The online racing simulator
Searching in All forums
(641 results)
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Yeah, drift + TC
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
In these server records it is faster then RB4... and only bit slower then XRT. Something wrong there. Or just 'records' are crap
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Hey, look at the records: XRG is 8 seconds faster than XFG?!

Is it THAT XRG with 140hp? How is it possible?
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
WOW great event!!!

I really don't like those comments that bmw sucks etc. Even if you don't like these cars, keep it for your mind. Posting such things in this topic is just sick jealous bullshit

Add some info please about setups, times (maybe better not...), anything

Even if he can't drive it, he can play with bunch electronics in car in garage.

Wonder if his father is pleasing him to drive a little... "ok daddy, but don't press 'M' button!"
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Ultimate test, in case if you don't know the answer: "Am I complete idiot? Yo!"

Just get on the roof of your house, and do step-by-step after instructors. They have completed this test positive, so they are profesionalist

If you are not 100% sure that you are dumb, please stop the test and get down safely, to think about it.

Yo yo! Let's start the TEST!
Setup: tire specs
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Some features in LFS are being discussed to be banned, due to non-realism (too many setup options for road cars etc.).
I thought about something which is easy and realistic: ability to change rims/tires specs in setup.
I mean ability too change every point of '225/50 R16' (like in lfstweak) plus some styles of rims for personal taste.

To avoid stupid wheels dimensions it could be restricted in-game or by server side. Well, for now differences could be small and for sure it will bring up some monkey exploits used by hotlappers... But, if we got many DIFFERENT tracks it will be useful.
Now only little changes would help, and I'm sure we will set different sized tires for SO/RallyX/WE.

What do you think?

ps. if in this moment you are going to request 24" blink blink chrome spinnerz, do not repost
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
There where two things why I didn't laugh:

1. It looked like he was really going to fall down.

2. Stupid women ignoring his pain and laughing.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
7. Lewers lenght that multiplies overall braking strengh?
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Quote from squidhead :pasibrzuch
seeing your avatar pains me

It hurts me too... but let's believe it's photoshoped.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Please stop doing movies. It is not about your age, you just can't make movies and you don't no how to do it. It is so crap there are no words for it.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Quote from Aquilifer :Miata is not in the same league as UF1. I have nothing against Miata, but beetle is in the same league as UF1.

"Miata a legend"? Lol... okay maybe the requirements to get a legend status are bit lower in your neighbourhood (no offence), but no way you can talk it in the same day as Mini or Beetle.

UF1 is slowest car in LFS, and would be one of the slowest in real, so where is the point to suggest sporty cabrio (by Sketchyrollin564) as competitor for UF1?
It is absurd because: number_of_laps = n_times_mazda_passes_uf1
My gues is that Sketchy lost a street race with mx-5 guy

I said its 'a kind of legend'. It was the best small cabrio for many years, so I think in cabrio world it can an icon.
For sure it is not in my neighbourhood. There are 2 mx-5, one was my friends, which was ricer all the way (and people reactions where: he looks like gay in that car), and second is used as 'L' training car for driving licesne practise
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
This topic is only spamish hidden attack of miata hater.

Are there too many miata-ricers in us or what? It's nice car and kind of legend
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Quote from JJ72 :I do want to know pasibrzuch what is your source of those figures?

It was amateur homemade looking at hot G force in lfs. It's not accurate at all.

After Bobs post, it can be more weight transfer in UFR that causes superb reverse acceleration.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
More weight = more load on wheel = more grip

Now, it's your turn to list inertia and of-center force in corners, if we are going to post half true posts
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
So why low pressure tires gives you more grip while low pressure gives you only trouble + wider tires effect?

Both cars have enough torque to spin tires from beginning to the end of first gear, aren't they?

FZR has just better center of gravity. It's longer, wider, not so tall.

More weight gives more grip.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
No, there's still something wrong.

Some data(driver incar):
__________________________UFR (on reverse)____FZR
weight dist. on powered wheels __62,6% ___________63,4%
power/weight ratio ___________272hp/ton _______425hp/ton
peak G force (race_s, R3) ______~1,28G ___________~1,25G


FZR has also 2x wider tires...

Another weirdos are:
- UF1 has 10sec 0-100km/h
- there's no need to control throttle. you go perfect with lot of spinning. as well with road tires, as with slicks.
Last edited by pasibrzuch, .
Rubbered track
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
It was mentioned several times to implement rubbered race-line, which gives more grip.
It's of course good idea, but... does rubbered track really increase grip ratio? I found in old (1986) racing book in chapter about braking something interesting.

Author says, that in first laps the grip in brake-zone is great, but in the end of the race there is thin coat of 'rubber sand' from tires, which greatly decreases grip in such places (where tires are wearing out).

Anybody know whats going on? Is it about different ingredients in tires from 20 years past?
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Damn hackers. It seems like while creating an account, he has wrote your username too!
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
You are right! 'Throttle cut on upshift' cuts throttle on downshift too.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
I think car manufacturer sets up a low fuel warning so high, not because some customers don't have fuel station for 100km in any direction, but for car health.

If you have 98% air in fuel tank, a water from air can be 'exported' (?) when ambient temperature is changing. It is not good for engine to run on water. Also fuel pomp may heat-up and breake. So cunning engineers put a pressure on you to fuel a tank earlier, than it is needed for simple driving another kilometres.
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Quote from chrislow :It's just i didn't think the uf1000 had a computer in it's engine

Even in fiat uno from '97 is computer. It gets the data (to know how much fuel he should drink) from throttle position, throttle opening speed, lambda, intake air temp, water temp, engine revs...
If some sensors fail, computer gets the default data for certain situation from his 'data tables'.
I think cars got computers in engines with single point injection, but not sure.
Last edited by pasibrzuch, .
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
It's pretty possible. Only woman can talk nothing in this quantities!
Accroding to surname, it can be Eva Green
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
because they are aliens. savage aliens from the savage future!
Last edited by pasibrzuch, .
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
I'm for simple version:

Violet - +1 lap ahead
Blue - ahead
Green - you
Orange - behind
Red - +1 lap behind
Grey - aliens ...I mean AI's


after 15 changes it's not that simple?
pasibrzuch
S3 licensed
Quote from jamesrowe :Hehehehe Pedal Power

In Poland 'pedal' is used also as ugly nick for gay 'Pedal Power' lol, don't put it on t-shirt

Anyway, I saw a test of some cars OBC about avarage fuel consumption.
They got what OBC says and compared to real numbers from their own math.
Nearly all cars said that av. fuel cons. was higher then IR by some 0,x litres.
Only VW lied for over 1litre/100km down in OBC (!) It was Golf IV if I remember. If other data about them is also true as this, it's clear why many people still think it's best compact car
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG