time will tell, as for separating physics and graphics ...
But having a global delivery would be awsome ^^
Good luck guys !
NB : hope the rain is planned and implementable in the future
. As seeing how beautiful are the sun reflection on Blackwood's roads snapshots, I just dream of the same with rain ^^
But having a global delivery would be awsome ^^
Good luck guys !
NB : hope the rain is planned and implementable in the future
. As seeing how beautiful are the sun reflection on Blackwood's roads snapshots, I just dream of the same with rain ^^
approoved
would you be kind to share some hints for the next track to be shown ?
Last edited by Flotch, .
addendum : just try the "storm" (heavy heavy rain), it is very fun 
Awful to put the pedal to the metal Very nice !!! Maybe a bit too icy, but fun !
edit : made a test with medium rain : it's very nice ^^ . Storm is full of water and the tires are not going well into water
Awful to put the pedal to the metal Very nice !!! Maybe a bit too icy, but fun !edit : made a test with medium rain : it's very nice ^^ . Storm is full of water and the tires are not going well into water
Last edited by Flotch, .
yes, that is crazy ! Total fail on this aspect !
Graphics are quite nice (environment is very eye candy with plenty of mooving stuffs
that is pretty nice), but the road surface is looking ... not so great imo... Sounds are pretty nice to hear (like braking even it feels a bit not as natural as RL). Handling ... I do not know. Some aspects are nice, some are still very disturbing (like you can loose the control of the car and spin it at 15kmph, if you go offroad the car is slowing down gently ...)
50-50 for me ...
ACC may not be attractive at all : kind of redundant on AC on many aspects, and you know you will have to pay again and face most probably to bunches of DLC (if interested) ...
I think I will buy it ... but not so excited, just to see the graphics part and how the handling feels (one car/one track if I read correctly for now)
I think I will buy it ... but not so excited, just to see the graphics part and how the handling feels (one car/one track if I read correctly for now)
https://facebook.com/Assetto.Corsa/photos/pb.305504559475869.-2207520000.1536691679./2703520716340896/?type=3&theater
pricing for ACC, the sooner the cheaper :
25€ if you buy it tomorrow
35€ if you wait until the 14th of November
45€ if you have waited until the 16th of January ...
Probably less then 25€ if you wait for more than one year
pricing for ACC, the sooner the cheaper :
25€ if you buy it tomorrow
35€ if you wait until the 14th of November
45€ if you have waited until the 16th of January ...
Probably less then 25€ if you wait for more than one year
Indeed but there is currently some troubles on this page : many screenshots are not available at my level ^^ , while they were some times ago
edit : and you post things like this, and instantenously it is fixed
edit : and you post things like this, and instantenously it is fixed
They posted some great news on how the product will evoluate 2 weeks ago, stating they are working full time on this ... and you assume they have lost interest on it ?
I think it is a proof they are really into it ! Other features are of course a matter of time, but if you read Scawen's posts, he is definitely involved in doing further great things, but as said Hakseli90 : they are only 2 !!!
They plan to show other tracks in a few weeks, each track to update takes several weeks ... every unit is in weeks now, that is pleasant !! Be confident !!!
Glad for you that you find a great way to understand LFS !
Note that understeer and oversteer are kind of headache most of the time. A concrete exemple : when your car understeers, it can introduce some unpredictible oversteer just right after (like an icy part of the road the front wheels are touching, making the car to not turn as expected, so you steer a bit more, then the front wheel leave the icy part, but the rear one touch it => guess what happens ) ... but what you remind is the big oversteer in the end => while the good way would be fixing the understeer to avoid the massive oversteer, the first reaction is to increase the stiffness of the front ARB that may increase the understeer behaviour, and in the end introduces a massive oversteer that you are not fixing
This simply to say that setupping is sometimes not easy at all.
About accessing the websites, yes they are very optimized by someone knowing how to do the thing properly .I am sure he will be pleased reading this 
Enjoy LFS !!!!
Note that understeer and oversteer are kind of headache most of the time. A concrete exemple : when your car understeers, it can introduce some unpredictible oversteer just right after (like an icy part of the road the front wheels are touching, making the car to not turn as expected, so you steer a bit more, then the front wheel leave the icy part, but the rear one touch it => guess what happens
) ... but what you remind is the big oversteer in the end => while the good way would be fixing the understeer to avoid the massive oversteer, the first reaction is to increase the stiffness of the front ARB that may increase the understeer behaviour, and in the end introduces a massive oversteer that you are not fixing This simply to say that setupping is sometimes not easy at all.
About accessing the websites, yes they are very optimized by someone knowing how to do the thing properly
.I am sure he will be pleased reading this Enjoy LFS
!!!!sexier, I like it !
this is nice
But you do not use the Aston snapshot ????
But you do not use the Aston snapshot ????
First : upgrade of physics to 1KHz
Then, it will be possible to have lap time including ms, and so Drag Racing as hotlap could be interesting for the straights fan
Then, it will be possible to have lap time including ms, and so Drag Racing as hotlap could be interesting for the straights fan
come on, it has not been seen to avoid massive heart attacks beetween the readers.
Find some 599xx footage for example
Kyoto First
[/Donald mode]
[/Donald mode]
turbal engine ...
Look for some italian V12, you will hear it is better
Look for some italian V12, you will hear it is better
Agree.
To ask something about the wonderful Blackwood we can see, Eric, can you plan to add a way to have a joker lap implemented for the rallycross configurations ? Like a chicane close to the pit exit or one on the right of the long straight of Blackwood GP in normal way (aim was to not design something differently, otherwise a gravel part with an hairpin would be nice of course ). I am not asking to implement the joker lap feature, but at least to have something built in the track for an implementation of the joker lap in the future when Scawen will have some free time to spend
To ask something about the wonderful Blackwood we can see, Eric, can you plan to add a way to have a joker lap implemented for the rallycross configurations ? Like a chicane close to the pit exit or one on the right of the long straight of Blackwood GP in normal way (aim was to not design something differently, otherwise a gravel part with an hairpin would be nice of course
). I am not asking to implement the joker lap feature, but at least to have something built in the track for an implementation of the joker lap in the future when Scawen will have some free time to spend Maybe Eric had some other better ideas aswell, as curently we know nothing else than it will be beautiful
But indeed, it is like South City : plenty of configurations are already dreamable in the current state !
But indeed, it is like South City : plenty of configurations are already dreamable in the current state !
Yeah
And if you want to fix the numbers (rpm, torque, power, weight) that are a bit different than what we have currently in LFS, it would be awsome
And if you want to fix the numbers (rpm, torque, power, weight) that are a bit different than what we have currently in LFS, it would be awsome
it is like when you get the interior going to green when you touch a green area of the road, or the arm of the driver going through the window/roof of the LX6 ... : maybe not related to track graphics but cars ... I admit I do not know ...
A bit off topic, while I see the Aston subject raised, I was dreaming of a new corner for Aston Grand Touring (in aim to differentiate its layout a bit more than the GP one) : it would be to use the part of the last corner of Club as per the attachment ...
NB : the trucks parked in Blackwood are very sexy, I wonder if we will them move one day arond the tracks
A bit off topic, while I see the Aston subject raised, I was dreaming of a new corner for Aston Grand Touring (in aim to differentiate its layout a bit more than the GP one) : it would be to use the part of the last corner of Club as per the attachment ...
NB : the trucks parked in Blackwood are very sexy, I wonder if we will them move one day arond the tracks
No shader object with id : fShader2d
When clicking on the car appearing on the top right, I get the following error message (using chrome) :
www.lfs.net indicates :
No shader object with id : fShader2d
When clicking ok, the car is correctly appearing.
www.lfs.net indicates :
No shader object with id : fShader2d
When clicking ok, the car is correctly appearing.
For the gear/rpm to use, on a track with long straights (car reaching almost its top speed) I am for using max power delivered by the engine at the end of the straights.
In this particular configuration (mini oval), top speed is not so interesting, so I was looking at a good compromise beetween maximum power when cornering to be able to maintain the wished speed, and no gear change (if you upshift and downshift once per straight/corner, this means 4 changes per lap, so 300 gear changes during the race to compare to ... none => none is better
And simply by speaking about data, corners are taken at 170kmph, and top speed is less than 190kmph ... so accelerations are only for 20kmph, the few hp difference by being a bit high rpm at the end is not really a problem.
In this particular configuration (mini oval), top speed is not so interesting, so I was looking at a good compromise beetween maximum power when cornering to be able to maintain the wished speed, and no gear change (if you upshift and downshift once per straight/corner, this means 4 changes per lap, so 300 gear changes during the race to compare to ... none => none is better
And simply by speaking about data, corners are taken at 170kmph, and top speed is less than 190kmph ... so accelerations are only for 20kmph, the few hp difference by being a bit high rpm at the end is not really a problem.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG