Apparently, i am the only one "moaning", so stop crying. You like it - great for you.
That its just as boring. The only existing thing is that its new.
@Flame, as long as its downhill, its great? After all, all downhill is the same downhill.. Point is, not everything was bad.
did you watch the video? Im not saying the old was perfect. It definitely needed tweaks on the 08/15 turns, but this is a completely different track. It doesnt even look like the same place.
Im sorry, but this isnt Westhill anymore! Why not give it a new name? This looks more like a new Kyoto (which is not necessarily a bad thing) than anything with some Aston boringness. There are a few kinks that are nice, like the last turn, but other than that, its not an improvement. What happened to the downhill left (or uphill right in reverse, which was great fun climbing up with the Lx6). Its not any more challenging than the old, which was the whole point of this venture, no? The do-or-die chicane is gone? That was one of the fun things about the track (besides being an actual challenge).
Last edited by JazzOn, .
Well, can you blame them? It's quite audacious what they try, but if the consumers buy into the hype, its hard to blame them for trying.
Talking about microstransaction coming to boxed games, did you know there are skins in CS:GO (I believe it was), that go around for $100, or soemthing like this?
Talking about microstransaction coming to boxed games, did you know there are skins in CS:GO (I believe it was), that go around for $100, or soemthing like this?
Are you implying that LFS is a bad game or that you think skin rstriction and sorts / FTP model would be better for LFS? How is this relevant? FTP model for this type of game, is an absolut no-go.
Last edited by JazzOn, .
Right back at ya.
This is a thread about Westhill, and people voiced their opinion and arguments. The case was closed and now you (and other annoying people) come in again make a big deal out of it.
Just deal with it. It's just complaining for the sake of it, isn't it?
Really? I'd guess kids always want the new stuff.
What kids (or immature people) definitely do is get spiteful when someone argues against them.
However, case closed by Scawen.
not more, but not less.
How hard is that to understand? Nobody complains about new stuff, just that the old stuff doesn't need to be removed.
How old are you? Absolutely nobody said that.
That's a good point. It can only be in the interest of the artist (and new players), to showcase how much a track evolved. For people that only know the newest Blackwood, it's a pretty nice track, awesome even, but all the ones that have driven the old one, can really appreciate how much changed (for better or worse).
Regarding the possibilities of reality, well, its a video game and being able to do things you can't in reality, is one of its greatest appeals. Why put on artificial limitation. if one doesn't want to drive it, then don't, but leaving it in does absolutely no harm. If it was possible i nreality, people would do it, no question about it. In a video game/virtual world, you can. So why not?
@Flame, different physics, physics that breath new life in an old track. Its a win-win
Last edited by JazzOn, .
But everybody experienced the old version and know the in and outs. Again, its not a bad track and has some good corners - thats a fact. The reason people are bored is because it looks so empty, and frankly, pretty bad overall. People would be just as excited about the old Westhill if it only had the make up done and added new layouts so slower cars aren't flat out every corner. Of course people will like the new one; its finally a complete track and adjusted for the new tyres. At this point everybody is happy (obviously) about anything that is something new, even if its just some trees around Westhill and 'new' tarmac.
+1 @Sinanju
Already been asked and the answer was you have to use an older version for that. Eric also stated that it was designed with the old physics. Sad to say, but the old version is no more, and i am kinda afraid he changed some of the good corners. Its not like it was a bad track and there is nothing wrong with 'quick' chicanes. It just was very sparse in regards to the surrounding. It wouldn't have hurt to have a few more layouts incorporated into the map as well.
If only anyone had said a word in the last 6 (7?) years.
FYI, its not Scawen who does the tracks, so i think you're talking to the wrong person. Eric talks, so maybe you should talk to him?
(not to mention that it was explained many times what the plans are and why it is how it is now)
You're kinda late 
People suggested, at least mod support, for years and just recently Scavier started actively working on S3.
As you noted, LFS is still one of the best simulations (not necessarily games) and the potential is massive. It would be the stupidest thing on earth to just make it open source. Plus, DLC is a widely accepted model already, so its not too much of a stretch to think that it (Nordschleife) will come eventually, whether they buy the laser data or just the whole track as it is.
Then again, as seen over at AC, proper mod support gets you very far. Its "free" content for your game and acts like free advertisement/promo. It brings people that want quantity and people that get most of their enjoyment from creating something.
PS: your english seems perfectly fine ^^
PSS: I believe AC does have tyre deformation though, just not visible. I could be totally wrong, but think to have read it somewhere
People suggested, at least mod support, for years and just recently Scavier started actively working on S3.As you noted, LFS is still one of the best simulations (not necessarily games) and the potential is massive. It would be the stupidest thing on earth to just make it open source. Plus, DLC is a widely accepted model already, so its not too much of a stretch to think that it (Nordschleife) will come eventually, whether they buy the laser data or just the whole track as it is.
Then again, as seen over at AC, proper mod support gets you very far. Its "free" content for your game and acts like free advertisement/promo. It brings people that want quantity and people that get most of their enjoyment from creating something.
PS: your english seems perfectly fine ^^
PSS: I believe AC does have tyre deformation though, just not visible. I could be totally wrong, but think to have read it somewhere
Last edited by JazzOn, .
Or it could put them even more off. LFS has good mouse steering, which is good enough to get the idea. Its probably safe to assume if someone doesnt understand what "racing simulation" means, he definitely doesnt knwo what a force feedback wheel is.
+1 Maybe call it Westhill Classic.
I like some of the changes but some not so much. For one, the flawless tarmac in comparison to the patchy/old concrete type. Thats not really an improvement and rather boring even just to look at. I'd love to see maybe old road parts still existent. Like Blackwood with old and new tarmac sections. This type of detail helps a lot with immersion of the speed.
The new chicane is interesting, but the old one was a lot of fun too. I've seen a lot of people fly off there, so difficulty was never an issue yet super fun if you nailed it
The sweeping up/downhill is now like a copy of an Aston turn
Last edited by JazzOn, .
You can always just ask them, you know https://www.lfs.net/?page=mailus
I imagine its also something a programer takes soem pride in. I'm not too bothered by it, but then again, If nobody is online or you (I really) just suck and only can follow the field either way, it's nice to still have some fun racing.
Thats fine, I don't have feelings anyway.
(this smile is just a fassade and the result from years of practise)Input lag and tearing only is an issue if you're above the refresh rate of your monitor.
I have to correct myself the typo, I have to U2312HM too not the H and can confirm the slightly lightness on the corners Wiskey mentioned, but really only noticed it in the beginning and forgot about it after a few days. You'd only notice it when looking for it
However, why not egt something really cheap in the meantime until money flows better? What about this? https://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?t=80928
or ebay.
If you wait a bit and g-sync get sorted out, it's definitely something to consider.
I have to correct myself the typo, I have to U2312HM too not the H and can confirm the slightly lightness on the corners Wiskey mentioned, but really only noticed it in the beginning and forgot about it after a few days. You'd only notice it when looking for it
However, why not egt something really cheap in the meantime until money flows better? What about this? https://www.lfsforum.net/showthread.php?t=80928
or ebay.
If you wait a bit and g-sync get sorted out, it's definitely something to consider.
Because that would be a copy+paste anyway since you didn't actually understand it?
I can recommend the Dell U2312H, which is an IPS panel with still good response times and a heavy foot keeping the whole thing very stable. It also has a pivot funtion and can be raised accordingly. I have it for at least 2 years or something and runnning 24/7
Not too long ago i've read a test about the latest LG IPS series for a fair price of ~150 or something, but can't remember the name.
E: this is where i got my recomendation from: http://www.prad.de/en/monitore ... /review-dell-u2312hm.html
Not too long ago i've read a test about the latest LG IPS series for a fair price of ~150 or something, but can't remember the name.
E: this is where i got my recomendation from: http://www.prad.de/en/monitore ... /review-dell-u2312hm.html
Last edited by JazzOn, .
kerb/track/slide are the "canned" effects. They were implemented for people who like to feel the car rumble in their wheel and such. So lowering that gets rid of them.
Here's the suggsted wheel settings http://www.assettocorsa.net/fo ... ups-ac-early-access.1439/
Here's the suggsted wheel settings http://www.assettocorsa.net/fo ... ups-ac-early-access.1439/
This is something i feel prominent after Shotglass mentioned some issues and now it really is annoying. Its kinda rough compared to the other forces.
note: again don't know how realistic this is...
Can someone confirm this?
in the advanced controller options, and they're set to 30 or something on default (i think)
But nevermind, i've just tried it and it seems to just add vibration.
Last edited by JazzOn, .
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG