Sounds nice to me. But regarding the hotlap tables, if the new tires for some of the cars are 5mm thinner, I suppose the times done previously by the faster guys won't be reached in this new version (if that matters).
NB: classic FZR being quicker than XRR is only due to people using autoclutch (or worse 😁), as if you want using the FZR with the clutch, good luck trying to catch a good/medium driver with an XRR 😉
Last edited by Scawen, .
Reason : removed long quote
knobbly tires speaking : it is indeed better for the XRR
(it is still madness)
GJ
NB : still the warning for wrong the tire choice appearing with automatic load of the track when you have selected some Rx tires on ... a Rx track ... if by chance you can find where it is coming from
I have just tested XRR (with Rx/Drift setting) with autoclutch, and the clutch is engaged for a time really really quick, far quicker than for the FZR for example ... is that intentional ?
it is the classic drawback of the current tire physics model : even on a straight line, the downforce make the tires to almost heat up (what is actually the case with the Rx/Drift config with R2 tires, more than the classic wider tires that may loose few °c on long straights) ... so less power is obvioulsy helping regarding this aspect ...
But rallycross speaking, the GTR would need 100hp more to match the real counterparts (not sure the tires would follow)
You are right, it is indeed 265. Where I do not follow you is that you think that heavier car needs less tire width ... it is not the case for cars in general, why would drift cars need less tire width when heavier ? or more generally, why would lighter cars need bigger tires ? seems weird.
I have no talent for drifting, but by playing a bit with XRR and FZR, I would say the FZR is better when clutch kicking due to the bigger engine ... on this, the XRR is clearly less interesting, but handling speaking I find it quite nice due to the weight balance : whatever the tire width (but again, not a specialist)
Indeed. I would simply call them something like RACE (for Rx/Drift option) and GTR for the classic version we know for a longtime.
The reason is the weight balance : more weight at the rear means you need more tire width to have a better natural balance.
On the paper for XRR, having 275mm rear tires for a 1100kg car with 50/50 weight balance does not seem 'little', even if the power is almost reaching 500hp.
wow, I did some laps in the FXR, and it is better feeling by far. More agility, more responsive, clearly better (almost matching the laptimes of U18 by 0.2/0.3s)
I did my test on BL3 with knobbly tires
I tried the XRR in the same config ... omg, that is a beast ! Impossible to not spinout the thing
It is just great ! I have finally manage to get under 57 in Blackwood rallycross (do not laugh, I am old now ) ! This was clearly a must for LFS : a performant car for rallycross tracks, hope more people will enjoy this part of LFS
Thank you Scawen !
NB : Eric, do not forget to add a joker lap layout included on those tracks !!!
I did a quick test (I was going mad with FXR on blackwood rallycross : amen to that patch ), and saw that : XFR and UFR are not included ... They are designed to be rallycross machines !
Could it be possible to display these numbers in the tires tab ? It is always nice to see these cars' parts specifications when playing in the setup menu.
this is the purpose in this incompatible patch among the increased lock and multiplayer :
- road tires available for racecars.
- Rallycross tires available for GTR cars.