Don't worry, Angry - I'll take your word on that one!
Sure. I do agree with the point you're making. Bringing someone onto the show that is appealing to your target audience (on whatever level) makes good sense.
However, I said I thought it was a bit harsh, because I felt that wasn't all they had done.
Based upon this week's show:
1. Having an anchor presenter added a certain professionalism and structure to the show.
2. Based on her performance this week, Jessica (IMO) already presents on a par with the guys (in terms of delivery and dialogue). Maybe she'll become even better - who knows?
3. Adding a new face (any new face) to the show, provides variety in presentation.
4. Maybe the guys needed another presenter to take care of the general stuff, so they can spend more time on reviewing and interviewing? (OK, I just pulled that one out of my arse too. )
So I think ISR have probably killed two (or more) birds with one stone here.
Once all the 'nudge-nudge, wink-wink' jokes are done and dusted, I think a female presenter provides a good contrast to the guys.
In this week's episode, I thought having Jessica fronting the show and taking care of all the general/intro/competition stuff with the guys doing the technical/review stuff worked well. It's traditional for news shows have an anchor man (or in this case, woman ) with other people doing the in-depth stuff.
Kudos to Darin and Shaun for not insisting on being front and centre the whole time and allowing another presenter in to help.
Yeah, things are loosening up a bit now and TBH I thought Jessica presented well this week.
I feel that the leg option might interfere somewhat with left foot braking, so that's a non-starter for me and while I really like the stand/levitation device, it has to be said that the broom solution has a certain simple elegance, so it's a) for me.
So allow a short delay (although in practical terms, leaving it too long could lead to unnecessary pile-ups) and then only allow a reset/rejoin once the coast is clear.
Would it be possible to have some kind of 'pull back' facility for the MRT?
The reason is that the MRT is well suited to the shorter South City circuits and sometimes a fairly innocuous spin will leave you with the nose of the car pressed up against a barrier.
I appreciate that they have bike engines and therefore cannot have a reverse gear, but it would be nice to maybe allow a marshall to pull the car backwards away from the barrier and would do away with the need to allow resets to overcome this problem.
Perhaps it could be an option, in case people prefer not to use it.
This was the Golden Age of F1 racing for me. Gritty, all-mechanical and very dangerous.
I still watch the movie 'Grand Prix' (1966) every now and then just to see the cars and the racing footage, although they actually used F3 cars dressed up to look like F1 cars for the movie. The footage used in the longer shots were extracts from real F1 races though.
Apparently, director John Frankenheimer refused to film the cars moving slowly, then speed the film up, so all the footage in this film is the real deal.
A genuine museum piece of the era.
For those who haven't seen it, here's a clip from the movie:
I think you need to submit your server (host) details to the InSim Relay Service.
Go to LFS Remote and click on the question mark (?) in the bottom right hand corner of the page. It explains it there with a link to the Insim Relay page on LFS World.