One of the iRacing guys posted the Week 13 schedule today, and said the Corvette would be racing at Mosport and the Indy Car will be at Indy "when the build comes out" during Week 13 so we'll be able to drive them some time next week.
It was really just terrible marketing in the first place. They made the subscriptions look more expensive than they needed to be, which isn't exactly the smartest thing to do considering your sim is ALREADY priced higher than everything else out there. The new pricing model is what they should have used from the beginning.
I can't help but laugh when I see people on the iRacing forum talking about how great of a deal the old way was with the "free iRacing credits" they were getting. I guess they don't realize they were just loaning iRacing money. Then when you point that out to them, you get called out for whining. Actually, any time you ever say anything negative over there you're a whiner, even if all you're doing is stating the facts.
And the new schedule is out. Corvette is on there for the full season, guess that means its going to be ready for the new build. I'm pretty pumped about that.
I like the participation plan the most. Getting $10 a season for competing in a couple series is a great idea. They do need to increase the number of people racing so I think this will help.
Yeah, memebership didn't really go down at all I don't think. They just subtracted off the amount you would have gotten in iRacing dollars. Makes sense though, I think people would rather just pay $99 for a year and then buy what they want, than have to pay $159 and get $60 free credits they may or may not need.
Looks like iRacing is dropping the prices on content.
If this brings in more memebers, I'm all for it. Kind of sucks for people who paid the higher prices for everything, but whatever. Happens with pretty much everything when you want to be the first one to have it. They still haven't posted the full details but its supposedly coming some time today.
I'd have to imagine that there is a lot of balance that goes on in rocketry to make the thing actually go straight, if you strapped a huge engine to a tiny rocket, I could see it not ending well. I don't think it would just blow up, but I don't think it would end up where you want it to either.
Not looking forward to the snow at all. I've been looking around for used cars for the winter, going to be putting mine away in a couple weeks. It's going to be a sad 5-6 months until I get back into it in the spring.
What websites are you trying to load? Couldn't your connection to London(the server SpeedTest claims to be using) be fine, but something is screwed up beyond that?
Should have known he was going to get run off the track? That's complete BS. If they were equal on the track then they should have been going side-by-side into the next corner and Magnussen would have had him easy, not Bergmeister automatically getting the spot and Magnussen ending up on the wrong side of the rumble strips.
If you "should know" that someone's going to dump you, then Bergmeister "should have known" he was going to get punted in the last corner.
That was an awesome battle to watch for the last 5 or so laps, taking pit exit to make a pass was pretty epic, even though it turned out to be illegal and I'm sure he knew that but had to try anyway. I thought for sure the Corvette had him when he got pushed up to the wall coming to the line, then all of a sudden he took that hard right turn and I was no longer as excited.
I don't know how I feel about the Fast Track thing, I guess I'll have to see how it pans out. It makes sense to promote people faster as there are plenty of good racers just sitting around for months waiting to be promoted up to the higher cars. I just don't want to see people getting promoted up to the higher levels by racing down to boost their SR, and then they're not actually ready to race the faster stuff. Of course that happens now anyway(I do it in road), just seems like it could happen more with this. It could boost the numbers of guys racing in A/B though, which is definitely a good thing.
One thing I do hate is the part about Pro guys losing their license, that just seems pretty harsh considering how much SR you can loose just by having a couple of unlucky races. I could see not allowing them to race in pro races if they are under 1.0, but once they get their SR back up I think they should be let back in.
My technique is to hold W+O at the same time, then Q+P at the same time, and keep alternating. It takes some practice to get the timing down so he doesn't loose his balance, but I actually did get the dude to run for a couple meters before I screwed it up. You want to take a pretty small first step to get him moving in the right direction also, and after that it seems like its all balance to keep his legs under him.
I don't think onboard video will work very well for your third monitor, if it works at all.
There are three ways to go about using three monitors:
1) SoftTH. This is free software(google it) that you can use to get all three monitors to work. In order to use this though, you need another video card for the third monitor output. It DOES NOT have to be a good card, but it should be PCI-e 16x. Therefore, if your motherboard doesn't have a second PCI-e 16x slot, this is probably not a good solution for you. With SoftTH you do not have to run all the monitors at the same resolution, but the sides must be the same(they can be different from the center).
2) TH2Go. This is a hardware adapter(again, google it) that you buy that takes the signal coming from your video card, and splits it up into three images for your 3 monitors. If you go with this, all monitors must be running the same resolution as far as I know, unless they changed something. This obviously costs money, so this option is more expensive than #1.
3) There is some new ATI card that just came out that supports three monitors right out of the box. I believe its called Eyefinity. You might want to look into that. Even though you sound like you just build a new PC, an all-in-one card might be the simplest route. Make sure you can run different monitor resolutions with that if you need to though, I don't know much about it but I'd make sure it didn't have limitations like the TH2Go has.
So those are your options. Also it would be good to note that you will take a bigger performance hit from SoftTH since everything is done in software. With your PC I think you would be fine though, I have a much older computer running SoftTH maxed out with no problems. My recommendation would be SoftTH if you have the extra PCI-e slot, less expensive(old graphics cards are cheaper than a TH2Go or a brand new ATI card), and if you plan on running a different resolution on your sides, then you might not have much of a choice anyway. I really don't know much about the new card though, so if that's getting good reviews maybe that's a better option.
They sure look like they must be 3D, if that was just a texture it would look really bad as you went by the building. I just wish there was less motion blur, brings the whole picture down in my opinion.