I bet digital speedos were pretty slow in your pappy's day. If GP1 drivers look at their speedos a lot, are you saying that makes them somehow good? Call me crazy, but I would think the ones who watched the road with confidence did better.
Meh. Only because you're used to using it as a crutch. Or you want to brag about how fast you went through some notorious twisty. You should be able to obtain a wee bit more than "an idea" by other means.
The bottom line is speedometers are read out of either fear or curiosity.
Oh, yeah. To further shatter your dreams, there are way too many languages and dialects and accents to take into account. And on top of that people will be typing stuff like "tlolzpwnd u n00b."
Well, I donno about Georgia, but in California you're gonna need to know precisely how fast you're going on the freeway in the event of pig intrusion, six o'clock. Are you really gonna know whether you were going 72 or 74 at a glance with an analogue? Nopers, broseph.
(also, you'd better be prepared to know the differences between indicated speeds and real speeds at different values)
If you're familiar with the car you just need a tach. Or even just your ears. But that's on the road. The only reason you really need a speedo is the police--otherwise, who cares? On the track, average speed (lap times) are good enough. But even corner to corner, there's no way your revs won't be an accurate enough indication of speed. Remember: KMH and MPH are arbitrary! If in some sport someone really needs the exact speed for some setup optimisation or what have you, that will be readily available to him via telemetry and/or speed traps. Where that information is not available, it can't be that big of a deal.
P.S. I was not aware real F1 cars had speedometers . . . do they indeed?
My car (mini) has a HUGE analogue speedo right smack in the middle http://static.flickr.com/11/16175812_b0b856c698.jpg ...but do I use that? Nope. I turn the tiny digital speedo on under the tach! Would anyone really use an analogue speedo over a digital one in their real car (provided the digital one has a good refresh rate)?
The problem is people will always find something to gripe about in a simulated real track. "This corner's wrong" or "there's a fence there" or "the grass is greener" or whatever. However with a fantasy one, it's always perfect. It's just way too much work. Eric could make several wonderful fantasy tracks in the time it would take him to accurately reproduce the Nürburgring (or any other real track).
Well, we got windshields in the formula cars (if you dare set your view to a realistic height!!), but currently you can't see skid marks or the racing "groove" through them... oh, yeah--that should be fixed too.
Has been suggested a few times before. In fact, I first suggested this almost five years ago. Unfortunately Scawen said he's not going to add any more features for mouse/KB drivers.
He said something along the lines of those inputs being used only till a user obtains a proper wheel. I own a wheel but prefer mouse/KB.