Lap/Time/Location on track: 12.40 T5?
Session: Feature
Cars involved: 66 & 30
Description of the incident: Notice throttle and steering position of 66 all the way through the incident
Also I believe worth mentioning is the 2 lots of contact between 66 & 94 (especially considering the language used at the end by 66 directed at 94)
Time : First incident starts 33:40. Second 40:34
Edit2: after watching end again, it appears I was wrong about who the language was aimed at.
Nightshift, if you put the word "forum" in front of the word community then I would agree with you.
I speak to a lot of sim racers who just don't bother with this forum any more due to the way it seems to have gone (This is what I am lead to believe. I have not been around long enough to know the forum any different to how it is now).
Just because someone is not active on the forum doesn't mean they are still not part of the LFS community.
In conclusion, I don't think community position is as bad as this forum makes it look at times.
Team Affiliation : Ironhorse Racing
Driver Real Name (First AND Last) : Nick McKerron
Driver LFS Licence Name : menantoll
Desired Car Number (Between 02 and 999, LFSCART Series entrants have first right to a number. 2 and 02 are considered the same, as well as 10 and 010, both for examples.) : 7
Country Code (using ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 country codes ONLY) : GBR
Gender : Male
Opinions are fine and are mostly welcomed from what I can see. The problem is though that so many opinions are peddled as fact which they clearly aren't. This is when they are not made so welcome.
No it hasn't. It's been 1 year and 10 months (ish) since the last major update and only 1 year and 4 months since the delayed major patch. Neither of which is 2 years and certainly not "over 2 years". Lets not let real hard facts get in the way of your whining though eh?
So he's 4 months late on delivering big things! If you have given up waiting that is your choice but to state that you can't believe others are still waiting, like they are wrong to do so, is just silly. Some people have faith in Scawens words and some don't. Get over it.
I see a post where someone is moaning about someone moaning about someone moaning about a post where someone is moaning.
I'm going to have to get my ironing board out.
E: and the post that was quoted in the second generation moan wasn't actually a moan, he was asking about other games as has been suggested time and time again.
E^2: damn now I've had a moan. I'll need a special steam generator Iron to sort this one out
I've just been practicing pit stops and now I have a question.
How strict are you going to be on pit entry?
Time can be gained and lost here with wheels on and off the grass. Will we have to keep all wheels within the yellow lines or will it be the usual 2 wheels?
My question was more rhetorical. 2% in an xfg is not going make a noticible difference to the speed of the xfg.
A real question. When do we get official results and a league table?
My own little story.
In the feature race I lost out to my own ignorance of how to switch off damage repair in pits. I started in 2nd place on the grid but I was side swiped in turn one and although I managed to maintain 2nd place by the end of the second lap, I lost a couple places waiting for a minor damage repair during my mandatory pit stop. Then a couple more as people who didn't stop on 2nd lap managed to pit and stay ahead of me. I then had a bit of a battle with the guy who came 3rd for about 10 laps losing in the end as I braked too late for the hairpin and also had a few more pass me.
Was great fun and I look forward to next week's race.
I put the right amount in for 10 laps during practice, based on the estimate in the garage, and after 9 laps saw that it wasn't enough so I upped it by a couple of % for the race.
How much extra weight is a couple of % of fuel anyway?
Yes you did say can afford, I didn't pick up on that point.
So do you agree that some people can't afford ALL the things neccessary to use LFS online, yet they are still able to play LFS online? Is price a valid argument for these people?
It's all a moot point anyway. Can you seriously expect the devs to thin out their already small market by stopping anyone without a wheel from being able to use LFS?
You said "EVERYONE, yes EVERYONE". I was purely pointing out that you were wrong. EVERYONE would include "Freeloaders"
Did I mention that John was previously in a horrific plane accident which left him mentally scarred for life, unable to work? Would you still call him a freeloader now?
Yes I'm making up an extreme here but EVERYONE includes all the extremes.
I still stand by my earlier statement. The price argument can be very valid to a lot of people.
His PC was donated to him
TVE purchased LFS for him
His neighbour has wireless and is kind enough to let him use it
After paying his utility bills, his rent and his food bills and his court ordered debts he has nothing left.
Should he not eat for a week to buy a wheel?
He can't afford a 360 controller either as they are even more expensive.
Anyone who says that, in my opinion, has no clue about real life(Edit:being the wider, whole world, real life, not the small localised one you are living). There are many reasons why someone may not be able to afford a wheel. No matter how cheap they seem to be to you.
Dude, it was a sarcastic comment. The next line "and the 60% of users dont gona play lfs anymore " should have told you that. She doesn't want only wheel to be allowed at all!
It seems the point I was trying to make went way over your head. I'll say no more.
Edit: An after thought. Maybe it was your post that went over my head. You were actually calling him a retard not his language? Wow you really are nice arn't you? I thought more of you when I thought you were having a go at his writing.
Also if it did download from the server when you pressed 2, how come you can still veiw the replay by viewing temp.mpr after being kicked, banned or just losing connection?