It used to be the case that AMDs were better for gaming, comparing Athlons to P4s. But it's all changed now.
My pc (boola in the charts) does super pi 1M in 11sec. My P4 3.2 extreme used to do it in 36, so for raw number crunching power my new computer is 3x faster and lfs is completely cpu bound in that benchmark.
Try a super pi and see what time you get... The numbers in the lfsbench look fairly believable to me.
I think the runoff is a good idea and just like it would be on a normal circuit.
I think you should only get punished if you use it consistently or maybe more than once in case it was a genuine lockup or coming together which resulted in you going off. Otherwise people will be forced to drive back onto the track and turnaround which will cause trouble.
I'm never going to be able to prove it to anyone so I suggest that you use a program like TAT to slow your cpu down and try it yourself. Can you be bothered to do that? I expect it's easier to dismiss what someone is saying as rubbish
ps it's a Sun monitor, don't know the model number, think it's a rebranded sony trinitron
100hz at those settings and I know what you're going to say, that I can only get max of 100fps well my friend has a 60hz lcd so there's more to it than that
My computer runs crysis pretty well but it's a different type of game, you don't need to find 100ths of a second
I agree a laptop from last year can play lfs very well. I'm just saying that I go quicker with 150fps compared to 100fps.
To get 150 fps you only need a 2.5ghz core + a semi decent graphics card I would think, how much graphics card you need depends on how much AA and AF you want and not much else.
I had a geforce 5500, ati 9800 pro and x800 xl agp cards. Trust me, the x800 is soooooooooo much faster than the 5500, when using AA+AF, 10X faster is not out of the question.