanely quick shifts with buttons. The pre-select don't influence shift speed.

Quote from AndroidXP :

... It pretty effectively prevented mis-shifts, too....

That's partially true, no argue there. But my guess is that it's not difficult to improve that with practise. Who mis shifts? Is it the mechanism's fault or the player's? It's interesting. One thing - you CAN mis shift with pre-select too: say you put from 5th to 7th accidentally (who watches gearstick in race anyway - :eclipseeh <--- this guy ain't) - press clutch - nothing happens (non-skip pre-select) :P

Quote from AndroidXP :

... At the very first the ultra-stabilised keyboard assist was removed, now throttle blip and cut are gone, as is a comfortable shifting method ... ... Reimplementing these keyboard-conveniences would be a step backwards, IMO.

Come on, don't put words in my mouth (like "we" gonna put some :soccer: :soccer: :soccer: in "your" net on 8.6. )

Yow Smo, mates stick together, eh? :grouphug: Tnx

Thank You

Thanks for your feedback.
I see that you like my post - well, since this forum is the official one (6th line) to post for Improvement Suggestions, some degree of quality must be maintained. At least that is how I feel about it.

Sorry AndroidXP, but your post is 100% wrong - just kidding, up to the 1st "," it's good (nothing personally) :P
Let's see:

Quote from AndroidXP :

... however the point is that LFS is supposed to be played with a wheel. Keyboard and mouse support are rudimentary on purpose, because they are mainly there to allow new racers to try the sim before they commit themselves and buy a wheel.

When I read it 1st time it made me laugh. It sounds like You programed the game yourself. Unless You know more via private channels, wheel is highly recommended and should be used (LINK). Until it says: required - leaves plenty of room for mouse/keyboard, don't You think? Furthermore, it is far from truth to say mouse/keyboard support are rudimentary. Actually, it is among the best on the racing games market (well that's arguable, my knowledge on that is not perfect :P).
About me missing a point - none taken . But let me repeat what You said in Your 2nd part of 2nd sentence - I'll only leave one word out: "Coding improvements would be a waste of time". Sounds bad doesn't it? Well keyboard/mouse support IS here, it IS great, but it CAN be better - hence my thread.

sinbad: Just use auto-clutch [no]. It's what it's there for. I did - never set it to [Yes] since :P

Dark Elite: Good post
I agree, it's not realistic to button shift (not for all cars though). However it is absolutely the same as shifting with manual clutch (already implemented). It is not easier, it is not harder, it is not same - only difference is: it requires one less keystroke at the same time. So, to remove button shifting means: axis clutch only. And that (even I know) will not happen anytime soon (if I can guess: never). Few thousand reasons (I don't know all their names :P)

- Please no more buy wheel/alternative-controller posts, I appreciate your suggestions but I'm fully aware of those. If and when I acquire a wheel is my own business. Stick to the topic only.

Thank you