This i believe is the only really universal part.
Westhill has two enormous straights, you don't need to leave your line.
Maybe i've got it wrong, you're asking why you can't specify the exact same port as LFS is listening on as the port for responses in the ISI packet when you run everything on the same machine? Because it would make LFS send packets to itself.
Just like MonkOnHotTinRoof says, using 0 will make LFS respond to the originating port of the incoming packet, which is of course completely different from LFS' listening port.
Radeon 9550SE, no change in fps.
You're sending the ISC before the ISI?
Master server works fine for me (U20), LFSWorld graphs show no disruptions. A single search provides ~15 threads dealing with this.
I'm pretty sure the Aston Club race is the best LFS video i've ever seen.
You can do quite alot with flash actionscript i think.
Yes, a good way would be to decide what you want to do, choose a language for the attempt and read the manual for that language.
It's definitely not the code missing some else's, the fact that PHP gets stuck suggests some kind of lengthy timeout for fopen, maybe related to using an url to open the file, but it still shouldn't consume any noticeable amount of cpu.
Why do you want to open the file through an url? Why do you want to manually read an ascii text file as binary? Why are you not using the apache php module?
Why do you want to open the file through an url? Why do you want to manually read an ascii text file as binary? Why are you not using the apache php module?
<?php
file = file_get_contents(path/to/file);
?>
Everything seems to work.
Maybe the "OK" button could say "Play" (replay screen) :hide:
Maybe the "OK" button could say "Play" (replay screen) :hide:
Yup, it's that easy. It's weird how LFS Tweak stops working between patches though, even when the files are the same.
A script is a computer program, "making" a script is essentially the same as writing a computer program. The difference between "programming" (C++) and "scripting" (PHP) is that the script is not compiled to machine code (.exe), it's instead read and run by another program, the script interpreter. Writing something simple in a scripting language is often easier then writing it in a compiled language, compiled languages usually require the programmer to handle memory management and datatypes, where scripting languages often convert types automatically and handles all memory stuff for you, at the cost of speed.
Dygear's McLaren script is written in PHP, http://www.php.net/
Introductory PHP tutorial, only covers web stuff: http://www.php.net/tut.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_programming_language
To "make a script" in 5 seconds with notepad:
Save as hello.bat, double-click the file, you've "made a script".
Dygear's McLaren script is written in PHP, http://www.php.net/
Introductory PHP tutorial, only covers web stuff: http://www.php.net/tut.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_programming_language
To "make a script" in 5 seconds with notepad:
echo Hello!
pauseSave as hello.bat, double-click the file, you've "made a script".
In my opinion, finding the vulnerability itself was the helping bit. "Finding out" that you can cheat / hack / modify a program is nothing new, but this particular exploit seems like quite a nasty multiplayer design problem which should really be looked into.
I guess what you're saying is the remedy suggested by n3o follows the rootkit type design and isn't something you'd like on your pc? This sounds much too extreme for LFS, i don't think it would be an apparent option for the devs.
Allocate all the standard LFS colors, print each character in the name separately with the current color.
colors = array (
0 = imagecolorallocate( .. black )
1 = .. red
..
)
name = str_split(name)
currentcolor = default color
x = start x
y = start y
for (i = 0; i<=strlen(name); i++)
if (name[i] == "^" && preg_match("/[0-8]/", name[i+1])) {
currentcolor =& colors[i+1]
i += 2
}
imagestring(image, font, x, y, name[i], currentcolor)
x += char spacing x
}
How about pitstops being disabled until the car has passed atleast one split "checkpoint" after leaving the garage.
They're in NLP and MCI for sure, i've done alot of development with only the AI as my beta testers.
Note the fact that he knew absolutely nothing about LFS, Scawen could be John Programmer at floor 14 in building C of company X.
Perhaps i am, i don't feel like this is such a big deal tbh, LFS is still in alpha and i'm not surprised these kinds of exploits are still around. I'm sure it'll be fixed and all will be back to normal.
I've got a similar analogy, not really a reply to your post, but here goes.
Which situation would make you prioritize the issue most, a friend calling you saying your car is unlocked but he'll protect it until you've got time, or reading that your car is unlocked in the morning paper? Not saying it's a good way of making sure an issue gets priority, but its widely used and probably works. I'm not into anything like this so i couldn't say how i'd do it.
Angered peoples, you do realize that testing a piece of software for vulnerabilities is basically the only way of finding and fixing them? There's a reason for exploit testing software such as Nessus being available.
Would you rather have n3o finding this sort of stuff and keeping it for himself? would be alot "smarter" to keep this a secret and then get to the top of the MHR by cheating as little as possible.
You also do realize that even if n3o is a skilled programmer, he's probably not the greatest programming genius that ever lived and hasn't spent four years working day and night on this, meaning this sort of exploit could probably be (quite easily) found by other people too, fixing it would be very beneficial for LFS.
In my opinion, n3o has helped Scawen find a serious exploit, meaning Scawen had time to work on the updated track selection menu instead of looking for obscure exploits.
Would you rather have n3o finding this sort of stuff and keeping it for himself? would be alot "smarter" to keep this a secret and then get to the top of the MHR by cheating as little as possible.
You also do realize that even if n3o is a skilled programmer, he's probably not the greatest programming genius that ever lived and hasn't spent four years working day and night on this, meaning this sort of exploit could probably be (quite easily) found by other people too, fixing it would be very beneficial for LFS.
In my opinion, n3o has helped Scawen find a serious exploit, meaning Scawen had time to work on the updated track selection menu instead of looking for obscure exploits.
I pitstopped.
Seems any amount of engine damage gets fixed instantaneously.
I drove each car using [default] or [hard track] down the drag strip until hitting high revs in top gear (or running out of drag strip), dropped into 1st and held the car straight, after letting the car slow down i tried to drive back to the start and gathered some "damage ratings", totaled meaning the car could no longer move under its own power.
- UF1 - totaled
- XFG - heavy
- XRG - very light
- RB4 - very heavy
- FXO - extreme
- XRT - moderate+
- LX4 - moderate
- LX6 - light
- RAC - very light
- FZ5 - ~none
- UFR - heavy
- XFR - heavy
- MRT - very light
- FOX - light
- FO8 - very light
- BF1 - ~none
- FXR - totaled
- XRR - totaled
- FZR - ~none
Engine fix (twice!) in 0 seconds, online / in race.
Last edited by filur, .
Not at all, i simply pointed out that it would probably be highly prioritized if made public.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
Making it public means it really needs to be fixed, and if it gets fixed that's not a bad thing.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG