Quote from G!NhO :

It's a little fwd, sometimes when they go round corners they lift the inside back wheel so it is possible to lock the back wheel up.

I know but is that XFG really supposed to look like it's entering a corner?

Let me have a guess, too. It's a tank, not a car?

Quote from G!NhO :

Thats called a lock up....

Have you used your licence and raced LFS? A lock up in the back, where do you get your setups from?

Great job JO53PHS on the voting system, in my eyes a big improvement in fairness and competition.

I just voted.

Quote from AndRand :

I looks like he didtn't cut the shadow - it is blurred and therefore moved a bit.

Don't really see that, it's just that the car shadow in LFS has always the same brightness. Outside this looks good but directly under the car the shadow is too light.

Quote from AndRand :

First, you take to shots - one with the car and second without.

Then you blur the background.

Next you cut the car WITH the shadow (it is not moving) and paste it on the blurred background.

You don't have to tell me and I also think that TuomasH used the same technique. Where do you see evidence for the method you thought of?

Quote from PedraumF :

[...] stop caring so much for stupid little things. It's a fictional track
[...]
And for hell, I understand you, 65D.

How does that fit together? He cares about Westhill just as much as anyone else does, who stated his point.

Quote from Flame CZE :

But you are a demo racer, which means you cannot drive the FXR, only XFG, XRG and FBM.

Oh for heavens sake! He can, if he has got a crack, macsy, you know that, Flame CZE you know that, I know it and basically everbody else on this forum does. You want to trick him to admit he cracked the game so he gets banned? So what? He'll create another account and still use the crack.

Edit:
No Flame CZE, I didn't say that. I'm saying don't try to change things you can't. You could have just reminded him of the request section. If you don't want to do him a skin then just don't do it.

Last edited by 5tag, Thu 6 May 2010, 15:35.

Quote from AMB :

Read the whole thread and you'll see why he posted there, after he posted here, because I directed him to the correct forum section, idiot.

Watch you fingers, dude! I was just posting the link to the thread because there some people seemed to get what he was trying to say.

Quote from AndRand :

or enlarging the car to cover motion blur of the edges.

*lol* There sure is a more professional way of having a clean blur. How do you explain the rear wing anyways then?

Quote from badboy2 :

not sure about them, but when i make one they dont seam to work well.

Um, O.K. ...

Quote from matijapkc :

Thanks to Boekanier for the greatest render ever. Cheers mate!

Oh *lol* at the rims and the skin.

Migz

Quote from AudiBG :

lulz

Quote from skiper :

Has specially made the sated colours, I did not pursue realism.
Simply artsreen

Well here in your screenshot, in general pass of the white channel, unnecessary noise by the car, any reflexions except asphalt,
The effect of presence of water in general is not present, also absolutely absurd effect of a rain, and on its light surfaces it is visible is better than on dark, on water drops on a miscellaneous light is reflected in distance from objects??))At such focus blur absolutely so looks

Long live google translator...

I'll never understand why posting private skins is allowed in the finished skins thread.

I would prefer to forbid it. Also a solution would be that every post (forced that every post contains a skin) could have a rating or comments system so people could get feedback but the thread would not be spammed. I fear though this is not within the limits of vB.

I haven't seen it happen here more than two times I guess, though walkways are not very common, traffic lights are.

Quote from jibber :

They are the same. Are you blind?

I don't know but honestly these (that were seen on the wikimedia picture) don't look like those (that you have).

Quote from Matrixi :

Those are the same original (projector) lights.

The same as yours? No way, really. :nol2:

Quote from Matrixi :

They are the original ones. I suppose you are talking about these. Those are the non-projector lights which the non GT-R models came with. The N1 GT-R also came with the non-projector lights, though they're slightly different due to the grille, and very rare (and expensive) to come by!

Some people just buy the non GT-R lights and mod them to fit the grille, but I prefer the projectors since they have more lighting power and the light pattern can be fixed for right hand traffic.

Don't know if this is an N1 GT-R but I meant these head lights. It's sad because they would look a lot better I think.

Quote from Matrixi :

pics

May I ask if these head lights are the stock ones. I don't know if there was some face lift on the R32 but I know there's been GT-R's with other - better looking lights.

Quote from Tomba(FIN) :

Even with the max AA in LFS (8X) you can't get smooth lines..
The direction the tree is blurred is correct so can't see why you don't like it.
Nice one Lynce!

I have LFS myself too so I know what antialiasing looks like in LFS. Lynce will agree that he sharpened the car or increased contrast and as a consequence stairstepping is increased too.

Regarding the blur I could have said that I would have used radial blur (not the spinning effect, the zooming one) instead of motion blur but to the eye the only difference it will really make is that tree which for me looks out of perspective.

Quote from 65D :

It was just totally mistake to suggest. I'm dickhead - I can't drive that corner and I can't suggest anything properly.

:grumpy:

Oh you poor little thing.

Quote from Lynce :

Dedicated to the Latvian Community. My best wishes.

Cheers.

The antialiasing is a bit low and I'm not too happy about the direction that tree is blurred in but everything else is just close to perfect. I love the lighting on this edit very much. :thumb3d: