The Zolder 24hours is at the end of the month so surely we would have a winmer announced soon.
My bad, Da Costa is with Arden.
Must of been last year.
Must of been last year.
Well yes, but they still got him to STR.
Besides ISR are probably not the best team, Ricciardo struggled with them in 2011 but he was almost able to win the title with Tech 1 the year before.
Although it could be argued it was because he was doing F1 and F3.5 at the same time in the last half, the season was dominated by the Carlins of Wickens and Vergne.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
I would say that its very likely he would.
I think thats for console, I would expect much larger for PC.
My latest Car, Mercedes CLK 280: http://postimg.org/image/6cp9alcnn/
http://postimg.org/image/gquohkms3/
http://postimg.org/image/gquohkms3/
Yeah what happened with this?
I would probably be careful what you say though, this topic was on the first page when I typed racingstars.tv on google, maybe make a new topic name.
I would probably be careful what you say though, this topic was on the first page when I typed racingstars.tv on google, maybe make a new topic name.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
Since there is 3 main characters how will the money work, like will each character have seperate money accounts or will all 3 be combined into one?
After 2002 I think it was they changed the regs and the cars where much closer, I used to watch V8s back then and when you consider where Ambrose was compared to the rest of the Fords, it was quite incredible, SBR was a Midfield team when he joined and as a rookie instantly was a front runner.
2005 I think he had a slump in the last half when he announced he was going to Nascar and well thats how I think he lost to Ingall but there is no doubt in my mind at the time he was the best driver in the series, but it wasn't anything like how Whincup is over the field today.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
If Loeb were to beat Muller that would make him probably the most complete driver in history.
I watch it now and then, its pretty damn crazy stuff.
When alot of people say conservative here, do they mean social or economically or both?
I mean I have a conservative economic view point, but socially im very liberal.
I mean I have a conservative economic view point, but socially im very liberal.
Senna Left Mclaren because they were too slow.
Both major parties of most 1st world governments do the same thing, its their image that is different.
For all the left the left does there is an equalivent right keeping it centre and all the right a right does there is an equalivent left.
But me as someone who I consider my self a Social left Economically right, i see all Governemnts going in the left direction Socially and Economically but they implament left social action in a authatarion way.
Governments love power, afterall they are humans and if you allow them to have it by god they will take as much as they can.
For all the left the left does there is an equalivent right keeping it centre and all the right a right does there is an equalivent left.
But me as someone who I consider my self a Social left Economically right, i see all Governemnts going in the left direction Socially and Economically but they implament left social action in a authatarion way.
Governments love power, afterall they are humans and if you allow them to have it by god they will take as much as they can.
Mercedes Reveals F1 engine sound: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/109133
Sounds better then the Renault engine but without the fart sound on gear shifts which I kinda liked.
Sounds better then the Renault engine but without the fart sound on gear shifts which I kinda liked.
At the end of the day Humans are the Government and contrary to popular belief the public and the government are not the same thing.
You can look at it from a far angle and say this is what happened then this happened but unless you can explain the entire complex scienario in which the problem was actually created your still talking out of your you know what.
You can look at it from a far angle and say this is what happened then this happened but unless you can explain the entire complex scienario in which the problem was actually created your still talking out of your you know what.
they added a feature that allowed you to save the ghost of anyone on the leader board, thats the best way to best your time.
The problem being that when the government sells off industries they get monopolized and prices soar.
There is not exactly a simple answer to it all.
But all those industries you have mentioned are minuscule in the scale of the entire economy, and although i haven't looked it up, could possibly be done to pay for problems that where much more serious to the economy at the given time.
I would of passed if Australia was included.
Last I checked I was 4th Australian(but if i bothered to practise it, I reckon 2nd would of been easily possible).
Last I checked I was 4th Australian(but if i bothered to practise it, I reckon 2nd would of been easily possible).
watch the race its in your face the entire time.
I never said it was the better tyre in 1997, but its was the better tyre in the hotter conditions at that race.
Also first report I found on the race and its all over it: http://en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/story/86569.html
Also notice how they talk about the setup being crucial, another factor in hungry not being a drivers track although it does highlight that Hill had a knack for knowing the right setup for the track.
Last edited by Mustafur, .
The Arrows did soo well because the Bridgestone Tyre advantage over Goodyear there was massive, Hill did do quite well in qualifying but in the end he was gifted the hope of winning when Frenzen had to retire.
usually happens when one stays in the pit for over 20 seconds.
Last year at the US GP would be the most obvious i can think of.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG