I do not know for you, but I would have to turn the wheel with my feet, accelerate with the nose, and brake with my hands, I am pretty sure I would succeed quickly to run the thing properly.
But anyway, yes, I admit that I find that you can be a bit too quick with mouse/keyboard.
Thanks for the progress report
back to business with tire physics ? ^^
Agree on the entertaining part : LFS is pure fun because of its brilliant feeling. I learned so many things on how to handle cars that it will remain the reference for me ! I wish you to get even further when the tire physics will be ready for us
(you know : rain, and more )Welcome on board guys ! US in force, PerryRhodan, are you sure you are from England ? 
I read about this this week aswell
I am still a bit suspicious about the technology, but in the end, it goes for the way that more and more people never worrying about their tires' pressure.
I am still a bit suspicious about the technology, but in the end, it goes for the way that more and more people never worrying about their tires' pressure.
Looks like Mint can be use for iRacing.
https://www.mintprepaid.com/use
=> if someone use iRacing, 10€ is for how long ? few hours ? maybe giving you a voucher against is easy 
https://www.mintprepaid.com/use
=> if someone use iRacing, 10€ is for how long ? few hours ?
maybe giving you a voucher against is easy Great
The relatively low polygon cars will suffer from all this sumptuousness when done 
The relatively low polygon cars will suffer from all this sumptuousness when done
I am more excited to wait for an LFS progress report (even when there is "no progress report") than the release of AC competizione
... even if it is a very nice simulation. Actually, I would need GT3 cars in LFS to make a fair comparison
... even if it is a very nice simulation. Actually, I would need GT3 cars in LFS to make a fair comparison
still tomorrow ... or it will be next month ...
LOL, that will sounds like a "must-provide" list if some would find it
I hope Eric is well progressing with the placements of street lights among the tracks to brighten the night
, and I do really hope we see the tire physics coming with the graphic updates : it is THE thing that really matters to me ... Getting mad with locked diff 
I hope Eric is well progressing with the placements of street lights among the tracks to brighten the night
, and I do really hope we see the tire physics coming with the graphic updates : it is THE thing that really matters to me ... Getting mad with locked diff glad for them and for you if they decide to come here 
I share your point on the lawyer, unless being a friend, it may be very very expensive, to not speak about the stress and time to spend following the thing ... If the people came here, back or fresh, by themselves, it is a lot better for you guys
I share your point on the lawyer, unless being a friend, it may be very very expensive, to not speak about the stress and time to spend following the thing ... If the people came here, back or fresh, by themselves, it is a lot better for you guys
Fern Bay for the win !
PM for Eric : I was looking to some videos of Dover raceway in Jamaica : the global feeling of the track (old tarmac, etc...) would apply perfectly for Fern Bay 2.0
PM for Eric : I was looking to some videos of Dover raceway in Jamaica : the global feeling of the track (old tarmac, etc...) would apply perfectly for Fern Bay 2.0
I hope they succeed in delivering these graphical updates and tire physics evolution to have something brilliant as we can be sure.
And in a not so huge amount of time !
Aim is they can breath a little before doing more funny things, like new contents to develop matching their taste
i.e. : Rally pack for the win !
And in a not so huge amount of time !
Aim is they can breath a little before doing more funny things, like new contents to develop matching their taste
i.e. : Rally pack for the win !
You're right. It is just a theory I tried to share and explain 
:* In November's report, we can read "1 track needed to be finished, and 2 tracks needed to be 'done'". On a total of 5 tracks which weren't shown fully, we can conclude that 2 were done or if not, almost done.
* Today, we have seen 3 of these tracks. The last one is almost finished 5 months later, so we can assume it was not the one that was on the stage to be finished in November, and so one of the two tracks to be done. And we can suppose aswell that the track to be finished has probably been 'finished'.
* as a conclusion, if Kyoto Ring was one of these two tracks, maybe only one is remaining to be done. And so either South City or Fern Bay is 'done' ("at least").
I was reading some older progress reports, and get reminded this sentence in November's one :
Since we get :
- Autocross in December
- Westhill in January
- Kyoto Ring in April, but it is "not yet finished"
This means that by November, the remaining tracks were those 3 + South City and Fern Bay.
We can assume that Kyoto Ring was not the track to finish, unless it could have taken 5 months (why not in the end...) and it is "not yet finished" ... Kyoto would be part of the 2 tracks to finish in November.
=> Currently I would tend to suppose that there is still one track not finished (finish is maybe not appropriate, let's say operational) maximum while South City and Fern Bay still get secretly hidden ... Get ready for next progress report ?
Since we get :
- Autocross in December
- Westhill in January
- Kyoto Ring in April, but it is "not yet finished"
This means that by November, the remaining tracks were those 3 + South City and Fern Bay.
We can assume that Kyoto Ring was not the track to finish, unless it could have taken 5 months (why not in the end...) and it is "not yet finished" ... Kyoto would be part of the 2 tracks to finish in November.
=> Currently I would tend to suppose that there is still one track not finished (finish is maybe not appropriate, let's say operational) maximum
while South City and Fern Bay still get secretly hidden ... Get ready for next progress report ?
Last edited by Flotch, .
It has been rejected in current state, not rejected without legit reasons.
clearly, after the upcoming graphical update, Eric has already 2 new tracks to ’finish’, for S3 content obviously/most probably.
indeed, and it will be a modern FWD with a very low rpm turbo action (max torque between 1700 and 5000rpm, almost a diesel), ESP that cannot be deactivated, huge tire width as usual (235! , modern FWD ....) ...
Clearly great for close racing if interested.
A kind of 130i to fight against would be nice
Clearly great for close racing if interested.
A kind of 130i to fight against would be nice
indeed they are present since a long time, but as there is a high chance the new physics may be released among the graphic update, this is clearly giving the feeling that we may see the VW coming with the upcoming release ^^
To be honest, I suppose we may face first some serious test patch sessions for Eric and Scawen's pleasure ( ) before we actually see the VWS in the official patch ...
To be honest, I suppose we may face first some serious test patch sessions for Eric and Scawen's pleasure (
) before we actually see the VWS in the official patch ...very nice
You should have sent the /cp values to Eric to make the snapshots now
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG