This question is not meant to offend. It should have been asked to mrodgers and I, but its the default question that should be asked when someone claims to have authority on any subject.
What cars have you driven and "pushed?"
As mentioned before the light steering is more noticeable in front wheel drive cars. However the aforementioned effect is clearly noticeable if the front tires are locked in most cars.
Actually the FF is from the front end geometry only, LFS doesn't translate the tire friction/forces IIRC. The reason why the steering is really light when stopped is because tire friction is not being translated.
I agree, the steering FFB should not lighten for any reason, unless the wheels are off the ground, or past maximum slip angle while on ice.
Last edited by legoflamb, .
Reason : New information
That would be amazing! I really hope you are right, the DSG is the only AT transmission worth simulating. Assuming they didn't put auto blip back in LFS for GC, it seams like they might have.
That is when left foot braking is the most fun. rly it is
Not directed at you DeadWolfBones.
I don't see a reason to be completely dependent on a single foot for braking especially if you haven't put in the effort and try to use either. That is just removing an option you can or could have used.
Generally I use either depending on the car and situation/corner. However, iff I have to down shift (with H-shift), I'll use my right for the initial brake-in, and then switch to my left foot in the same corner, depending on the corner. Two corners, I switch feet in, that I can think of right now, are the long sweeper at South City that comes off the main straight, and the sweeper at Aston Grand Touring where you have a quick left then the right hand sweeper following immediately after.
There is a major contrasting difference in your statement. With FCV no one has to spend any extra money, however someone is not forced to spend 300 USD on the G25 for a decent wheel, nor do you have to buy a wheel.
Your statement is a fallacy, those two situations are incomparable. However you could say "might as well force everyone to use locked differentials.
Yeah I did the same thing when I was practicing left foot braking, that's why I like to have less power assist because you can tell if the pads have made contact with the rotor. Where as if you don't realize you are slightly riding the brakes it may seem as though you have a loss in power.
Lol same but you have to be careful, I once got to the point where I was having too much fun, overused the brakes, and couldn't get any brake boost, like you I was on some canyon roads. Losing brake boost there is really scary and is not something pleasant to experience.
That was my fault, I should have got the context of the conversation and realized what we were talking about.
Back on topic:
I haven't reduced the the brake boost, I just like how the brakes feel when the vacuum has been depleted.
From what I have read, you'll probably want to replace the whole vacuum assembly with a hydroboost system for safety reasons (loosing vacuum when you really need it), however you can get a bigger master cylinder. Using a bigger master cylinder should require more force through the pedal but it will also make the pedal travel shorter.
It is something I have also been wanting to do since I have owned the car, but haven't gotten around to doing.
Oh I'm sure I have more brake force than necessary, or wise for that matter.
Reduce boost? Now why would you want to do that? What car do you drive at the track? Do you have a Mazda Speed Miata? I am not sure how to reduce boost. I think it has something to do with the waste-gate.
Sorry I have a Miata with no ABS, its a really light car and can lock up at 60 to 80 MPH. Personally, I like really strong brakes with very low power assist.
It makes for more sensitive brake control, which makes driving more fun.
The statement on the official website that I was referring to was "whilst a lower pressure means the tyre heats up slower".
The quote was not talking about what air pressures work best with what tires, nor was the optimal situation mentioned in the aforementioned paragraph. The paragraph states how tires perform "in basic terms."
I agree that the lower the tire pressure, longer time is needed for optimal tire pressure to be reached.
However, I am no expert in this field. If new information comes across my path, from an expert in said field, or data that can be trusted to be true, proving the contrary to what I have read elsewhere, I will agree with the statement quoted from The Official Formula 1 interview.
I'm fairly certain that what you mention does happen in LFS, however like you said it might not be or might be too dramatic. There is really only one way to tell, and that would be to try using lower tire pressures in real life and compare. Even then you can't be completely sure.
Last edited by legoflamb, .
Reason : additional info
How is simulating a modern automatic transmission too expensive to build into LFS? As for the added value to the sim, that depends on what kind of modern automatic gearbox.
IMO, the most important update damage wise is the suspension and wheel(rim) damage. The reason for this is to force people to be more concerned about running over curbs at 90mph (namely FB Green) and worry if their suspension will collapse the first time rather than 50 laps of hitting the same curbs.
Not only would hitting high curbs at high speed damage the suspension, but would also damage the steering column, the toe and camber, the dampers, the rims, etc.
At the moment(from now and the next patch) IMO, parts falling off is not that necessary compared to these things.
Admin stands for administrator, and administrator kinda means manager. So someone with Admin Rights has the rights to manage a server. To get those rights you:
1. create a server
or
2. meet people that run a server, get to know them well enough to let you manage their server
That is what that is all about, I am just solidifying what obsolum had to say.
Both of those are semi-automatic however the DSG does allow for an automatic mode.
If the aforementioned transmission were simulated, it would just be like the viscous clutch differential in that it would be used by few and not really benefit in the development of lfs. I agree with Woz