On Wednesday 7th December, we're hosting a 23 lap race with at Aston Grand Touring (AS6) the Formula XR (FOX). There will be 15 minutes of hardcore qualifying (no shift+p/s allowed). Interested? Please see the event thread.
Also, if someone uploads the exact same set as someone else, could they get a message that this is the case?
For example, Pete and I both uploaded thisset. Could there be a message above "Car & Name" saying "This set is identical to another set and will not be displayed publicly"?
Maybe not as long of a track as last time, since there wasn't a full grid of teams. Perhaps something around a 90-110 second lap time would keep it more interesting.
Sorry about that spin, at the time I felt like you were moving to the left to force me out of the pass, so I just stayed in it and you spun. Looking back on it its not what I thought at the time, so sorry about that.
You're expected to show up between 20:00 CET and 20:15 CET for the briefing which happens at 20:15 CET. Qualifying starts at 20:30 CET. That's why they're different.
The reason is because setupgrid/setupfield have been really really helpful sites for LFS for years, but now one is gone and one isn't getting updated with new tracks.
Obviously some people can rip hotlap sets, but not everyone can, and there's no reliable way to get race sets for combos you haven't driven, even with the mpr extractor. That only works if you have an mpr to start with, while there's gonna be hotlaps for every combo.
There's also the obvious reason, just because something can be done that way doesn't mean Victor can't provide a legitimate way to share setups. Some people don't have the ability to rip sets, some people don't want to, so this is clearly the best way to do it.
I hope you were drunk when you posted that, because it's a really stupid question if I'm honest.
Also a few suggestions that may have been overlooked:
The ability to mark sets with more than one classification. For example many UF1/XFG/XRG sets can be used for qual/sprint/endurance without any changes.
Daniel said that if a set is named "XFG_BL1_Nilex.set" or "XFG_BL1 Nilex.set" it should be marked as a BL1 set automatically. I think that's a pretty good idea.
But if a set is called XFG_BL1Race.set it shouldn't set as BL1R (or BL1) because it's slightly ambiguous even though it's obviously a BL1 Race set, not a BL1R ace set