However, the first person I remember driving on a server with and thinking WoW, that guys nuts, was SpankyDave...... actually it's sparkyDave but I thought he was called SpankyDave!!!
Tony Gardner addressed that issue though. He said that once Limerock had completed their work they'd go back. I don't think Limerock have absolutely completed stuff yet..... like Silverstone.
Based on what you've said Deko, what needs to happen is that one or two people that are generally regarded as the faster drivers, drive all 3 cars at a few different tracks and go by that. People like myself and a lot of the middle of the pack racers aren't much use to setting the restrictions.
As long as they're not FZR aficionados, then you should get an idea of what the quick guys can do though as it's amateur league, it needs amateurs that would drive in it to do the testing, in my view.
I'm talking averages Phil..... not one car that was way better than the general load of drivers! Now who doesn't get it... geez! You'll do what you will anyway. you're obviously right, as always so no point discussing it...
When looking at average times I did two things. Firstly look at average times from previous season to see what the overall spread was based on the averages and restrictions used and had a quick look at the stats from when I was on the server too.....
I understood before. It's your comprehension of what I understand that is wrong!
Check logs... was there last night with people from my team which is why I posted what I did! Please try not to comprehend that there is only one answer here and it has to be yours
I'm just going on the testing we did last night. I also drove some laps on some of the other tracks and the results were what I expected, which is why I said what I did in my last post above. There will always be one team that drives a particular car better than the general cohort but to really analyse whether restrictions are right, use averages and I think you'll see if you look at averages, the results are a little different from what you've tried to explain. That's what I've looked in to and what results I found to be right. If I'm wrong on that, so be it but right now I just still think the same after finding out what I know to be what I expected.
I'm sorry if you feel I am not comprehending anything of what is going on. However, sometimes you are equally wrong with comprehension "iRacing Mazda competition!!".
Going by the times, the FXR should have 1% taken off the test limits still. If the goal is to still keep the FXR under powered compared to the RWD cars then its brilliant as it is!
One has to remember that this is supposed to be an "amateur" event and not for the super fast like happened last year. If that's the case I still think the FXR is slower than its rivals and should be allowed to be a little closer.
Some people say that the FXR should be slower as it's easier to drive. I don't buy that as an amateur league. The object [to me] should be about getting the cars pretty close, irrespective of ease of driving. That's what creates better competition overall.....
I'm not sure you'd EASILY finish top 5... or you'd probably have tried to get there, especially considering its a free trip to NY and as you'd finish EASILY< a good chance of the $10,000 prize!