The specified string is not in the form required for an e-mail address.
I would look at what is going in these lines:
1/31/2024 3:45:15 PM -> Var not defined on file: ".\default\.\includes\.\myInc.lpr" at line #14
1/31/2024 3:45:15 PM -> Var not defined on file: ".\default\.\includes\.\myInc.lpr" at line #15
No, I didn't even have to look when your lfs forum was created. It's about your attitude and how you approach new stuff. Again, nothing bad about it, it's just how things are with youngsters nowdays.
I like very much your approach to scanning the interior of a car. Even like this, there are quite a lot of details. It gives quite a good head start with all of the proportions done right and quickly.
New tire physics is in the making as we speak, it should eliminate all imperfections related with how tires behave. We don't know release date yet, but we hope for something this year.
To give a flavour of mods, one should put one mod in each demo section. One open wheeler like skippy, one bike like gp125, one fwd car and one rwd car. This would attract more players to lfs for sure and it would payoff all of the Scawens efforts invested in mod support.
Best marketing allways rely on addiction.
edit. sorry, I almost forgot, also one awd car for rally fans.
All settings you mentioned were allright. One thing that comes to my mind, it's probably due to car setups you used, mostly they are made by mouse drivers and they have a very strong return to center force due to incorrectly set caster. You fill find that on most setups it is maxed out at 6deg, so try lowering it down to 5.5deg or lower untill it feels good. I normaly set 5.7deg or even 0.1-0.2deg lower for some high downforce cars and this gives a very nice and balanced feel in most cars that allow setting caster.
Such a simple question, yet answer is extremely complex and quite unknown to us. I don't think even Scawen himself would know how to answer it at this point
What I'm trying to say is that it's not about gear or belt system, It's about the motor which makes the wheel feel smooth or not. Brushless motor is allways much smoother, because there are no brushess that cause friction, plus motor poles on DC brusshed motor are much stronger than on any brushless.
Why do you think all car transmission systems use helical gears and not belts and pulleys? Helical gears are much smoother than a timing belt and pulley system. The only downside with any gears is a tiny bit of a backlash they have, compared with belt system where there isn't any backlash.
I would have to dissagree with you guys. I like the feel of XFG and FOX more on G29, but everything else on T300 felt like a XRG, heavy and dumped due to belts. Overall T300 has better ffb, due to it's brushless motor which gives it smothness and less friction and somewhat better resolution of motor driver circuit, but it's still quite far from what DD wheels bring to the table.
On G29, generaly stiff cars felt better due to more quick reaction of helical gear system. If G29 had a brushless motor and a 3 phase motor driver from T300 it would be comparable, but like this it's not even fair to compare them. Both have pros and cons and it's about what suits different people more.
Yes, digital resolution of ffb is just a part of the story. The actual motor and mechanism are the other part. They all play together to result in the final ffb feel. If the motor is crapy and meshanism is very heavy and with quite some friction, it will eat away and dampen ffb details. This is the limitation in all non-direct drive wheels.
Bottom line, both G29, T300 and similair are good enough ffb wheels for the guys who want to feel ffb for the first time and who can aford it (by money and free time).