weird : 911 gt3 996 phase 1 was 225/40/R18 and 285/30/R18 for 360hp (like FZ50), while the GT3 phase 2 was 235/40/R18 and 295/30/R18 with 381hp ... where are the missing 21hp ?
And by the way : why FZ50 ?
Higher resolution cars wil be a must after all the efforts been done over the tracks ! But, after
indeed bloom is very nice !
But yes, the lack of antialiasing or the lack of pixels used for the car are noticeable on screenshot.
But yes, the lack of antialiasing or the lack of pixels used for the car are noticeable on screenshot.
Indeed 
. It will be brilliant and clearly properly done as usual 
. Good luck and continue !
. It will be brilliant and clearly properly done as usual . Good luck and continue !isn't e60 from 2005 ? (with the damned v10 ^^ )
5 series were E39 in 2003 iirc
edit : some research later, e60 has begun in august 2003 ... shame on me !
Last edited by Flotch, .
indeed an enhancement sounds welcome
For my 1989 Polo Fancy, if you switch on the lights, you have a manually adjustable green lighting ...
In the 2011 c-class, everything is automatic ... sounds adaptative but I am not really looking to it. I will pay attention this night, but I fear after 7pm French time it will be dark and by a lot, so no variation to observe.
edit : From memory in my wife's 308 from 2008, I do not think it is adpating : only a brightness level to set manually.
edit 2 : the GPS have a night mode aswell for vws in case it displays the gps...
NB : what I observe : working on brightness adaptation in modern cars while no modern cars are currently available can mean only one thing ...
Last edited by Flotch, .
we are simply talking about S3 contents :
* UK track : rockingham
* still the two unknwon tracks based in China and US
* electric cars to come
* UK track : rockingham
* still the two unknwon tracks based in China and US
* electric cars to come
of course, I hope there is no-one still not understanding this
.What is less obvious is the role of each one regarding what is called global warming, and the price fixed for each to be allowed to continue doing the shit.
For example, currently in France, cars are responsible (
) of global warming, and so we must pay more and more after time ... but "more and more" is not deterrent of course, it is just a way to get some more taxes paid, and on the other side nothing is done regarding : trucks, boats, airplanes, factories (or not so much)... Aswell, nuclear plants are emitting almost zero CO2 (green energy award ? ).Diesel engines are said for years and years (and still, even if some cities are planning to forbid them ... NB : side effect, my old VW polo 1.05L petrol from 1989 is to be forbidden soon in some French cities, but my Mercedes C63 with the 6.2L will be welcome for a long time to come !! ) to less pollute because of the weight of CO2 measured (to not even speak about VW and Renault cheating the thing
) to sell more model with this technology (French ...) and still keep an unbanlance of taxes making cars with diesel engines : - almost as expensive as petrol ones, but more efficient, more performant, etc ...
- registration cost reduced
- less running cost for people who are using them a lot
- been ultra used in cities because a diesel engine doing idle is consumming less (no need to repeat, but less pollution, everyone knows that
)Reducing pollution all over the world is indeed a matter of the numerous people all around the Earth : clearly it is a problem. The way they want to live (lots of meats, lots of everything...), but "us", rich countries people, who are we to explain to China, India, etc ... how do they need to live for the benefits of us (all), while we have created this way of living, and enjoyed it regarding comfort, etc ... ?
But now, when us, rich countries people, are explaining that we must do less and less at our level : why not, but for instance France is less than 1% of the whole population on Earth ==> we can assume it will have a negligible impact on the world ==> governements will still use the taxes and continue their business instead of fixing anything because globally why :
- reducing consumption (less taxes ...)
- invest more and take the risk to loose some things
and in the end having our beloved neightbours on Earth doing the exact opposite because they do not care ? short term money is more attractive.
A side note, in our stupid way of living with lots of CO2 emitted, forrests are better than ever (the ones not yet destroyed
), and stopping suddenly the pollution emitted in the air would make the temperature to rise incredibely fast (probably short term, but anyway the consequences could be quite disturbing I let you imagine) 
... I am not so optimistic 
always doubt is a key. And take note that the large consensus you are talking about has the solution : citizens have to pay some more taxes. Problem solved.
Some centuries ago, a large consensus was that Earth being flat. Lots of scientists were explaining this with Mathematical formulas.
at this rate, the test version to come will be called LFS 2.0 ... even if the 1.0 has not yet been used
Amen
you are talking about vws, aren’t you
More seriously, have we specified that we are ready for any kind of test patch ? even demo content only related ?
To me, what you described Scawen is more 'consumer society' than simply 'capitalism'. And indeed you are right and free to live the life you choose. But in my opinion, and as Aleksandr_124rus is writting, it is somewhere because of of this economic growth that we, "people from rich countries", are able to choose our way to live our lives (i.e. : in some countries, people working 16h per day to 'survive' may have less opportunities than us to choose a "better life") ... Nothing is fully black and white
Anyway, enjoy developping LFS !
Anyway, enjoy developping LFS !
Dare to post the updated one to make the comparison ?
Very nice and excited to see the night ! I made some tests in ACC by night and for sure it is the kind of feature LFS must have !
And for the future, add the fresh air impact on engine/grip ..., then rain, snow ...
layouts and 40 slots with a demo ? in the time it was needed to have at least an S1 licence for that
there could have been a parallel test patch version with not all the tracks available
for sure this damn roundabout not accessible in "x" version is frustating . Everyone would like to drift it since it exists . Anyway, seeing what Aston, Autocross and Kyoto look like on the screenshots, South City is going to be sexy !!! (I remember having read somewhere that it is Eric’s preferred track)
. Everyone would like to drift it since it exists . Anyway, seeing what Aston, Autocross and Kyoto look like on the screenshots, South City is going to be sexy !!! (I remember having read somewhere that it is Eric’s preferred track)FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG