No, I have a problem with total bell ends, as you should be well aware by now.
I'm sure there are some nice coppers but that one sounds like a total bell end.
Demonstrating that they are employable I suppose.
Compared to dead people, starving people have NEVER HAD IT SO GOOD. They should stop MOANING about STARVING and be GRATEFUL they aren't DEAD.
No. He's legally allowed to carry it at all times. The moment he decides to poke it into a human he comes under the same laws as anybody else.
I grew up around a lot of Sikhs (a small town bordering on Dewsbury) but I don't remember discussing kirpan sharpness with anyone. I was just shocked that they all had them.
Is it some sort of weird game controller?
You don't understand the law. It's perfectly legal for that man to be carrying a kirpan, it's a requirement of his faith that he carries one at all times in case it needs to be used to protect the innocent against tyranny.
The law explicitly allows Sikhs to carry it. AT ALL TIMES. Please read and comprehend.
Midfielders. They can be dangerous, even the ones from liberal countries - look at Nigel De Jong.
I'm sorry but the kirpan is a weapon and is intended as such, that's the whole point of it. Sikhs are required to carry it for exactly the sort of purpose that this guy is displaying his.
I'm surprised it's allowed to be honest, it's a massive concession to a minority religion in the UK.
They appear to be chanting 'EDL'. So presumably they're there to enjoy a fight with whoever blunders into Eltham with dark skin. **** all to do with a 'fight back'.
What's so bad about having an argument?
I'm getting a sneaking suspicion that our habitual BBC public funding complainer doesn't actually contribute any tax to the economy at all.
So are you a registered sole trader or some kind of limited liability organisation?
Incidentally Alan what is it that you do for a living?
Over 10% unemployment in Tottenham. I remember unemployment being around that level nationally when I was about to leave school in 1990 and most people where I lived had little expectation of finding work. It's as bad if not worse now, and we've got another sympathetic tory government to ease the pain...
And how do you explain the fact that these people all seem to live in the same places? And would you go on to postulate that the lack of opportunity in those areas is a symptom of the malaise of the locals rather than a cause, or would that too myopic and preposterous even for you?
People need to be protected certainly. Perhaps if most of the police budget wasn't spent on surveillance hardware instead of police officers they might be doing a better job of that.
Ah the classic land-of-opportunity belief, where the poor must simply be lazy.
Clearly they feel differently. Wasn't it Turkish-owned businesses they were securing? I would expect business owners to have a different experience to jobless youth, wouldn't you?
And they don't usually get any opportunities, so they're taking it with both hands. Personally, if I found a wallet in the street I would try to find the owner and return it, but if I was on benefits or in a shit minimum wage job I might just take the money. Yeah it's illegal and opportunistic, but if you can't get along any other way then maybe that's just what you do. And when you compare it to the way the so-called respectable members of society operate (most business owners with their tax calculations, MPs with their expenses, etc.) it's no different.
I think when you get large groups of people, particularly when they belong to minority ethnic groups, who are mostly living in poverty and feel that they don't have any political power, stuff like this is going to happen. Clearly these people don't feel any sense of ownership of their own neighbourhoods or they wouldn't be causing destruction like this. It's an us-and-them thing, and if people feel that way then the only approach that will improve the situation is to try to include those people in wider society to a greater extent.
I'm not saying they shouldn't all get nicked for it, mind.
I'm not saying they shouldn't all get nicked for it, mind.
Same way Jean Charles De Menezes deserved to be exterminated on the tube for jumping the turnstiles (oh that turned out to be a lie) and wearing a long dark coat (oh that was a lie too) and looking shifty and stuff. Well he had brown-ish skin didn't he, and besides all the CCTV went missing so what are you going to do.
The same way MPs used parliamentary expenses to steal tens of thousands of pounds each from the public purse? Oh no that was different because they're rich, so only a couple of scapegoats get prosecuted for it and the rest just continue as they were.
Liverpool have certainly spent a lot. Maybe if Adam does a good job supplying Carroll they'll have some success, but they must be gutted they spent so much on him now Barton is available for nothing. They've got better depth to the squad now but I don't see any eleven being a match for United.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG