Using a codec heavy on CPU to record from a game heavy on CPU does not equal speed.
The more important point might be there are other lossless codecs with proper standards available, and a good balance between quality and recording speed? using a codec that eats cpu whilst recording from lfs which also eats cpu into something that's not lossless is none of those things.
Uncompressed avi equals lossless quality without stitching 14,000 BMP's together.
It's actually a terrible host, 21kb/s here, about 2,5% of my bandwidth.
I'd guess that's what he meant, replace "as" with "to".
-1, MJPEG is a lossy format even at 100% quality, very cpu-heavy and there's no single mjpeg standard.
+1
Maybe someone should make a DFP sticky.
Try draft quality? Solid ~20-30 fps on my 2.4g celeron.
About the video, good advertisement for the fraps website, shaky fps, pretty neat otherwise.
I can do a Swedish one..
.. so i did.
* updated for v0.6 *
.. so i did.
* updated for v0.6 *
Last edited by filur, .
Just need to mention my netgear router/fw has an average uptime of about 30 years, firewalled throughput inside the LAN (100mbit) at over 8mb/s which was atleast pretty good when i got it, and a very decent set of basic routing features.
You probably need to switch the output to the correct standard, PAL, NTSC etc.
I've got a thingie in the works which i guess would almost fit your definition of a 'generic' app, it's basically a program which connects and handles all the insim stuff such as packet (de)construction, and feeds insim packets to whichever plugins are loaded, without any plugins it doesn't really do anything.
It's written in pure PHP, if you know C++, PHP should be very simple to pick up.
It's written in pure PHP, if you know C++, PHP should be very simple to pick up.
The easiest way i'd say is NetLimiter, if you can hide it well enough so teh nephews can't turn it off you'd have your network bandwidth-shaped in 10 minutes.
Other then that, maybe a black box running some of this stuff.
Other then that, maybe a black box running some of this stuff.
Pool 3 has that beat, only two out of fifteen made it to the finish.
Massive lag wipeout, our host counted 11 disconnections i think. (in one go).
Sounds really great, since i haven't figured out at all who i should allow to add bans.
Wouldn't say it would make SamH's stuff obsolete in any way tho, automating the bans is very simple, but the system design is something else.
.. on topic
I really like the idea of a distributed ban system, but i can't say i'm interested in this one. I'd like zero discussion, decisions or choices, where a ban is a ban until it expires, automatically put in effect on any new additions to the database. Could go with different 'levels of subscription' or something, but not individual review of each case for every subscriber.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG