I believe that any context in which that was correct would require me to come back from the dead, wouldn't it? Otherwise, you'd just say "RiseAM died on the 5th of Maytober"
But you can say "The doctors confirmed that he had died before they arrived on the scene from asphyxiation from laughter."
I don't see anyone being disrespectful in here? Don't get me wrong, it's sad that someone died, it usually is. But I see no need to be overly sad when I was only barely aware of him in real life. It's not like he had a profound effect on me with his acting, though I'm sure he was a very good actor.
I actually think it would be far more of an insult to suddenly pretend that I cared a whole lot about him, when I was only barely aware of him in real life. Death is just a thing, it happens to everyone at some point.
You can't "had died" because it is an action that is final. Once he is dead, he is not likely to change that status, barring a zombie apocalypse. It's "David has died."
For a condition in the past, that does not currently exist, you could say something like "David had an injury, but now he's better."
Indeed. The action of dying is in the past, whereas the condition of dying is eternal. That's the difference that makes it correct to say "had died" in this instance..
Can't we just make a single "someone marginally famous that you might recognize if you were paying attention has died" thread? And use that from now on?
You should also look to see if they have any other similar teams. I know Georgia Tech had an offroad team also, and a team that competed in Grassroots Motorsports $200x challenges... they had a Miata with a Lexus v8 shoehorned into it, which was pretty awesome.
Still, you'd think the lower leagues would invite them pretty quickly, that with that many fans behind them they'd be able to cut a deal. Because even after the fallout of all the glory-hunters, there still have to have a bunch of people who have spent their entire lifes as a part of the club, and couldn't bear to see it die off completely. And I wager that would make them very attractive to the lower leagues on several levels.
I can't see either Rangers or Celtic completely ceasing to exist in some form. Even if they are shut down completely, you know a new club will spring up in the exact same place, with the exact same fans, an almost identical name, and wearing the same colors. And where there are large numbers of fans, there is money. Would be a different club structure, but it will still be Rangers, since the persona of teams is tied into the fanbase and area so much.
haha, drive through on a SCCA weekend... you're silly
At worst, he would have gotten a post race penalty after the stewards talked to both drivers and possibly the corner workers. But I wouldn't think there is any video besides whatever they may have inside their cars. Usually, nothing happens at all.
You have to remember that everyone else out there, besides Dennis' group, are amateurs. The weekend as a whole doesn't have enough money behind it to pay for a proper steward review system with cameras like they would use in F1 or IndyCar or ALMS etc. So they basically rely on trusting each other, and giving each other a bit more room than they need to. Which means the pro races can be absolute carnage, no review system, damage doesn't come directly out of the driver's pocket, and they race hard.